Literature DB >> 28423815

Mobile Medical Apps and mHealth Devices: A Framework to Build Medical Apps and mHealth Devices in an Ethical Manner to Promote Safer Use - A Literature Review.

Mary Sharp1, Declan O'Sullivan1.   

Abstract

This paper presents a preliminary literature review in the area of ethics in the development of Mobile Medical Apps and mHealth. The review included both direct health apps and also apps marketed under the area of well-being in addition to mHealth devices. The following words and combinations of them were used to carry out the search for publications, mHealth, Apps, Ethics. The search engines used were Google Scholar, and PubMed. The paper is restricted to publications since 2012. The total number of papers found was 1,920 of which 84 were reviewed. The reason for so few being reviewed was that the majority only considered security. The search revealed many papers dealing with security for all types of apps and mHealth devices but there are very few papers dealing with the ethical issues related to Apps or mHealth devices in the area. It is noted however that the number of apps is increasing in number exponentially and therefore it is argued that it is necessary to pay attention to the ethical aspects. There are now estimated to be 165,000 apps available in this area. How ethics are addressed in health and well-being apps is important as they can have an effect on the health of the individual using them. In a similar way, the need for addressing ethical issues for development of well-being apps is evident. In a study [1] it was noted that even though Electronic Health Record (EHR) was the highest ranked tablet-related task only one third of clinicians said that EHR was optimized for smartphones. When apps are integrated with the EHR they fully optimize productivity. In the same study the significant challenges identified included the method of evaluation and selection of mobile health solutions in order to ensure that clinical outcomes, care and efficiency are included. Security is mentioned but again wider ethical issues were not a consideration. From the literature review it is clear that there is a need for guidelines for how developers of medical ad well-being apps and mHealth devices should address ethical issues during development, and the generation of these guidelines is the subject of ongoing research by the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apps; Ethics; mHealth

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28423815

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform        ISSN: 0926-9630


  11 in total

Review 1.  "Mobile Health" for the Management of Spondyloarthritis and Its Application in China.

Authors:  Xiaojian Ji; Lidong Hu; Yiwen Wang; Yiming Luo; Jian Zhu; Jianglin Zhang; M A Khan; Feng Huang
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 4.592

2.  Digital Communication Technology: Does Offering a Choice of Modality Improve Medication Adherence and Outcomes in a Persistent Asthma Population?

Authors:  P J Cvietusa; N M Wagner; J A Shoup; G K Goodrich; S M Shetterly; D K King; M A Raebel; C S Riggs; B Bender
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2020-12

3.  User-documented food consumption data from publicly available apps: an analysis of opportunities and challenges for nutrition research.

Authors:  Marcus Maringer; Pieter Van't Veer; Naomi Klepacz; Muriel C D Verain; Anne Normann; Suzanne Ekman; Lada Timotijevic; Monique M Raats; Anouk Geelen
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2018-06-09       Impact factor: 3.271

4.  More Stamina, a Gamified mHealth Solution for Persons with Multiple Sclerosis: Research Through Design.

Authors:  Guido Giunti; Vasiliki Mylonopoulou; Octavio Rivera Romero
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 4.773

5.  Seven pillars for ethics in digital diagnostic assistance among clinicians: Take-homes from a multi-stakeholder and multi-country workshop.

Authors:  Lucie Laflamme; Lee Alan Wallis
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.413

6.  Targeting ethical considerations tied to image-based mobile health diagnostic support specific to clinicians in low-resource settings: the Brocher proposition.

Authors:  L Laflamme; J Chipps; H Fangerau; N Juth; F Légaré; H R Sawe; L Wallis
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 2.640

7.  EULAR points to consider for the development, evaluation and implementation of mobile health applications aiding self-management in people living with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases.

Authors:  Aurélie Najm; Elena Nikiphorou; Marie Kostine; Christophe Richez; John D Pauling; Axel Finckh; Valentin Ritschl; Yeliz Prior; Petra Balážová; Simon Stones; Zoltan Szekanecz; Annamaria Iagnocco; Sofia Ramiro; Francisca Sivera; Maxime Dougados; Loreto Carmona; Gerd Burmester; Dieter Wiek; Laure Gossec; Francis Berenbaum
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2019-09-13

8.  Needs, Experiences, and Views of People With Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases on Self-Management Mobile Health Apps: Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Aurelie Najm; Heidi Lempp; Laure Gossec; Francis Berenbaum; Elena Nikiphorou
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 4.773

9.  Postoperative Home Monitoring After Joint Replacement: Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Homer Yang; Geoff Dervin; Susan Madden; Paul E Beaulé; Sylvain Gagné; Mary L Crossan; Ashraf Fayad; Kathryn Wheeler; Melody Afagh; Tinghua Zhang; Monica Taljaard
Journal:  JMIR Perioper Med       Date:  2018-09-05

10.  3MD for Chronic Conditions, a Model for Motivational mHealth Design: Embedded Case Study.

Authors:  Guido Giunti
Journal:  JMIR Serious Games       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 4.143

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.