| Literature DB >> 28423033 |
Lucyna Twerd1, Maciej Krzyżyński2, Barbara Waldon-Rudzionek3, Piotr Olszewski2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Published sources document a loss of biodiversity at an extreme rate, mainly because natural and semi-natural ecosystems are becoming fragmented and isolated, thus losing their biological functions. These changes significantly influence biological diversity, which is a complex phenomenon that changes over time. Contemporary ecologists must therefore draw attention to anthropogenic replacement habitats and increase their conservation status. In our studies we show the positive role of soda ash dumping grounds as an alternative habitat for digger wasps, especially the thermophilic species. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28423033 PMCID: PMC5397032 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175664
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1The study area with soda ash wastelands in the Kujawy region of central Poland.
Study sites: microhabitat 1, sites A, B: succession stage I (A1, B1–2009 year, A2, B2–2010 year); microhabitat 2, sites C, D: succession stage II (C1, D1–2009 year, C2, D2–2010 year); microhabitat 3, sites E, F: succession stage III (E1, F1–2007 year, E2, F2–2008 year, E3, F3–2009 year) (see Tables 1 and 2).
Characteristics of the three microhabitats and values of the component “anthropopressure” extracted by PCA: [1]—Soil degradation, [2]—Succession stage.
| salty soils | alkaline soils | moist soils | |||
| 1 | A | 17.24 | 31.03 | 13.79 | 0.609 |
| B | 15.00 | 33.12 | 12.02 | 0.568 | |
| 2 | C | 5.26 | 19.04 | 10.52 | 0.237 |
| D | 2.56 | 19.95 | 9.52 | 0.065 | |
| 3 | E | 0.00 | 14.78 | 7.69 | -0.351 |
| F | 0.00 | 12.82 | 7.30 | -0.363 | |
| % of bare surface with no plants | % of herbaceous vegetation | % of woodlands | |||
| 1 | A | 50 | 50 | 0 | -0.495 |
| B | 45 | 55 | 0 | -0.472 | |
| 2 | C | 30 | 70 | 0 | -0.388 |
| D | 20 | 80 | 0 | -0.308 | |
| 3 | E | 5 | 85 | 10 | 0.531 |
| F | 5 | 90 | 5 | 0.383 | |
The list of Spheciformes species in the areas influenced by the soda ash industry.
The ecological classification of the species was based on the works of Jacobs and Oehlke [39], Schmid-Egger et al. [40] and Blösch [23]: 1–18 (eurytopic open areas species), 19–47 (stenotopic open areas species), 48–64 (stenotopic forest species). Threat categories according to Fauna of Poland [46]: EX?–probably extinct; VU–vulnerable, NT–nearly threatened; DD–deficient data; vrm–very rare, rm–rare.Nesting preferences: en–endogeic species (nesting in the ground), (en)–cleptoparasite endogeic species, hy–hypergeic species (nesting above ground). Food preferences: Ara–Araneae, Dip–Diptera, Col–Coleoptera, He-Ap–He-an–Hemiptera-another, Hym–Hymenoptera, cl–cleptoparasite, Ort–Orthoptera, Ort-Bla–Orthoptera & Blattodea, Lep–Lepidoptera.
| No | Species | Status | Nesting | Food | Inowrocław | Janikowo | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SODA-MĄTWY facility | JANIKOSODA facility | |||||||||
| A | B | C | E | D | F | |||||
| 2009–2010 | 2009–2010 | 2009–2010 | 2007–2009 | 2009–2010 | 2007–2009 | |||||
| 1 | - | en | He-an | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | |
| 2 | - | en | Hym | - | - | - | 2 | - | - | |
| 3 | - | en | Lep | - | 1 | 5 | 5 | 19 | 6 | |
| 4 | - | en | He-an | 1 | 1 | - | 6 | - | - | |
| 5 | - | en | He-an | 9 | 2 | 14 | 15 | 4 | - | |
| 6 | - | en | Col | 4 | 26 | 25 | 31 | 58 | 16 | |
| 7 | - | en | Hym | 22 | 30 | 175 | 171 | 42 | 46 | |
| 8 | - | en | Dip | 139 | 15 | 175 | 34 | 7 | - | |
| 9 | - | en | He-Ap | - | - | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | |
| 10 | - | en | He-Ap | - | - | - | 1 | - | 4 | |
| 11 | - | en | He-an | - | - | - | - | 3 | - | |
| 12 | - | en | He-an | - | 1 | 4 | 13 | 8 | 10 | |
| 13 | - | en | Hym | - | - | - | 45 | 4 | 1 | |
| 14 | - | en | Dip | 1 | - | - | - | - | 2 | |
| 15 | - | en | Dip | - | - | 1 | 25 | - | - | |
| 16 | - | en | Dip | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | |
| 17 | - | en | Hym | 6 | 1 | 7 | 9 | 3 | 5 | |
| 18 | - | en | Ort | - | - | 5 | 9 | 13 | 12 | |
| 19 | - | en | Col | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | 1 | |
| 20 | vrm | en | Col | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | |
| 21 | - | en | Col | - | - | - | - | 2 | - | |
| 22 | - | en | Dip | - | - | - | 4 | 1 | 1 | |
| 23 | - | en | Dip | - | - | 1 | 27 | 4 | 1 | |
| 24 | - | en | He-an | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | |
| 25 | - | en | He-an | 1 | - | 3 | 10 | - | - | |
| 26 | - | en | Col | - | - | - | 2 | 1 | 1 | |
| 27 | - | en | He-an | - | - | 1 | - | - | 2 | |
| 28 | vrm VU | en | He-an | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | |
| 29 | VU | en | Lep | - | 2 | 4 | 9 | 1 | 4 | |
| 30 | - | en | Dip | - | - | 2 | 2 | - | 1 | |
| 31 | - | en | He-an | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | |
| 32 | - | (en) | Cl | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | |
| 33 | - | (en) | Cl | 2 | - | 2 | 12 | 1 | - | |
| 34 | - | (en) | Cl | 12 | 3 | 66 | 81 | 14 | 13 | |
| 35 | NT | (en) | Cl | - | - | 2 | 7 | - | 1 | |
| 36 | - | (en) | Cl | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | |
| 37 | - | en | Dip | - | - | - | 60 | 2 | 1 | |
| 38 | - | en | Dip | 5 | 3 | 16 | 354 | 9 | 21 | |
| 39 | - | en | Dip | - | - | - | 3 | 5 | 1 | |
| 40 | VU | en | Dip | - | - | - | 3 | 1 | 1 | |
| 41 | - | en | Lep | 1 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 9 | 2 | |
| 42 | - | en | Lep | 1 | - | - | - | 1 | - | |
| 43 | EX? | en | Ort | - | - | - | 2 | 1 | 1 | |
| 44 | - | en | Ort-Bla | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | |
| 45 | NT | en | Ort | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | |
| 46 | vrm | en | Ort | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | |
| 47 | - | en | He-an | - | - | 3 | 1 | - | - | |
| 48 | - | hy | Dip | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | |
| 49 | vrm | hy | Dip | - | - | - | 17 | - | 6 | |
| 50 | - | hy | Dip | - | - | - | 2 | 20 | 5 | |
| 51 | - | hy | Dip | 1 | - | - | 2 | - | 1 | |
| 52 | - | hy | Dip | - | - | - | 2 | 1 | - | |
| 53 | - | (en) | Cl | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | |
| 54 | DD | hy | He-Ap | - | - | - | 3 | - | - | |
| 55 | - | hy | He-Ap | - | - | - | 3 | - | 1 | |
| 56 | vrm | hy | He-Ap | 1 | - | 2 | 5 | 4 | 3 | |
| 57 | - | hy | He-Ap | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | |
| 58 | - | hy | He-Ap | - | - | - | 102 | 3 | 32 | |
| 59 | - | hy | He-Ap | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | 3 | |
| 60 | vrm | hy | He-an | - | - | - | 2 | 3 | - | |
| 61 | - | hy | Ara | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | |
| 62 | - | hy | Ara | - | - | - | 5 | - | 3 | |
| 63 | rm | hy | Ara | - | - | - | 20 | 37 | 3 | |
| 64 | - | hy | Ara | 1 | - | 1 | 48 | 40 | 26 | |
Fig 2The percentage of Spheciformes in the areas affected by the soda ash industry.
(See Table 2).
Fig 3a-d. RDA ordination diagram showing the loadings of Spheciformes species on the axes I and II and the vectors representing the analyzed habitat parameters.
Pie charts show the percentage of these species in microhabitat 1 (white), microhabitat 2 (gray) and microhabitat 3 (black). The variables shown in the figure explained 66.8% of the variation in . Microhabitat 1: succession stage I soda ash waste, herbaceous vegetation coverage < 60%; microhabitat 2: succession stage II soda ash waste, herbaceous vegetation coverage > 60%; microhabitat 3: succession stage III soda ash waste, herbaceous vegetation coverage > 80%, tree coverage > 5%. (R) soil acidity: R5 (alkaline, pH > 7). S/F: salinity/moisture (See Methods). Species name abbreviations: aly_spi—Alysson spinosus; amm_cam—Ammophila campestris; amm_sab—Ammophila sabulosa; arg_mys—Argogorytes mystaceus; ast_boo—Astata boops; ast_min—Astata minor; cer_are—Cerceris arenaria; cer_fla—Cerceris flavilabris; cer_int—Cerceris interrupta; cer_ryb—Cerceris rybyensis; cer_qui—Cerceris quinquefasciata; cra_cri—Crabro cribrarius; cra_pel—Crabro peltarius; cra_scu—Crabro scutellatus; cro_cer—Crossocerus cetratus; dio_lup—Diodontus luperus; dio_min—Diodontus minutus; dio_tri -Diodontus tristis; dry_sti—Dryudella stigma; ect_conf—Ectemnius confinis; ect_con—Ectemnius continuus; ect_div—Ectemnius dives; ect_rub—Ectemnius rubicola; ent_bre—Entomognathus brevis; gor_qui—Gorytes quinquefasciatus; har_lae—Harpactus laevis; har_lun—Harpactus lunatus; les_ala—Lestica alata; lin_alb—Lindenius albilabris; lin_pan—Lindenius panzeri; lin_pyg—Lindenius pygmaeus; mel_cra—Mellinus crabroneus; mim_bic—Mimesa bicolor; nys_dim—Nysson dimidiatus; nys_int—Nysson interruptus; nys_mac—Nysson maculosus; nys_nig—Nysson niger; nys_trid—Nysson tridens; nys_tri—Nysson trimaculatus; oxy_bip—Oxybelus bipunctatus; oxy_man—Oxybelus mandibularis; oxy_tri—Oxybelus trispinosus; oxy_qua—Oxybelus quatuordecimnotatus; oxy_uni—Oxybelus uniglumis; oxy_var—Oxybelus variegatus; pas_cly—Passaloecus clypealis; pas_sin—Passaloecus singularis; pem_aus—Pemphredon austriaca; pem_ino—Pemphredon inornata; pem_let—Pemphredon lethifer; pem_mor—Pemphredon morio; phi_tri—Philanthus triangulum; pod_aff—Podalonia affinis; pod_hir—Podalonia hirsuta; sor_com—Solierella compedita; tac_ful—Tachysphex fulvitarsis; tac_nit—Tachysphex nitidus; tac_pom—Tachysphex pompiliformis; tac_psa—Tachysphex psammobius; tac_uni—Tachysphex unicolor; try_att—Trypoxylon attenuatum; try_dec—Trypoxylon deceptorium; try_fig—Trypoxylon figulus; try_min—Trypoxylon minus.Principal Components Analysis (PCA): microhabitat 1: (A1, A2, B1, B2), microhabitat 2: (C1, C2, D1, D2), microhabitat 3: (E1, E2, F1, F2).
Results of stepwise selection of variables and a Monte Carlo Permutation Test–Analysis of the significance of the effect of the studied variables on the occurrence of different species of Spheciformes; marked variables were significant at p < 0.05.
| Variables | RDA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Level of significance | Variation | % of explained variation | |
| woodlands < 2.5 m | 0.001 | 0.25 | 3.01 |
| R5 –alkaline soils (6≤pH<7) | 0.018 | 0.16 | 2.14 |
| S/F–salinity/humidity | 0.037 | 0.12 | 1.81 |
| dicotyledonous vegetation > 25 cm | 0.110 | 0.10 | 1.56 |
| grass > 50 cm | 0.743 | 0.04 | 0.62 |
Fig 4Comparison of the digger wasps larvae food spectrum between soda ash wastelands (Soda Mątwy and JanikoSoda) and whole fauna of polish digger wasps.
Fig 5RDA ordination diagram showing the loadings of 44 species on the axes I and II and two "anthropogenic pressure" components (see PCA, Table 1).
Changes in the indices describing the structure of digger wasp communities (diversity, species richness and abundance) along the anthropogenic pressure gradient (soil degradation and succession stage) are visualized using a General Linear Model (GLM). Species name abbreviations as in Fig 3.