Literature DB >> 28422950

Application of high-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization in children with unknown syndromic microcephaly.

Eirini Tsoutsou1, Maria Tzetis1, Krinio Giannikou1, Maria Braoudaki1, Anastasis Mitrakos1, Stella Amenta2, Nikoletta Selenti1, Emmanouil Kanavakis1, Dimitrios Zafeiriou3, Sophia Kitsiou-Tzeli1, Helena Fryssira1.   

Abstract

BackroundMicrocephaly can either be isolated or it may coexist with other neurological entities and/or multiple congenital anomalies, known as syndromic microcephaly. Although many syndromic cases can be classified based on the characteristic phenotype, some others remain uncertain and require further investigation. The present study describes the application of array-comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) as a diagnostic tool for the study of patients with clinically unknown syndromic microcephaly.MethodsFrom a cohort of 210 unrelated patients referred with syndromic microcephaly, we applied array-CGH analysis in 53 undiagnosed cases. In all the 53 cases except one, previous standard karyotype was negative. High-resolution 4 × 180K and 1 × 244K Agilent arrays were used in this study.ResultsIn 25 out of the 53 patients with microcephaly among other phenotypic anomalies, array-CGH revealed copy number variations (CNVs) ranging in size between 15 kb and 31.6 Mb. The identified CNVs were definitely causal for microcephaly in 11/53, probably causal in 7/53, and not causal for microcephaly in 7/53 patients. Genes potentially contributing to brain deficit were revealed in 16/53 patients.ConclusionsArray-CGH contributes to the elucidation of undefined syndromic microcephalic cases by permitting the discovery of novel microdeletions and/or microduplications. It also allows a more precise genotype-phenotype correlation by the accurate definition of the breakpoints in the deleted/duplicated regions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28422950     DOI: 10.1038/pr.2017.65

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Res        ISSN: 0031-3998            Impact factor:   3.756


  36 in total

1.  The clinical utility of molecular karyotyping using high-resolution array-comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  Maria Tzetis; Sofia Kitsiou-Tzeli; Helen Frysira; Athena Xaidara; Emmanuel Kanavakis
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.225

Review 2.  Microcephaly syndromes.

Authors:  Dianne Abuelo
Journal:  Semin Pediatr Neurol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.636

3.  Identification and functional characterization of de novo FOXP1 variants provides novel insights into the etiology of neurodevelopmental disorder.

Authors:  Elliot Sollis; Sarah A Graham; Arianna Vino; Henning Froehlich; Maaike Vreeburg; Danai Dimitropoulou; Christian Gilissen; Rolph Pfundt; Gudrun A Rappold; Han G Brunner; Pelagia Deriziotis; Simon E Fisher
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 6.150

4.  109 kb deletion of chromosome 4p16.3 in a patient with mild phenotype of Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome.

Authors:  Nobuhiko Okamoto; Kazumi Ohmachi; Shino Shimada; Keiko Shimojima; Toshiyuki Yamamoto
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 2.802

5.  Interstitial 12p deletion involving more than 40 genes in a patient with postnatal microcephaly, psychomotor delay, optic nerve atrophy, and facial dysmorphism.

Authors:  Anne Hoppe; Jan Heinemeyer; Eva Klopocki; Luitgard M Graul-Neumann; Birgit Spors; Petra Bittigau; Angela M Kaindl
Journal:  Meta Gene       Date:  2014-01-11

6.  A genome-wide association study and biological pathway analysis of epilepsy prognosis in a prospective cohort of newly treated epilepsy.

Authors:  Doug Speed; Clive Hoggart; Slave Petrovski; Ioanna Tachmazidou; Alison Coffey; Andrea Jorgensen; Hariklia Eleftherohorinou; Maria De Iorio; Marian Todaro; Tisham De; David Smith; Philip E Smith; Margaret Jackson; Paul Cooper; Mark Kellett; Stephen Howell; Mark Newton; Raju Yerra; Meng Tan; Chris French; Markus Reuber; Graeme E Sills; David Chadwick; Munir Pirmohamed; David Bentley; Ingrid Scheffer; Samuel Berkovic; David Balding; Aarno Palotie; Anthony Marson; Terence J O'Brien; Michael R Johnson
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 6.150

7.  The recurrent distal 22q11.2 microdeletions are often de novo and do not represent a single clinical entity: a proposed categorization system.

Authors:  Fady M Mikhail; Rachel D Burnside; Brooke Rush; Jennifer Ibrahim; Robin Godshalk; S Lane Rutledge; Nathaniel H Robin; Maria D Descartes; Andrew J Carroll
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  1q25.2-q31.3 Deletion in a female with mental retardation, clinodactyly, minor facial anomalies but no growth retardation.

Authors:  Ping Hu; Yan Wang; Lu-Lu Meng; Ling Qin; Ding-Yuan Ma; Long Yi; Zheng-Feng Xu
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 2.009

9.  Role of the cytoplasmic isoform of RBFOX1/A2BP1 in establishing the architecture of the developing cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Nanako Hamada; Hidenori Ito; Ikuko Iwamoto; Rika Morishita; Hidenori Tabata; Koh-Ichi Nagata
Journal:  Mol Autism       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 7.509

10.  Rab35 promotes the recruitment of Rab8, Rab13 and Rab36 to recycling endosomes through MICAL-L1 during neurite outgrowth.

Authors:  Hotaka Kobayashi; Kan Etoh; Norihiko Ohbayashi; Mitsunori Fukuda
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 2.422

View more
  1 in total

1.  Genomic Analysis of Korean Patient With Microcephaly.

Authors:  Jiwon Lee; Jong Eun Park; Chung Lee; Ah Reum Kim; Byung Joon Kim; Woong-Yang Park; Chang-Seok Ki; Jeehun Lee
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 4.599

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.