Literature DB >> 28422448

Benefits of clinical facilitators on improving stroke care in acute hospitals: a new programme for Australia.

Tara Purvis1, Karen Moss2, Linda Francis3, Karen Borschmann2, Monique F Kilkenny1,2, Sonia Denisenko4, Christopher F Bladin2,5, Dominique A Cadilhac1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Care gaps for stroke lead to preventable disability and deaths. The Victorian State Government implemented a programme of employing clinical Facilitators on a fixed-term basis for up to 3 years (2008-2011) in eight hospitals to improve stroke care. The Facilitators were to establish stroke units where absent, implement evidence-based management protocols and provide staff education within an agreed work plan. AIM: To determine if the Facilitator role was associated with improved stroke care and to describe factors supporting or mitigating enhancements to care.
METHODS: A mixed methods design was employed with historical control using patient-level audit data (pre-Facilitator: n = 600; post-Facilitator: n = 387) and qualitative data from independently conducted semistructured interviews with hospital staff, including clinicians, executives and facilitators (n = 10 focus groups; 75 respondents).
RESULTS: Stroke units, clinical pathways and outpatient clinics for managing transient ischaemic attacks (TIA) were established. Compared with the pre-Facilitator period, significant increases in patient access to stroke unit care (53% vs 86%, P < 0.001) and intravenous thrombolysis (2% vs 9%, P < 0.001) were achieved. Hospital staff reported that the Facilitator was integral to system improvements by fostering communication, encouraging team motivation and cohesiveness and increasing interest in stroke care. Ongoing barriers included limited resources to operate TIA clinics effectively, staff turnover requiring ongoing education, inconsistency in compliance with protocols and, in some hospitals, the need for formalised medical leadership.
CONCLUSION: Fixed-term employment of Facilitators was effective in positively influencing stroke care in hospitals through a range of change management strategies where stroke-specific expertise had been previously limited.
© 2017 Royal Australasian College of Physicians.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical facilitator; health policy and outcomes research; health services research; quality improvement; stroke care

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28422448     DOI: 10.1111/imj.13458

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intern Med J        ISSN: 1444-0903            Impact factor:   2.048


  3 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review and meta-synthesis of policy intervention characteristics that influence the implementation of government-directed policy in the hospital setting: implications for infection prevention and control.

Authors:  Sally M Havers; Elizabeth Kate Martin; Andrew Wilson; Lisa Hall
Journal:  J Infect Prev       Date:  2020-05-04

2.  Is length of time in a stroke unit associated with better outcomes for patients with stroke in Australia? An observational study.

Authors:  Doreen Busingye; Monique F Kilkenny; Tara Purvis; Joosup Kim; Sandy Middleton; Bruce C V Campbell; Dominique A Cadilhac
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Rationale and design of individualized quality improvement based on the Computer Analysing system to improve Stroke management quality Evaluation (CASE): a multicenter historically controlled study.

Authors:  Yi Chen; Wansi Zhong; Xiaoxian Gong; Haitao Hu; Shenqiang Yan; Xuting Zhang; Zhicai Chen; Ying Zhou; Min Lou
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 2.279

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.