BACKGROUND: The 'Acute Resuscitation Plan' (ARP) is a document for recording the resuscitation plans of patients at a tertiary hospital for adult patients. The ARP was introduced at the hospital in September 2014, superseding the 'Not for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR)' form. Unlike the Not for CPR form, the ARP was relevant to patients with and without resuscitation limits. AIM: To evaluate the introduction of the ARP. METHODS: This study is a retrospective audit of the records of all admissions to the hospital from January to June 2014 (Not for CPR period) and January to June 2015 (ARP period). The main outcomes are the incidence of resuscitation plans, the proportion of ARP specifying consultation with the patient (or representative) and with senior medical staff, and the proportion of ARP among older patients and those with significant comorbidity. RESULTS: Resuscitation plans were present for 453 of 23 325 (1.9%) admissions in the Not for CPR period versus 1801 of 24 037 (7.5%) in the ARP period (odds ratio (OR) 4.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.7-4.5, P < 0.001). A total of 42% of ARP specified 'care of the dying' in the event of arrest. Acknowledgement of the views of the patient (or representative) was indicated on 37% of ARP and of a senior physician on 28%. An ARP was not present for 67% of patients aged ≥90 years, 59% from aged care, 90% with metastatic cancer and 64% aged ≥80 years and with a Charlson comorbidity index ≥3. CONCLUSIONS: More patients had resuscitation plans after introducing the ARP. However, patients and senior physicians were often remote from the consultation process, and an ARP was not present for many patients likely to have a poor outcome from cardiopulmonary arrest.
BACKGROUND: The 'Acute Resuscitation Plan' (ARP) is a document for recording the resuscitation plans of patients at a tertiary hospital for adult patients. The ARP was introduced at the hospital in September 2014, superseding the 'Not for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR)' form. Unlike the Not for CPR form, the ARP was relevant to patients with and without resuscitation limits. AIM: To evaluate the introduction of the ARP. METHODS: This study is a retrospective audit of the records of all admissions to the hospital from January to June 2014 (Not for CPR period) and January to June 2015 (ARP period). The main outcomes are the incidence of resuscitation plans, the proportion of ARP specifying consultation with the patient (or representative) and with senior medical staff, and the proportion of ARP among older patients and those with significant comorbidity. RESULTS: Resuscitation plans were present for 453 of 23 325 (1.9%) admissions in the Not for CPR period versus 1801 of 24 037 (7.5%) in the ARP period (odds ratio (OR) 4.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.7-4.5, P < 0.001). A total of 42% of ARP specified 'care of the dying' in the event of arrest. Acknowledgement of the views of the patient (or representative) was indicated on 37% of ARP and of a senior physician on 28%. An ARP was not present for 67% of patients aged ≥90 years, 59% from aged care, 90% with metastatic cancer and 64% aged ≥80 years and with a Charlson comorbidity index ≥3. CONCLUSIONS: More patients had resuscitation plans after introducing the ARP. However, patients and senior physicians were often remote from the consultation process, and an ARP was not present for many patients likely to have a poor outcome from cardiopulmonary arrest.
Authors: Claire A Curtis; Maria U Nguyen; Greasha K Rathnasekara; Rachel J Manderson; Mae Y Chong; Janith K Malawaraarachchi; Zheng Song; Priyanka Kanumuri; Bradley J Potenzi; Andy K H Lim Journal: Intern Med J Date: 2022-05 Impact factor: 2.611