Literature DB >> 28422367

Microtensile Bond Strength of a Resin Cement to Silica-Based and Y-TZP Ceramics Using Different Surface Treatments.

Alireza Keshvad1, Seyed Mohammad Reza Hakimaneh1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of different surface treatments on the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of bonding between resin cement and lithia or zirconia-based ceramics using an in vitro study.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three zirconia ceramic blocks (IPS e.max ZirCAD) and three lithium disilicate ceramic blocks (IPS e.max CAD) were sintered and duplicated in resin composite. The zirconia specimens underwent various treatments (n = 1): (i) Sandblast + primer (ZiSa); (ii) sandblast + laser irradiation + primer (ZiSaLa); or (iii) laser irradiation + primer (ZiLa). The lithium disilicate specimens also underwent various treatments: (i) sandblast + HF + silane (LiSaE); (ii) sandblast + silane (LiSa); or (iii) sandblast + laser irradiation + silane (LiSaLa). The ceramic-composite blocks were cemented with resin cement and cut to produce bars with approx. 1 mm2 bonding areas. The specimens were thermocycled, and bond strength tests were performed in a universal testing machine. The fracture type was determined by observing the fractured surface under a stereomicroscope. The mean bond strengths of the specimens were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Duncan's tests (α = 0.05).
RESULTS: Mean comparison of the μTBS showed no significant difference between LiSaE and LiSa (p > 0.05), but significant differences between LiSaE and other groups (p ≤ 0.01). No significant differences were found between the ZiSaLa and ZiSa groups (p > 0.05). The modes of failure in all groups were mostly adhesive (57% to 80%). The mean bond strengths in laser-irradiated ceramics were significantly lower than those from other surface treatments. All ZiLa specimens debonded before testing (pretest failure).
CONCLUSIONS: Lithium disilicate ceramic surface treated with a combination of sandblasting and silane application provided a bond strength comparable to that provided by sandblasting in combination with acid etching and applying silane. Groups treated with laser irradiation had significantly lower bond strengths than other groups.
© 2017 by the American College of Prosthodontists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lithium disilicate ceramic; Nd:YAG laser; surface treatment; zirconia ceramic

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28422367     DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12622

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthodont        ISSN: 1059-941X            Impact factor:   2.752


  5 in total

1.  A novel porous silica-zirconia coating for improving bond performance of dental zirconia.

Authors:  Zhiwei Su; Mingxing Li; Ling Zhang; Chaoyang Wang; Leiqing Zhang; Jingqiu Xu; Baiping Fu
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 3.066

2.  Bonding of Clear Aligner Composite Attachments to Ceramic Materials: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Bashair A Alsaud; Maher S Hajjaj; Ahmad I Masoud; Ensanya A Abou Neel; Dalia A Abuelenain; Amal I Linjawi
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 3.748

3.  Effects of different ceramic primers and surface treatments on the shear bond strength of restorative composite resin to zirconium.

Authors:  Masoumeh Hasani Tabatabaei; Nasim Chiniforush; Seyedeh Fatemeh Namdar
Journal:  Laser Ther       Date:  2018-06-30

4.  Effect of different adhesive strategies on the microtensile bond strength of dentin to indirect resin-based composite.

Authors:  Guilherme Pinto; Lúcia Prieto; Josué-Junior Pierote; Laura Ferraz; João-Victor Câmara; Flávio-Henrique Aguiar
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-11-01

5.  Debonding mechanism of zirconia and lithium disilicate resin cemented to dentin.

Authors:  Mina Aker Sagen; Ketil Kvam; Eystein Ivar Ruyter; Hans Jacob Rønold
Journal:  Acta Biomater Odontol Scand       Date:  2019-01-24
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.