Literature DB >> 28420688

Can a partnership between general practitioners and ambulance services reduce conveyance to emergency care?

Manuel Villarreal1, Jonathan Leach2, Kandala Ngianga-Bakwin1,3,4, Jeremy Dale1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Emergency services are facing increasing workload pressures, and new models of care are needed. We evaluate the impact of a service development involving a partnership between emergency ambulance crews and general practitioners (GPs) on reducing conveyance rates to the Hospital Emergency Department(ED) .
METHODS: The service model was implemented in the West Midlands of England. Call handlers identified patients with needs that could be addressed by a GP using locally agreed criteria. GPs supported the assessment of such patients either at scene or by telephone. Routine data were collected from October 2012 to November 2013, from the ambulance service computer-aided dispatch system. Logistic regression models were used to determine the likelihood for patients being transported to ED.
RESULTS: Of 23 395 emergency contacts during the evaluation period, 1903 (8.1 %) patients were triaged to GP supported assessment. Mean age (SD) was 61.8 (27.9) years; 42.9 % were aged 75 years and over. 1221 (64.2%) had face-to-face GP assessment and 682 (35.8%) via telephone. 1500 (78%) of those who received GP support were not transported to hospital. After controlling for confounders, those aged greater than 75 years (OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.52 to 0.86), and females (OR 0.64; 95% CI 0.51 to 0.82) were less likely to be transported, while those who received GP telephone input rather than face-to-face assessment were more likely to be transferred to an ED (OR 2.14; 95% CI 1.69 to 2.72).
CONCLUSION: Support of the paramedic service by GPs enabled patients to avoid transfer to an ED, potentially avoiding subsequent hospital admission, reducing costs and improving quality of care for patients that are not in need of hospital services. However, use of services in the days following the call was not assessed, and hence the overall impact and safety requires further evaluation. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ambulance service; General Practice; admission; pre-hospital; urgent care

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28420688     DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2015-204924

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med J        ISSN: 1472-0205            Impact factor:   2.740


  8 in total

Review 1.  A review on ambulance offload delay literature.

Authors:  Mengyu Li; Peter Vanberkel; Alix J E Carter
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2018-07-07

2.  The dialogue as decision support; lived experiences of extended collaboration when an ambulance is called.

Authors:  Elin-Sofie Forsgärde; Anders Svensson; Mattias Rööst; Bengt Fridlund; Carina Elmqvist
Journal:  Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being       Date:  2021-12

3.  Characteristics of non-conveyance ambulance runs: A retrospective study in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Remco H A Ebben; Mariola Castelijns; Joost Frenken; Lilian C M Vloet
Journal:  World J Emerg Med       Date:  2019

4.  Designing and Governing Responsive Local Care Systems - Insights from a Scoping Review of Paramedics in Integrated Models of Care.

Authors:  Amir Allana; Walter Tavares; Andrew D Pinto; Kerry Kuluski
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 2.913

Review 5.  Alternatives to direct emergency department conveyance of ambulance patients: a scoping review of the evidence.

Authors:  Joanna M Blodgett; Duncan J Robertson; Elspeth Pennington; David Ratcliffe; Kenneth Rockwood
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  The Value of Merging Medical Data from Ambulance Services and General Practice Cooperatives Using Triple Aim Outcomes.

Authors:  Rosa Naomi Minderhout; Hedwig M M Vos; Pierre M van Grunsven; Isabel de la Torre Y Rivas; Sevde Alkir-Yurt; Mattijs E Numans; Marc A Bruijnzeels
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 5.120

7.  Self reported involvement in emergency medicine among GPs in Norway.

Authors:  Magnus Hjortdahl; Erik Zakariassen; Peder A Halvorsen
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 2.581

8.  Factors influencing the decision to convey or not to convey elderly people to the emergency department after emergency ambulance attendance: a systematic mixed studies review.

Authors:  Johan Oosterwold; Dennis Sagel; Sivera Berben; Petrie Roodbol; Manda Broekhuis
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.