Literature DB >> 28419709

Job Satisfaction and Subjective Well-Being Among Midwives: Analysis of a Multinational Cross-Sectional Survey.

Darja Jarosova, Elena Gurkova, Katarina Ziakova, Daniela Nedvedova, Alvisa Palese, Gloria Godeas, Sally Wai-Chi Chan, Mi Sook Song, Jongwon Lee, Raul Cordeiro, Beata Babiarczyk, Malgorzata Fras.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: There is a considerable amount of empirical evidence to indicate a positive association between an employee's subjective well-being and workplace performance and job satisfaction. Compared with nursing research, there is a relative lack of consistent scientific evidence concerning midwives' subjective well-being and its determinants related to domains of job satisfaction. The purpose of the study was to examine the association between the domains of job satisfaction and components of subjective well-being in hospital midwives.
METHODS: This cross-sectional descriptive study involved 1190 hospital midwives from 7 countries. Job satisfaction was measured by the McCloskey/Mueller Satisfaction Scale. Subjective well-being was conceptualized in the study by the 2 components (the affective and the cognitive component). The affective component of subjective well-being (ie, emotional well-being) was assessed by the Positive and the Negative Affect Scale. The cognitive component of subjective well-being (ie, life satisfaction) was measured by the Personal Well-Being Index. Pearson correlations and multiple regression analyses were used to determine associations between variables.
RESULTS: Findings from correlation and regression analyses indicated an overall weak association between the domains of job satisfaction and components of subjective well-being. Satisfaction with extrinsic rewards, coworkers, and interaction opportunities accounted for only 13% of variance in the cognitive component (life satisfaction). The affective component (emotional well-being) was weakly associated with satisfaction with control and responsibility. DISCUSSION: The low amount of variance suggests that neither component of subjective well-being is influenced by the domains of job satisfaction. Further studies should focus on identifying other predictors of subjective well-being among midwives. A better understanding of how specific job facets are related to the subjective well-being of midwives might assist employers in the design of counseling and intervention programs for subjective well-being of midwives in the workplace and workplace performance.
© 2016 by the American College of Nurse-Midwives.

Keywords:  job satisfaction; midwifery; subjective well-being

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28419709     DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.12516

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health        ISSN: 1526-9523            Impact factor:   2.388


  5 in total

Review 1.  Working Conditions of Occupational Physicians-A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Eva Eisch; Paulina Kuper; Lara Lindert; Kyung-Eun Anna Choi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  Mediating role of coping style on the relationship between job stress and subjective well-being among Korean police officers.

Authors:  Gi Wook Ryu; Yong Sook Yang; Mona Choi
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Development and psychometric properties of Iranian midwives job satisfaction instrument (MJSI): A sequential exploratory study.

Authors:  Ashraf Direkvand-Moghadam; Nasrin Rashan; Mona Bahmani; Safoura Taheri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Job satisfaction in midwives and its association with organisational and psychosocial factors at work: a nation-wide, cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Malin Hansson; Anna Dencker; Ingela Lundgren; Ing-Marie Carlsson; Monica Eriksson; Gunnel Hensing
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Burnout of the US midwifery workforce and the role of practice environment.

Authors:  E Brie Thumm; Denise C Smith; Allison P Squires; Ginger Breedlove; Paula M Meek
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 3.402

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.