Literature DB >> 28419484

Variations in the functional visual field for detection of lung nodules on chest computed tomography: Impact of nodule size, distance, and local lung complexity.

Lukas Ebner1, Martin Tall1, Kingshuk Roy Choudhury1, Donald L Ly2, Justus E Roos1, Sandy Napel2, Geoffrey D Rubin1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To explore the characteristics that impact lung nodule detection by peripheral vision when searching for lung nodules on chest CT-scans.
METHODS: This study was approved by the local IRB and is HIPAA compliant. A simulated primary (1°) target mass (2 × 2 × 5 cm) was embedded into 5 cm thick subvolumes (SV) extracted from three unenhanced lung MDCT scans (64 row, 1.25 mm thickness, 0.7 mm increment). One of 30 solid, secondary nodules with either 3-4 mm and 5-8 mm diameters were embedded into 192 of 207 SVs. The secondary nodule was placed at a random depth within each SV, a transverse distance of 2.5, 5, 7.5, or 10 mm, and along one of eight rays cast every 45° from the center of the 1° mass. Video recordings of transverse paging in cranio-caudal direction were created for each SV (frame rate three sections/sec). Six radiologists observed each cine-loop once while gaze-tracking hardware assured that gaze was centered on the 1° mass. Each radiologist assigned a confidence rating (0-5) to the detection of a secondary nodule and indicated its location. Detection sensitivity was analyzed relative to secondary nodule size, transverse distance, radial orientation, and lung complexity. Lung complexity was characterized by the number of particles (connected pixels) and the sum of the area of all particles above a -500 HU threshold within regions of interest around the 1° mass and secondary nodule.
RESULTS: Using a proportional odds logistic regression model and eliminating redundant predictors, models fit individually to each reader resulted in the following decreasing order of association based on greatest reduction in Akaike Information Criterion: secondary nodule diameter (6/6 readers, P < 0.001), distance from central mass (6/6 readers, P < 0.001), lung complexity particle count (5/6 readers, P = 0.05), and lung complexity particle area (3/6 readers, P = 0.03). Substantial inter-reader differences in sensitivity to decreasing nodule diameter, distance, and complexity characteristics were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Of the investigated parameters, secondary nodule size, distance from the gaze center and lung complexity (particle number and area) significantly impact nodule detection with peripheral vision.
© 2017 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  eye tracking; lung complexity; lung nodule detection; perception; thoracic computed tomography

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28419484     DOI: 10.1002/mp.12277

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  7 in total

1.  Image Annotation by Eye Tracking: Accuracy and Precision of Centerlines of Obstructed Small-Bowel Segments Placed Using Eye Trackers.

Authors:  Alfredo Lucas; Kang Wang; Cynthia Santillan; Albert Hsiao; Claude B Sirlin; Paul M Murphy
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Interchangeability between real and three-dimensional simulated lung tumors in computed tomography: an interalgorithm volumetry study.

Authors:  Marthony Robins; Justin Solomon; Jocelyn Hoye; Taylor Smith; Yuese Zheng; Lukas Ebner; Kingshuk Roy Choudhury; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-09-24

3.  Measurement of the useful field of view for single slices of different imaging modalities and targets.

Authors:  Miguel A Lago; Ioannis Sechopoulos; François O Bochud; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-02-08

4.  The Functional Visual Field(s) in simple visual search.

Authors:  Chia-Chien Wu; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  What do experts look at and what do experts find when reading mammograms?

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Chia-Chien Wu; Jonathan Li; Sneha B Suresh
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2021-07-13

Review 6.  Guided Search 6.0: An updated model of visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-02-05

Review 7.  Eye Movements in Medical Image Perception: A Selective Review of Past, Present and Future.

Authors:  Chia-Chien Wu; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-20
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.