BACKGROUND: Primary and adaptive resistance against chemo- and radiotherapy and local recurrence after surgery limit the benefits from these standard treatments in glioma patients. Recently we found that glioma cells can extend ultra-long membrane protrusions, "tumor microtubes" (TMs), for brain invasion, proliferation, and interconnection of single cells to a syncytium that is resistant to radiotherapy. We wondered whether TMs also convey resistance to the other 2 standard treatment modalities. METHODS: Patient-derived glioblastoma stemlike cell (GBMSC) lines were implanted under a cranial window in mice. Longitudinal in vivo two-photon laser scanning microscopy was used to follow tumor growth, including the fate of single glioma cells over months. RESULTS: After a cylindrical surgical lesion, GBMSCs increasingly extended TMs toward the lesion area, which contributed to the repopulation of this area over many weeks. In fact, an excessive "healing response" was observed in which tumor cell densities significantly exceeded those of unlesioned brain regions over time. Inhibition of TM formation and function by genetic targeting of growth associated protein-43 robustly suppressed this surgery-induced tumor growth reaction, in contrast to standard postsurgical anti-inflammatory treatment with dexamethasone. After one cycle of temozolomide chemotherapy, intra- and intertumoral heterogeneity of TM formation and interconnection was strongly associated with therapy response: when tumor cells were integrated in TM networks, they were more likely to resist chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: TMs can contribute to the resistance against standard treatment modalities in gliomas. Specific inhibition of TMs is a promising approach to reduce local recurrence after surgery and lower resistance to chemotherapy.
BACKGROUND: Primary and adaptive resistance against chemo- and radiotherapy and local recurrence after surgery limit the benefits from these standard treatments in glioma patients. Recently we found that glioma cells can extend ultra-long membrane protrusions, "tumor microtubes" (TMs), for brain invasion, proliferation, and interconnection of single cells to a syncytium that is resistant to radiotherapy. We wondered whether TMs also convey resistance to the other 2 standard treatment modalities. METHODS: Patient-derived glioblastoma stemlike cell (GBMSC) lines were implanted under a cranial window in mice. Longitudinal in vivo two-photon laser scanning microscopy was used to follow tumor growth, including the fate of single glioma cells over months. RESULTS: After a cylindrical surgical lesion, GBMSCs increasingly extended TMs toward the lesion area, which contributed to the repopulation of this area over many weeks. In fact, an excessive "healing response" was observed in which tumor cell densities significantly exceeded those of unlesioned brain regions over time. Inhibition of TM formation and function by genetic targeting of growth associated protein-43 robustly suppressed this surgery-induced tumor growth reaction, in contrast to standard postsurgical anti-inflammatory treatment with dexamethasone. After one cycle of temozolomide chemotherapy, intra- and intertumoral heterogeneity of TM formation and interconnection was strongly associated with therapy response: when tumor cells were integrated in TM networks, they were more likely to resist chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: TMs can contribute to the resistance against standard treatment modalities in gliomas. Specific inhibition of TMs is a promising approach to reduce local recurrence after surgery and lower resistance to chemotherapy.
Authors: Brett E Johnson; Tali Mazor; Chibo Hong; Michael Barnes; Koki Aihara; Cory Y McLean; Shaun D Fouse; Shogo Yamamoto; Hiroki Ueda; Kenji Tatsuno; Saurabh Asthana; Llewellyn E Jalbert; Sarah J Nelson; Andrew W Bollen; W Clay Gustafson; Elise Charron; William A Weiss; Ivan V Smirnov; Jun S Song; Adam B Olshen; Soonmee Cha; Yongjun Zhao; Richard A Moore; Andrew J Mungall; Steven J M Jones; Martin Hirst; Marco A Marra; Nobuhito Saito; Hiroyuki Aburatani; Akitake Mukasa; Mitchel S Berger; Susan M Chang; Barry S Taylor; Joseph F Costello Journal: Science Date: 2013-12-12 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Michael Weller; Wolfgang Wick; Ken Aldape; Michael Brada; Mitchell Berger; Stefan M Pfister; Ryo Nishikawa; Mark Rosenthal; Patrick Y Wen; Roger Stupp; Guido Reifenberger Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2015-07-16 Impact factor: 52.329
Authors: Onyinyechukwu Okolie; Juli R Bago; Ralf S Schmid; David M Irvin; Ryan E Bash; C Ryan Miller; Shawn D Hingtgen Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2016-06-13 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Dieter Lemke; Markus Weiler; Jonas Blaes; Benedikt Wiestler; Leonie Jestaedt; Ann-Catherine Klein; Sarah Löw; Günter Eisele; Bernhard Radlwimmer; David Capper; Kirsten Schmieder; Michel Mittelbronn; Stephanie E Combs; Martin Bendszus; Michael Weller; Michael Platten; Wolfgang Wick Journal: J Neurochem Date: 2014-07-18 Impact factor: 5.372
Authors: Matthias Osswald; Erik Jung; Felix Sahm; Gergely Solecki; Varun Venkataramani; Jonas Blaes; Sophie Weil; Heinz Horstmann; Benedikt Wiestler; Mustafa Syed; Lulu Huang; Miriam Ratliff; Kianush Karimian Jazi; Felix T Kurz; Torsten Schmenger; Dieter Lemke; Miriam Gömmel; Martin Pauli; Yunxiang Liao; Peter Häring; Stefan Pusch; Verena Herl; Christian Steinhäuser; Damir Krunic; Mostafa Jarahian; Hrvoje Miletic; Anna S Berghoff; Oliver Griesbeck; Georgios Kalamakis; Olga Garaschuk; Matthias Preusser; Samuel Weiss; Haikun Liu; Sabine Heiland; Michael Platten; Peter E Huber; Thomas Kuner; Andreas von Deimling; Wolfgang Wick; Frank Winkler Journal: Nature Date: 2015-11-04 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Timothy J Brown; Matthew C Brennan; Michael Li; Ephraim W Church; Nicholas J Brandmeir; Kevin L Rakszawski; Akshal S Patel; Elias B Rizk; Dima Suki; Raymond Sawaya; Michael Glantz Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2016-11-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Masahiro Hitomi; Loic P Deleyrolle; Erin E Mulkearns-Hubert; Awad Jarrar; Meizhang Li; Maksim Sinyuk; Balint Otvos; Sylvain Brunet; William A Flavahan; Christopher G Hubert; Winston Goan; James S Hale; Alvaro G Alvarado; Ao Zhang; Mark Rohaus; Muna Oli; Vinata Vedam-Mai; Jeff M Fortin; Hunter S Futch; Benjamin Griffith; Qiulian Wu; Chun-Hong Xia; Xiaohua Gong; Manmeet S Ahluwalia; Jeremy N Rich; Brent A Reynolds; Justin D Lathia Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2015-05-07 Impact factor: 9.423
Authors: Marike L Broekman; Sybren L N Maas; Erik R Abels; Thorsten R Mempel; Anna M Krichevsky; Xandra O Breakefield Journal: Nat Rev Neurol Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 42.937
Authors: Aleksandrs Krigers; Patrizia Moser; Helga Fritsch; Matthias Demetz; Konstantin Brawanski; Claudius Thomé; Christian F Freyschlag Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2021-06-26 Impact factor: 4.553