Literature DB >> 28419016

An Evaluation of a New Debriefing Framework: REFLECT.

Lauren E Zinns1, Paul C Mullan2, Karen J OʼConnell3, Leticia M Ryan4, Angela T Wratney5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postresuscitation debriefing (PRD) is recommended by the American Heart Association guidelines but is infrequently performed. Prior studies have identified barriers for pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) fellows including lack of a standardized curriculum.
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to create and assess the feasibility of a time-limited, structured PRD framework entitled REFLECT: Review the event, Encourage team participation, Focused feedback, Listen to each other, Emphasize key points, Communicate clearly, and Transform the future.
METHODS: Each PEM fellow (n = 9) at a single center was a team leader of a pre-intervention and post-intervention videotaped, simulated resuscitation followed by a facilitated team PRD. Our intervention was a 2-hour interactive, educational workshop on debriefing and the use of the REFLECT debriefing aid. Videos of the pre-intervention and post-intervention debriefings were blindly analyzed by video reviewers to assess for the presence of debriefing characteristics contained in the REFLECT debriefing aid. PEM fellow and team member assessments of the debriefings were completed after each pre-intervention and post-intervention simulation, and written evaluations by PEM fellows and team members were analyzed.
RESULTS: All 9 PEM fellows completed the study. There was an improvement in the pre-intervention and post-intervention assessment of the REFLECT debriefing characteristics as determined by fellow perception (63% to 83%, P < 0.01) and team member perception (63% to 82%, P < 0.001). All debriefings lasted less than 5 minutes. There was no statistical difference between pre-intervention and post-intervention debriefing time (P = 1.00).
CONCLUSIONS: REFLECT is a feasible debriefing aid designed to incorporate evidence-based characteristics into a PRD.

Year:  2020        PMID: 28419016     DOI: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care        ISSN: 0749-5161            Impact factor:   1.454


  6 in total

1.  Frameworks and quality measures used for debriefing in team-based simulation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ruth Endacott; Thomas Gale; Anita O'Connor; Samantha Dix
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2018-08-13

2.  Evolution of clinical event debriefs in a quaternary pediatric emergency department after implementation of a debriefing tool.

Authors:  Jamie Chu; Nawara Alawa; Esther M Sampayo; Cara Doughty; Elizabeth Camp; T Bram Welch-Horan
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2021-08-01

3.  A Newly Developed Interprofessional In-Situ Simulation-Based Training for Airway Management of COVID-19 Patients: Identification of Challenges and Safety Gaps, and Assessment of the Participants' Reaction.

Authors:  Abdulrahman Y Sabbagh; Hala M Alzaid; Abdullah A Almarshed; Amani A Azizalrahman; Shady Elmasry; Claudia A Rosu; Usamah Alzoraigi; Abdulrahman Alzahrani; Ameera A Cluntun
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2022-09-29

4.  Applications of Postresuscitation Debriefing Frameworks in Emergency Settings: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Stephen J Hale; Melissa J Parker; Cynthia Cupido; April J Kam
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2020-04-06

Review 5.  [Debriefing in pediatric emergency care].

Authors:  E Heimberg; J Daub; J B Schmutz; W Eppich; F Hoffmann
Journal:  Notf Rett Med       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 0.892

6.  "A debriefer must be neutral" and other debriefing myths: a systemic inquiry-based qualitative study of taken-for-granted beliefs about clinical post-event debriefing.

Authors:  Julia Carolin Seelandt; Katie Walker; Michaela Kolbe
Journal:  Adv Simul (Lond)       Date:  2021-03-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.