Literature DB >> 28418804

Determinants of Nonmedically Indicated In-Hospital Supplementation of Infants Whose Birthing Parents Intended to Exclusively Breastfeed.

Julia Temple Newhook1, Leigh Anne Newhook2,3, William K Midodzi2, Janet Murphy Goodridge4, Lorraine Burrage4, Nicole Gill5, Beth Halfyard5, Laurie Twells6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite high rates of intention to exclusively breastfeed, rates of exclusive breastfeeding in Canada are low. Supplementation may begin in hospital and is associated with reduced breastfeeding duration. Research aim: The aim of this investigation was to explore determinants of in-hospital nonmedically indicated supplementation of infants whose birthing parents intended to exclusively breastfeed.
METHODS: This study is a cross-sectional one-group nonexperimental design, focused on participants who intended to exclusively breastfeed for 6 months ( n = 496). Data were collected between October 2011 and October 2015 in Newfoundland and Labrador. Variables measured included age; rural/urban location; education; income; race; marital status; parity; smoking status; having been breastfed as an infant; previous breastfeeding experience; Iowa Infant Feeding Attitude Scale score; delivery mode; infant birth weight; birth satisfaction; skin-to-skin contact; length of participant's hospital stay; breastfeeding advice from a lactation consultant, registered nurse, or physician; and first impression of breastfeeding. We evaluated determinants of in-hospital nonmedically indicated supplementation using bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.
RESULTS: Overall, 16.9% ( n = 84) of infants received nonmedically indicated supplementation in hospital. Multivariate modeling revealed four determinants: low total prenatal Iowa Infant Feeding Attitude Scale score (odds ratio [OR] = 1.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.18, 3.27]), no previous breastfeeding experience (OR = 2.03, 95% CI [1.15, 3.61]), negative first impression of breastfeeding (OR = 2.67, 95% CI [1.61, 4.43]), and receiving breastfeeding advice from a hospital physician (OR = 2.86, 95% CI [1.59, 5.15]).
CONCLUSION: Elements of the hospital experience, self-efficacy, and attitudes toward infant feeding are determinants of nonmedically indicated supplementation of infants whose birthing parents intended to exclusively breastfeed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative; breastfeeding; breastfeeding barriers; breastfeeding initiation; breastfeeding support; exclusive breastfeeding; human milk substitute

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28418804     DOI: 10.1177/0890334417695204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Lact        ISSN: 0890-3344            Impact factor:   2.219


  4 in total

1.  Predictors of breast milk substitute feeding among newborns in delivery facilities in urban Cambodia and Nepal.

Authors:  Mary Champeny; Alissa M Pries; Kroeun Hou; Indu Adhikary; Elizabeth Zehner; Sandra L Huffman
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Reliability and Validity of the Greek Version of the Iowa Infant Feeding Attitude Scale Among Pregnant Women.

Authors:  Maria Iliadou; Katerina Lykeridou; Panagiotis Prezerakos; Chara Tzavara; Styliani G Tziaferi
Journal:  Mater Sociomed       Date:  2019-09

3.  Structured antenatal milk expression education for nulliparous pregnant people: results of a pilot, randomized controlled trial in the United States.

Authors:  Jill R Demirci; Melissa Glasser; Katherine P Himes; Susan M Sereika
Journal:  Int Breastfeed J       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 3.790

4.  Poverty and Breastfeeding: Comparing Determinants of Early Breastfeeding Cessation Incidence in Socioeconomically Marginalized and Privileged Populations in the FiNaL Study.

Authors:  Julia Temple Newhook; Leigh Anne Newhook; William K Midodzi; Janet Murphy Goodridge; Lorraine Burrage; Nicole Gill; Beth Halfyard; Laurie Twells
Journal:  Health Equity       Date:  2017-06-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.