Literature DB >> 28418481

Comparison of Recommended Eligibility for Primary Prevention Statin Therapy Based on the US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations vs the ACC/AHA Guidelines.

Neha J Pagidipati1, Ann Marie Navar1, Hillary Mulder1, Allan D Sniderman2, Eric D Peterson1, Michael J Pencina1.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: There are important differences among guideline recommendations for using statin therapy in primary prevention. New recommendations from the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) emphasize therapy based on the presence of 1 or more cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors and a 10-year global CVD risk of 10% or greater.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the difference in eligibility for primary prevention statin treatment among US adults, assuming full application of USPSTF recommendations compared with the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data (2009-2014) were used to assess statin eligibility under the 2016 USPSTF recommendations vs the 2013 ACC/AHA cholesterol guidelines among a nationally representative sample of 3416 US adults aged 40 to 75 years with fasting lipid data and triglyceride levels of 400 mg/dL or less, without prior CVD. EXPOSURES: The 2016 USPSTF recommendations vs 2013 ACC/AHA guidelines. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Eligibility for primary prevention statin therapy.
RESULTS: Among the US primary prevention population represented by 3416 individuals in NHANES, the median weighted age was 53 years (interquartile range, 46-61), and 53% (95% CI, 52%-55%) were women. Along with the 21.5% (95% CI, 19.3%-23.7%) of patients who reported currently taking lipid-lowering medication, full implementation of the USPSTF recommendations would be associated with initiation of statin therapy in an additional 15.8% (95% CI, 14.0%-17.5%) of patients, compared with an additional 24.3% (95% CI, 22.3%-26.3%) of patients who would be recommended for statin initiation under full implementation of the 2013 ACC/AHA guidelines. Among the 8.9% of individuals in the primary prevention population who would be recommended for statins by ACC/AHA guidelines but not by USPSTF recommendations, 55% would be adults aged 40 to 59 years with a mean 30-year cardiovascular risk greater than 30%, and 28% would have diabetes. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this sample of US adults from 2009-2014, adherence to the 2016 USPSTF recommendations for statin therapy, compared with the 2013 ACC/AHA guidelines, could lead to a lower number of individuals recommended for primary prevention statin therapy, including many younger adults with high mean long-term CVD risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28418481      PMCID: PMC5470349          DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.3416

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  10 in total

1.  Risk of Premature Cardiovascular Disease vs the Number of Premature Cardiovascular Events.

Authors:  Allan D Sniderman; George Thanassoulis; Ken Williams; Michael Pencina
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 14.676

2.  2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Neil J Stone; Jennifer G Robinson; Alice H Lichtenstein; C Noel Bairey Merz; Conrad B Blum; Robert H Eckel; Anne C Goldberg; David Gordon; Daniel Levy; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Patrick McBride; J Sanford Schwartz; Susan T Shero; Sidney C Smith; Karol Watson; Peter W F Wilson; Karen M Eddleman; Nicole M Jarrett; Ken LaBresh; Lev Nevo; Janusz Wnek; Jeffrey L Anderson; Jonathan L Halperin; Nancy M Albert; Biykem Bozkurt; Ralph G Brindis; Lesley H Curtis; David DeMets; Judith S Hochman; Richard J Kovacs; E Magnus Ohman; Susan J Pressler; Frank W Sellke; Win-Kuang Shen; Sidney C Smith; Gordon F Tomaselli
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  National health and nutrition examination survey: analytic guidelines, 1999-2010.

Authors:  Clifford L Johnson; Ryne Paulose-Ram; Cynthia L Ogden; Margaret D Carroll; Deanna Kruszon-Moran; Sylvia M Dohrmann; Lester R Curtin
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 2       Date:  2013-09

4.  Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge.

Authors:  W T Friedewald; R I Levy; D S Fredrickson
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 8.327

5.  Accuracy of the Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk Equation in a Large Contemporary, Multiethnic Population.

Authors:  Jamal S Rana; Grace H Tabada; Matthew D Solomon; Joan C Lo; Marc G Jaffe; Sue Hee Sung; Christie M Ballantyne; Alan S Go
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Statin Use for the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Adults: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.

Authors:  Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo; David C Grossman; Susan J Curry; Karina W Davidson; John W Epling; Francisco A R García; Matthew W Gillman; Alex R Kemper; Alex H Krist; Ann E Kurth; C Seth Landefeld; Michael L LeFevre; Carol M Mangione; William R Phillips; Douglas K Owens; Maureen G Phipps; Michael P Pignone
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  David C Goff; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Glen Bennett; Sean Coady; Ralph B D'Agostino; Raymond Gibbons; Philip Greenland; Daniel T Lackland; Daniel Levy; Christopher J O'Donnell; Jennifer G Robinson; J Sanford Schwartz; Susan T Shero; Sidney C Smith; Paul Sorlie; Neil J Stone; Peter W F Wilson
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Individualized Statin Benefit for Determining Statin Eligibility in the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  George Thanassoulis; Ken Williams; Kathleen Kimler Altobelli; Michael J Pencina; Christopher P Cannon; Allan D Sniderman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Predicting the 30-year risk of cardiovascular disease: the framingham heart study.

Authors:  Michael J Pencina; Ralph B D'Agostino; Martin G Larson; Joseph M Massaro; Ramachandran S Vasan
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Application of new cholesterol guidelines to a population-based sample.

Authors:  Michael J Pencina; Ann Marie Navar-Boggan; Ralph B D'Agostino; Ken Williams; Benjamin Neely; Allan D Sniderman; Eric D Peterson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 91.245

  10 in total
  21 in total

1.  Do Statins Increase the Risk of Esophageal Conditions? Findings from Four Propensity Score-Matched Analyses.

Authors:  Ioana Smith; Robert Schmidt; Ethan A Halm; Ishak A Mansi
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 2.  Emerging Role of Precision Medicine in Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Jane A Leopold; Joseph Loscalzo
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 17.367

3.  Association of Statin Use with Increased Risk of Musculoskeletal Conditions: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Una E Makris; Carlos A Alvarez; Eric M Mortensen; Ishak A Mansi
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  Limitations of Contemporary Guidelines for Managing Patients at High Genetic Risk of Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Krishna G Aragam; Amanda Dobbyn; Renae Judy; Mark Chaffin; Kumardeep Chaudhary; George Hindy; Andrew Cagan; Phoebe Finneran; Lu-Chen Weng; Ruth J F Loos; Girish Nadkarni; Judy H Cho; Rachel L Kember; Aris Baras; Jeffrey Reid; John Overton; Anthony Philippakis; Patrick T Ellinor; Scott T Weiss; Daniel J Rader; Steven A Lubitz; Jordan W Smoller; Elizabeth W Karlson; Amit V Khera; Sekar Kathiresan; Ron Do; Scott M Damrauer; Pradeep Natarajan
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Statin Use in Primary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease According to 5 Major Guidelines for Sensitivity, Specificity, and Number Needed to Treat.

Authors:  Martin Bødtker Mortensen; Børge Grønne Nordestgaard
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 14.676

Review 6.  Statins for Primary Prevention in Those Aged 70 Years and Older: A Critical Review of Recent Cholesterol Guidelines.

Authors:  Chelsea E Hawley; John Roefaro; Daniel E Forman; Ariela R Orkaby
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.923

7.  Clinical features related to statin-associated muscle symptoms.

Authors:  Heather M Ochs-Balcom; Ly Minh Nguyen; Changxing Ma; Paul J Isackson; Jasmine A Luzum; Joseph P Kitzmiller; Mark Tarnopolsky; Michael Weisman; Lisa Christopher-Stine; Wendy Peltier; Robert L Wortmann; Georgirene D Vladutiu
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 3.217

8.  Coronary CT Angiography and Carotid MRI Improve Phenotyping of Disease Extent Compared with ACC/AHA Risk Score Alone.

Authors:  Ashley Chorath; Younhee Choi; Evrim B Turkbey; Mark A Ahlman; Christopher T Sibley; Songtao Liu; David A Bluemke; Veit Sandfort
Journal:  Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging       Date:  2020-02-27

9.  Geographic Variation of Statin Use Among US Nursing Home Residents With Life-limiting Illness.

Authors:  Deborah S Mack; Jonggyu Baek; Jennifer Tjia; Kate L Lapane
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Differences in primary cardiovascular disease prevention between the 2013 and 2016 cholesterol guidelines and impact of the 2017 hypertension guideline in the United States.

Authors:  Brent M Egan; Jiexiang Li; Robert A Davis; Kevin A Fiscella; Jonathan N Tobin; Daniel W Jones; Angelo Sinopoli
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.