| Literature DB >> 28417943 |
Wioleta Pietrzak1, Renata Nowak2, Urszula Gawlik-Dziki3, Marta Kinga Lemieszek4, Wojciech Rzeski5,6.
Abstract
A new, rapid, sensitive and selective liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-MS/MS) method was developed to determine the content of flavonoid aglycones and phenolic acids in mistletoe berries (Viscum album L.) harvested from six different Polish host trees. Additionally, the total phenolic content (TPC) and total flavonoid content (TFC) as well as an antioxidant and antiproliferative activity were evaluated for the first time. The plant material was selectively extracted using ultrasound assisted maceration with methanol/water (8:2) solution. The obtained TPC and TFC results varied from 7.146 to 9.345 mg GA g-¹ and from 1.888 to 2.888 mg Q g-1 of dry extracts, respectively. The LC-ESI-MS/MS analysis demonstrated the highest content of phenolic acids in mistletoe berries from Populus nigra 'Italica' L. and flavonoid aglycones in mistletoe berries from Tilia cordata Mill. (354.45 µg and 5.955 µg per g dry extract, respectively). The moderate antioxidant activity of investigated extracts was obtained. The studies revealed that the examined extracts decreased the proliferation of human colon adenocarcinoma cells line LS180 in a dose-dependent manner without cytotoxicity in the human colon epithelial cell line CCD 841 CoTr. Moreover, the obtained results suggest considerable impact of polyphenols on the anticancer activity of these extracts.Entities:
Keywords: LC-MS/MS (mass spectrometry); Viscum album L.; antioxidant activity; antiproliferative activity; cytotoxicity; phenolic compound
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28417943 PMCID: PMC6154606 DOI: 10.3390/molecules22040624
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Total phenolic content (TPC) and flavonoid content (TFC) of methanol extracts from mistletoe berries harvested from various host trees.
| Species | Host Tree | TPC | TFC |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8.82 ± 0.18 ns | 0.365 ± 0.005 ns | ||
| 6.71 ± 0.32 * | 0.356 ± 0.006 ns | ||
| 9.66 ± 0.28 ns | 0.428 ± 0.007 ns | ||
| 10.43 ± 0.20 | 0.404 ± 0.017 | ||
| 4.78 ± 0.09 * | 0.286 ± 0.007 ns | ||
| 7.11 ± 0.20 ns | 0.270 ± 0.007 ns |
Values are presented in mean ± SEM, n = 3 and evaluated by one-way ANOVA (post test: Tukey) to compare each extract to Populus nigra ‘Italica’ L. extract. Differences were considered to be statistically significant if p < 0.05; ns–no significant differences; * p < 0.05.
Figure 1The chromatograms in MRM mode of standards solution of flavonoid aglycones occurring in mistletoe berries: 1–Eriodictiol; 2–Quercetin; 3–3-o-Methylquercetin; 4–Naringenin; 5–Isorhamnetin; 6–Sakuranetin; 7–Rhamnazin.
Flavonoid aglycones contents in extracts from mistletoe berries collected from different trees host. Values are presented in mean ± SEM, n = 3.
| Compound | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flavonoid aglycones (µg per g dry extracts) | ||||||
| Taxifolin | trace a | - b | trace a | trace a | trace a | - b |
| Myricetin | - b | - b | - b | - b | - b | - b |
| Morin | - b | - b | - b | - b | - b | - b |
| Eriodictiol | 0.011 ± 0.001 | trace a | 0.011 ± 0.001 | 0.014 ± 0.001 | 0.201 ± 0.01 | 0.001 ± 0.0001 |
| Luteolin | - b | - b | - b | trace a | - b | - b |
| Quercetin | trace a | 0.025 ± 0.0001 | 0.006 ± 0.0001 | 0.056 ± 0.003 | trace a | 0.026 ±0.0001 |
| 3- | 0.255 ± 0.002 | 0.163 ± 0.008 | 0.510 ± 0.020 | 0.532 ± 0.004 | 0.409 ± 0.02 | 0.009 ± 0.0001 |
| Apigenin | - b | - b | trace a | trace a | trace a | trace a |
| Naringenin | 0.111 ± 0.002 | 0.102 ± 0.002 | 0.427 ± 0.0001 | 0.681 ± 0.014 | 2.319 ± 0.046 | 0.251 ± 0.013 |
| Kaempferol | - b | - b | - b | trace a | - b | trace a |
| Isorhamnetin | trace a | 0.099 ± 0.005 | 0.106 ± 0.005 | 0.297 ± 0.006 | 1.794 ± 0.09 | 0.013 ± 0.001 |
| Rhamnetin | trace a | trace a | trace a | trace a | trace a | trace a |
| Chrysin | - b | - b | - b | - b | - b | - b |
| Sakuranetin | 0.014 ± 0.0001 | 0.001 ± 0.0002 | 0.054 ± 0.003 | 0.109 ± 0.0003 | 0.009 ± 0.0001 | 0.004 ± 0.0001 |
| Prunetin | - b | - b | - b | - b | - b | - b |
| Rhamnazin | 0.009 ± 0.0001 | 0.067 ± 0.003 | 0.122 ± 0.002 | 0.472 ± 0.024 | 1.223 ± 0.061 | 0.008 ± 0.0001 |
| TOTAL | 0.4 | 0.457 | 1.236 | 2.161 | 5.955 | 0.312 |
a trace–trace amounts; - b not detected.
Phenolic acid contents in extracts from mistletoe berries collected from different trees host. Values are presented in mean ± SEM, n = 3.
| Compound | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phenolic Acids (µg per g dry Extracts) | ||||||
| Gallic acid | 23.17 ± 0.58 | trace a | trace a | trace a | trace a | - b |
| Protocatechuic acid | 80.78 ± 0.57 | 40.88 ± 1.59 | 29.03 ± 1.45 | 31.07 ± 1.55 | trace a | trace a |
| Gentisic acid | - b | - b | trace a | 3.26 ± 0.16 | trace a | trace a |
| 4-OH-benzoic acid | 11.23 ± 0.11 | 5.20 ± 0.14 | 2.72 ± 0.14 | 0.79 ± 0.04 | 3.51 ± 0.18 | trace a |
| Vanilic acid | 26.1 ± 1.02 | Trace a | 43.9 ± 1.36 | 44.1 ± 2.21 | trace a | trace a |
| Caffeic acid | 12.78 ± 0.59 | 1.57 ± 0.08 | 34.74 ± 0.52 | 9.40 ± 0.12 | trace a | trace a |
| Syringic acid | 98.60 ± 0.69 | 24.90 ± 0.05 | 121.54 ± 1.58 | 137.99 ± 1.24 | 49.35 ± 0.1 | 25.77 ± 0.05 |
| 1.19 ± 0.03 | trace a | trace a | trace a | trace a | 7.07 ± 0.05 | |
| Ferulic acid | 4.65 ± 0.005 | 13.64 ± 0.67 | 6.94 ± 0.28 | 7.69 ± 0.08 | 6.66 ± 0.07 | 11.81 ± 0.01 |
| Salicylic acid | 4.32 ± 0.17 | 1.22 ± 0.01 | 5.18 ± 0.02 | 7.98 ± 0.07 | 0.12 ± 0.005 | 2.06 ± 0.03 |
| Veratric acid | - b | - b | - b | - b | - b | - b |
| Synapic acid | 78.50 ± 2.36 | 71.82 ± 0.43 | 107.08 ± 1.07 | 112.17 ± 1.79 | 84.80 ± 1.36 | 8.60 ± 0.09 |
| 3-OH-cinnamic acid | - b | - b | - b | - b | - b | - b |
| Rosmarinic acid | trace a | trace a | trace a | trace a | trace a | trace a |
| TOTAL | 341.32 | 159.23 | 351.13 | 354.45 | 144.44 | 55.31 |
a trace–trace amounts; - b not detected.
Antioxidant activity–reducing power (RED), metal chelating power (CHEL), Inhibition of linoleic acid peroxidation (LPO) and free radicals scavenging ability (ABTS•) in methanol extracts from mistletoe berries harvested from various host trees.
| Species | Host Trees | Antioxidant Activity (EC50 in mg mL−1 of extract) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RED | ABTS• | CHEL | LPO | ||
| 1.04 ± 0.02 ns | 8.06 ± 0.12 ns | 0.88 ± 0.18 * | 5.30 ± 0.03 * | ||
| 1.21 ± 0.02 ns | 13.03 ± 0.06 ** | 0.54 ± 0.03 ns | 7.55 ± 0.19 ** | ||
| 1.05 ± 0.01 ns | 7.72 ± 0.13 ** | 0.59 ± 0.10 ns | 6.60 ± 0.33 * | ||
| 1.08 ± 0.01 | 8.17 ± 0.02 | 0.54 ± 0.03 | 5.65 ± 0.44 | ||
| 0.92 ± 0.03 ns | 11.31 ± 0.14 ** | 0.45 ± 0.10 ns | 5.57 ± 0.43 ns | ||
| 1.33 ± 0.02 ns | 14.77 ± 0.25 ** | 0.60 ± 0.01 ns | 10.24 ± 0.25 ** | ||
Values are presented in mean ± SEM, n = 3 and evaluated by one-way ANOVA (post test: Tukey) to compare each extract to Populus nigra ‘Italica’ L. extract. Differences were considered to be statistically significant if p < 0.05; ns—no significant differences; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.
Pearson correlation coefficient and R2 coefficient showing relationship between total phenolic content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC) total phenolic acids content (LC-ESI-MS/MS), total flavonoid aglycones (LC-ESI-MS/MS) and EC50 (ABTS•) for mistletoes berries extracts from different host trees.
| Content/EC50 | R (X,Y) | R2 |
|---|---|---|
| TPC & EC50 (ABTS•) | −0.70 | 0.49 |
| TFC & EC50 (ABTS•) | −0.81 | 0.65 |
| Total phenolic acids content (LC-ESI-MS/MS) & EC50 (ABTS•) | −0.97 | 0.95 |
| Total flavonoid aglycones content (LC-ESI-MS/MS) & EC50 (ABTS•) | −0.07 | 0.01 |
Figure 2The influence of mistletoe berries extracts on the proliferation of human colon adenocarcinoma cell line LS180. Cells were exposed for 96 h (upper panel) or 48 h (bottom panel) to extracts isolated from berries of mistletoe harvested from Pinus sylvestris L. (A,D); Mill. (B,E); Populus nigra L. ‘Italica’ (C,F). Cell proliferation was quantified by MTT test (upper panel) or BrdU assay (bottom panel). Results are presented as the mean ± SEM of 4–5 measurements. *** p < 0.001 vs. control, one-way ANOVA test; post test: Tukey.
Figure 3Cytotoxicity of mistletoe berries extracts in human colon epithelial cell line CCD 841 CoTr. Cells were exposed for 48 h to extracts isolated from berries of mistletoe harvested from Pinus sylvestris L. (A); Mill. (B); Populus nigra L. ‘Italica’ (C). Extract cytotoxicity was measured by means of the LDH assay. Results are presented as the mean ± SEM of 4 measurements. * p < 0.05 vs. control, ** p < 0.01 vs. control, one-way ANOVA test; post test: Tukey.
Summary of optimized parameters for the quantitative analysis of flavonoid aglycones.
| Compound | Retention Time (min) | Q1 | Q3 | DP a
| EP b | CEP c | CE d | CXP e |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taxifolin | 6.17 | 302.7 | 124.9 | −45 | −3.5 | −18 | −26 | 0 |
| 284.8 | −45 | −3.5 | −18 | −14 | −4 | |||
| Myricetin | 6.47 | 316.7 | 136.9 | −55 | −9 | −14 | −32 | 0 |
| 150.9 | −55 | −9 | −14 | −26 | 0 | |||
| Morin | 6.82 | 300.7 | 124.9 | −50 | −3.5 | −20 | −24 | 0 |
| 106.9 | −50 | −3.5 | −20 | −30 | 0 | |||
| Eriodictiol | 7.07 | 286.7 | 134.9 | −45 | −6 | −12 | −32 | 0 |
| 150.9 | −45 | −6 | −12 | −18 | −2 | |||
| Luteolin | 7.08 | 284.7 | 132.9 | −75 | −9 | −18 | −38 | 0 |
| 150.9 | −75 | −9 | −18 | −26 | 0 | |||
| Quercetin | 7.13 | 300.7 | 150.9 | −60 | −2.5 | −12 | −26 | 0 |
| 178.8 | −60 | −2.5 | −12 | −20 | −2 | |||
| 3- | 7.32 | 314.7 | 299.8 | −55 | −9.5 | −22 | −18 | −4 |
| 270.8 | −55 | −9.5 | −22 | −26 | −4 | |||
| Apigenin | 7.77 | 268.8 | 117 | −70 | −9.5 | −12 | −44 | 0 |
| 106.8 | −70 | −9.5 | −12 | −34 | 0 | |||
| Naringenin | 7.81 | 270.8 | 119 | −50 | −11.5 | −12 | −34 | 0 |
| 150.9 | −50 | −11.5 | −12 | −22 | 0 | |||
| Kaempferol | 7.94 | 284.7 | 116.8 | −70 | −5 | −12 | −46 | 0 |
| 93 | −70 | −5 | −12 | −52 | 0 | |||
| Isorhamnetin | 8.09 | 314.7 | 299.7 | −65 | −2.5 | −26 | −20 | −4 |
| 150.9 | −65 | −2.5 | −26 | −30 | 0 | |||
| Rhamnetin | 8.85 | 314.7 | 165 | −60 | −5.5 | −18 | −24 | 0 |
| 120.9 | −60 | −5.5 | −18 | −36 | 0 | |||
| Chrysin | 9.83 | 252.8 | 208.9 | −80 | −10 | −14 | −22 | −2 |
| 142.9 | −80 | −10 | −14 | −26 | 0 | |||
| Sakuranetin | 9.89 | 284.7 | 118.9 | −60 | −5.5 | −12 | −34 | 0 |
| 164.8 | -60 | -5.5 | −12 | −20 | −2 | |||
| Prunetin | 10.18 | 282.8 | 267.7 | −55 | −12 | −18 | −20 | −4 |
| 238.7 | −55 | −12 | −18 | −26 | −2 | |||
| Rhamnazin | 10.31 | 328.7 | 270.8 | −70 | −3 | −28 | −26 | −2 |
| 313.8 | −70 | −3 | −28 | −14 | −4 |
a DP–Declustering Potential; - b EP–Entrance Potential; c CEP–Cell Entrance Potential; d CE–Collision Energy; e CXP–Collision Cell Exit Potential.
Analytical parameters of LC-MS/MS quantitative method.
| Compound | LOD | LOQ | R2 | Linearity Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taxifolin | 0.015 | 0.05 | 0.9972 | 0.05–5 |
| Myricetin | 0.002 | 0.004 | 0.9959 | 0.011–3.6 |
| Morin | 0.0015 | 0.003 | 0.9951 | 0.01–5 |
| Eriodictiol | 0.005 | 0.015 | 0.9976 | 0.015–5 |
| Luteolin | 0.024 | 0.04 | 0.9961 | 0.04–4 |
| Quercetin | 0.0015 | 0.003 | 0.9960 | 0.031–3.1 |
| 3- | 0.001 | 0.002 | 0.9962 | 0.011–3.7 |
| Apigenin | 0.003 | 0.004 | 0.9952 | 0.012–6.3 |
| Naringenin | 0.025 | 0.033 | 0.9959 | 0.033–3.3 |
| Kaempferol | 0.02 | 0.033 | 0.9973 | 0.033–20 |
| Isorhamnetin | 0.012 | 0.024 | 0.9965 | 0.04–60 |
| Rhamnetin | 0.002 | 0.006 | 0.9955 | 0.006–0.625 |
| Chrysin | 0.025 | 0.042 | 0.9954 | 0.042–2.5 |
| Sakuranetin | 0.034 | 0.046 | 0.9955 | 0.072–7.2 |
| Prunetin | 0.05 | 0.075 | 0.9967 | 0.2–20 |
| Rhamnazin | 0.054 | 0.072 | 0.9962 | 0.072–7.2 |