Literature DB >> 28417855

Optimization of Pediatric PET/CT.

Marguerite T Parisi1, Mohammed S Bermo2, Adam M Alessio3, Susan E Sharp4, Michael J Gelfand4, Barry L Shulkin5.   

Abstract

PET/CT, the most common form of hybrid imaging, has transformed oncologic imaging and is increasingly being used for nononcologic applications as well. Performing PET/CT in children poses unique challenges. Not only are children more sensitive to the effects of radiation than adults but, following radiation exposure, children have a longer postexposure life expectancy in which to exhibit adverse radiation effects. Both the PET and CT components of the study contribute to the total patient radiation dose, which is one of the most important risks of the study in this population. Another risk in children, not typically encountered in adults, is potential neurotoxicity related to the frequent need for general anesthesia in this patient population. Optimizing pediatric PET/CT requires making improvements to both the PET and the CT components of the procedure while decreasing the potential for risk. This can be accomplished through judicious performance of imaging, the use of recommended pediatric 18fluorine-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (18F-FDG) administered activities, thoughtful selection of pediatric-specific CT imaging parameters, careful patient preparation, and use of appropriate patient immobilization. In this article, we will review a variety of strategies for radiation dose optimization in pediatric 18F-FDG-PET/CT focusing on these processes. Awareness of and careful selection of pediatric-specific CT imaging parameters designed for appropriate diagnostic, localization, or attenuation correction only CT, in conjunction with the use of recommended radiotracer administered activities, will help to ensure image quality while limiting patient radiation exposure. Patient preparation, an important determinant of image quality, is another focus of this review. Appropriate preparative measures are even more crucial in children in whom there is a higher incidence of brown fat, which can interfere with study interpretation. Finally, we will discuss measures to improve the patient experience, the resource use, the departmental workflow, and the diagnostic performance of the study through the use of appropriate technology, all in the context of minimizing procedure-related risks.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28417855     DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2017.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Nucl Med        ISSN: 0001-2998            Impact factor:   4.446


  18 in total

Review 1.  Clinical pediatric positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance program: a guide to successful implementation.

Authors:  Sandra Saade-Lemus; Elad Nevo; Iman Soliman; Hansel J Otero; Ralph W Magee; Elizabeth T Drum; Lisa J States
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2020-02-19

2.  Image quality and lesion detectability in low-dose pediatric 18F-FDG scans using total-body PET/CT.

Authors:  Yu-Mo Zhao; Ying-He Li; Tao Chen; Wei-Guang Zhang; Lin-Hao Wang; Jiatai Feng; Chenwei Li; Xu Zhang; Wei Fan; Ying-Ying Hu
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Quantitative analysis of image metrics for reduced and standard dose pediatric 18F-FDG PET/MRI examinations.

Authors:  Pietro Zucchetta; Marco Branchini; Alessandra Zorz; Valentina Bodanza; Diego Cecchin; Marta Paiusco; Franco Bui
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Operational and Dosimetric Aspects of Pediatric PET/CT.

Authors:  Frederic H Fahey; Alison Goodkind; Robert D MacDougall; Leah Oberg; Sonja I Ziniel; Richard Cappock; Michael J Callahan; Neha Kwatra; S Ted Treves; Stephan D Voss
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Recent Survey of Effective Doses of F-18 FDG Torso PET/CT in Korea and the Current Recommendations for CT Protocols of PET/CT.

Authors:  Ari Chong; Jung Mi Park; Kyoungjune Pak; Yong-Il Kim; Hyun Woo Kwon; Eun Seong Lee; Ki Pyo Nam; Ho-Young Lee; Hong Jae Lee; Ik Dong Yoo; Jae Seon Eo; Ji Young Kim; Joon-Kee Yoon; Kyeong Min Kim; Seong Min Kim; Tae-Sung Kim
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-07-20

Review 6.  Clinical application of 18F-DOPA PET/TC in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Gabriele Masselli; Emanuele Casciani; Cristina De Angelis; Saadi Sollaku; Gianfranco Gualdi
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-04-15

Review 7.  PET/CT in pediatric oncology.

Authors:  Gabriele Masselli; Cristina De Angelis; Saadi Sollaku; Emanuele Casciani; Gianfranco Gualdi
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-04-15

Review 8.  Imaging for diagnosis, staging and response assessment of Hodgkin lymphoma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  Kathleen M McCarten; Helen R Nadel; Barry L Shulkin; Steve Y Cho
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-10-16

9.  Investigating Low-Dose Image Quality in Whole-Body Pediatric 18F-FDG Scans Using Time-of-Flight PET/MRI.

Authors:  Jeffrey P Schmall; Suleman Surti; Hansel J Otero; Sabah Servaes; Joel S Karp; Lisa J States
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 11.082

10.  Radar based technology for non-contact monitoring of accumulation of blood in the head: A numerical study.

Authors:  Moshe Oziel; Rafi Korenstein; Boris Rubinsky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.