Antonio Tancredi1,2, Antonello Cuttitta1, Roberto Scaramuzzi1,2,3, Gerardo Scaramuzzi1, Marco Taurchini1. 1. Department of General Surgery and Thoracic Surgery, IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza Hospital, Foggia, Italy. 2. Department of Emergency, IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza Hospital, Foggia, Italy. 3. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study is to show the predictive value of the preoperative resting pressure of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) correlated with the type of fundoplication (Nissen or Dor) after Heller myotomy in our series. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 1998 to June 2010, 88 patients affected by esophageal achalasia underwent surgery at our unit. However, our study focused on a sample of 36 patients, because many data were lost or was never recorded. Among these, 14 patients underwent laparoscopic Heller myotomy plus Nissen fundoplication (group N), whereas 22 patients underwent laparoscopic Heller myotomy plus Dor fundoplication (group D). Clinical evaluation was performed using a modified DeMeester symptom scoring system consisting of the assessment of three symptoms: dysphagia, regurgitation, and heartburn. To each symptom was assigned a score from 0 to 3, depending on its severity, and the reduction in the severity of each symptom after surgery was assessed. RESULTS: The surgical treatment is considered to be effective (p<0.0001). The preoperative resting pressures of LES were compared by Student's t-test, and it was found that patients who reported a greater improvement in the dysphagia symptom had a preoperative average pressure of LES that was significantly higher than that in other patients in both group N (p=0.03) and group D (p=0.01; p=0.003; p=0.001). The Dor treatment was shown to be more effective than the Nissen treatment (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: The preoperative resting pressure of LES is a predictive factor of surgical success both before Dor fundoplication and before Nissen fundoplication, but its predictive power is influenced by the chosen type of fundoplication.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study is to show the predictive value of the preoperative resting pressure of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) correlated with the type of fundoplication (Nissen or Dor) after Heller myotomy in our series. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 1998 to June 2010, 88 patients affected by esophageal achalasia underwent surgery at our unit. However, our study focused on a sample of 36 patients, because many data were lost or was never recorded. Among these, 14 patients underwent laparoscopic Heller myotomy plus Nissen fundoplication (group N), whereas 22 patients underwent laparoscopic Heller myotomy plus Dor fundoplication (group D). Clinical evaluation was performed using a modified DeMeester symptom scoring system consisting of the assessment of three symptoms: dysphagia, regurgitation, and heartburn. To each symptom was assigned a score from 0 to 3, depending on its severity, and the reduction in the severity of each symptom after surgery was assessed. RESULTS: The surgical treatment is considered to be effective (p<0.0001). The preoperative resting pressures of LES were compared by Student's t-test, and it was found that patients who reported a greater improvement in the dysphagia symptom had a preoperative average pressure of LES that was significantly higher than that in other patients in both group N (p=0.03) and group D (p=0.01; p=0.003; p=0.001). The Dor treatment was shown to be more effective than the Nissen treatment (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: The preoperative resting pressure of LES is a predictive factor of surgical success both before Dor fundoplication and before Nissen fundoplication, but its predictive power is influenced by the chosen type of fundoplication.
Entities:
Keywords:
Achalasia; dysphagia; fundoplication; predictive factors; preoperative resting pressure of LES
Authors: Yutaka Shiino; Ziad T Awad; Gleb R Haynatzki; Richard E Davis; Ronald A Hinder; Charles J Filipi Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Robert E Kraichely; Gianrico Farrugia; Sean J Pittock; Donald O Castell; Vanda A Lennon Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2009-06-05 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Giovanni Zaninotto; Mario Costantini; Christian Rizzetto; Lisa Zanatta; Emanuela Guirroli; Giuseppe Portale; Loredana Nicoletti; Francesco Cavallin; Giorgio Battaglia; Alberto Ruol; Ermanno Ancona Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Guilherme M Campos; Eric Vittinghoff; Charlotte Rabl; Mark Takata; Michael Gadenstätter; Feng Lin; Ruxandra Ciovica Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Gianmattia del Genio; Gianluca Rossetti; Luigi Brusciano; Paolo Limongelli; Francesco Pizza; Salvatore Tolone; Landino Fei; Vincenzo Maffettone; Vincenzo Napolitano; Alberto del Genio Journal: World J Surg Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 3.352