Literature DB >> 28416547

Simulating Intestinal Transporter and Enzyme Activity in a Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model for Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate.

Darren M Moss1,2, Paul Domanico3, Melynda Watkins3, Seonghee Park4, Ryan Randolph4, Steve Wring4, Rajith Kumar Reddy Rajoli2, James Hobson2, Steve Rannard2, Marco Siccardi2, Andrew Owen2.   

Abstract

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), a prodrug of tenofovir, has oral bioavailability (25%) limited by intestinal transport (P-glycoprotein), and intestinal degradation (carboxylesterase). However, the influence of luminal pancreatic enzymes is not fully understood. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling has utility for estimating drug exposure from in vitro data. This study aimed to develop a PBPK model that included luminal enzyme activity to inform dose reduction strategies. TDF and tenofovir stability in porcine pancrelipase concentrations was assessed (0, 0.48, 4.8, 48, and 480 U/ml of lipase; 1 mM TDF; 37°C; 0 to 30 min). Samples were analyzed using mass spectrometry. TDF stability and permeation data allowed calculation of absorption rates within a human PBPK model to predict plasma exposure following 6 days of once-daily dosing with 300 mg of TDF. Regional absorption of drug was simulated across gut segments. TDF was degraded by pancrelipase (half-lives of 0.07 and 0.62 h using 480 and 48 U/ml, respectively). Previously reported maximum concentration (Cmax; 335 ng/ml), time to Cmax (Tmax; 2.4 h), area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC0-24; 3,045 ng · h/ml), and concentration at 24 h (C24; 48.3 ng/ml) were all within a 0.5-fold difference from the simulated Cmax (238 ng/ml), Tmax (3 h), AUC0-24 (3,036 ng · h/ml), and C24 (42.7 ng/ml). Simulated TDF absorption was higher in duodenum and jejunum than in ileum (p<0.05). These data support that TDF absorption is limited by the action of intestinal lipases. Our results suggest that bioavailability may be improved by protection of drug from intestinal transporters and enzymes, for example, by coadministration of enzyme-inhibiting agents or nanoformulation strategies.
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HAART; HIV; bioavailability; physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling; tenofovir disoproxil fumarate

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28416547      PMCID: PMC5487657          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00105-17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  26 in total

1.  Prediction of pharmacokinetics prior to in vivo studies. 1. Mechanism-based prediction of volume of distribution.

Authors:  Patrick Poulin; Frank-Peter Theil
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.534

2.  Comparison of human duodenum and Caco-2 gene expression profiles for 12,000 gene sequences tags and correlation with permeability of 26 drugs.

Authors:  Duxin Sun; Hans Lennernas; Lynda S Welage; Jeffery L Barnett; Christopher P Landowski; David Foster; David Fleisher; Kyung-Dall Lee; Gordon L Amidon
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  Application of PBPK modeling to predict human intestinal metabolism of CYP3A substrates - an evaluation and case study using GastroPlus.

Authors:  Aki T Heikkinen; Guillaume Baneyx; Antonello Caruso; Neil Parrott
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Sci       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 4.384

4.  Prediction of human intestinal first-pass metabolism of 25 CYP3A substrates from in vitro clearance and permeability data.

Authors:  Michael Gertz; Anthony Harrison; J Brian Houston; Aleksandra Galetin
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 3.922

Review 5.  An improved model to predict physiologically based model parameters and their inter-individual variability from anthropometry.

Authors:  Sieto Bosgra; Jan van Eijkeren; Peter Bos; Marco Zeilmaker; Wout Slob
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 5.635

Review 6.  Production of antiretroviral drugs in middle- and low-income countries.

Authors:  Eloan dos Santos Pinheiro; Karin Brüning; M Fernanda Macedo; Antonio C Siani
Journal:  Antivir Ther       Date:  2014-10-13

7.  Species-dependent and site-specific intestinal metabolism of ester prodrugs.

Authors:  J Van Gelder; M Shafiee; E De Clercq; F Penninckx; G Van den Mooter; R Kinget; P Augustijns
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 5.875

Review 8.  Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate: clinical pharmacology and pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Brian P Kearney; John F Flaherty; Jaymin Shah
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.

Authors:  Joel E Gallant; Stanley Deresinski
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2003-09-12       Impact factor: 9.079

10.  Development of a Novel Formulation That Improves Preclinical Bioavailability of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate.

Authors:  Melynda E Watkins; Steve Wring; Ryan Randolph; Seonghee Park; Kendall Powell; Lissa Lutz; Michelle Nowakowski; Ram Ramabhadran; Paul L Domanico
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 3.534

View more
  1 in total

1.  Increased tenofovir monoester concentrations in patients receiving tenofovir disoproxil fumarate with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir.

Authors:  Kristina M Brooks; Jose R Castillo-Mancilla; Joshua Blum; Ryan Huntley; Samantha MaWhinney; Keisha Alexander; Becky Jo Kerr; Lucas Ellison; Lane R Bushman; Christine E MacBrayne; Peter L Anderson; Jennifer J Kiser
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 5.790

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.