Literature DB >> 28416195

Pitavastatin versus pravastatin in adults with HIV-1 infection and dyslipidaemia (INTREPID): 12 week and 52 week results of a phase 4, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, superiority trial.

Judith A Aberg1, Craig A Sponseller2, Douglas J Ward3, Vladimir A Kryzhanovski4, Stuart E Campbell5, Melanie A Thompson6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: People living with HIV-1 infection are at greater risk for cardiovascular disease than seronegative adults. Treatment of dyslipidaemia with statins has been challenging in people with HIV because of an increased potential for drug interactions due to competing cytochrome P450 metabolism between statins and commonly used antiretroviral agents. Neither pitavastatin nor pravastatin depend on cytochrome P450 for primary metabolism. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of pitavastatin versus pravastatin in adults with HIV and dyslipidaemia.
METHODS: In the INTREPID (HIV-infected patieNts and TREatment with PItavastatin vs pravastatin for Dyslipidemia) randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, phase 4 trial (INTREPID, we recruited adults aged 18-70 years with controlled HIV (with CD4 counts >200 cells per μL and HIV-1 RNA <200 copies per mL) on antiretroviral therapy for at least 6 months and dyslipidaemia (LDL cholesterol 3·4-5·7 mmol/L and triglycerides ≤4·5 mmol/L) from 45 sites in the USA and Puerto Rico. Patients being treated with darunavir, or who had homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia or any condition causing secondary dyslipidaemia, or a history of statin intolerance, diabetes, or coronary artery disease were not eligible. We randomly assigned patients (1:1) to pitavastatin 4 mg or pravastatin 40 mg with matching placebos once daily orally for 12 weeks, followed by a 40 week safety extension. Randomisation was stratified by viral hepatitis B or C coinfection and computer-generated. Investigators, patients, study staff, and those assessing outcomes were masked to treatment group. The primary endpoint was percentage change in fasting serum LDL cholesterol from baseline to week 12 and the primary efficacy analysis was done in the modified intention-to-treat population. The safety analysis included all patients who took at least one dose of study medication. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01301066.
FINDINGS: Between Feb 23, 2011, and March 29, 2013, we randomly assigned 252 patients to the pitavastatin (n=126) or pravastatin group (n=126). LDL cholesterol reduction was 31·1% with pitavastatin and 20·9% with pravastatin (least squares mean difference -9·8%, 95% CI -13·8 to -5·9; p<0·0001) at 12 weeks. At week 52, four patients (3%) in the pitavastatin group and six (5%) in the pravastatin group had virological failure, with no significant difference between treatments. Both treatments had neutral effects on glucose metabolism parameters. 85 patients treated with pitavastatin (68%) and 88 patients treated with pravastatin (70%) reported treatment-emergent adverse events, and these caused study discontinuation in six patients (5%) versus five patients (4%). No serious adverse event occurred in more than one participant and none were treatment-related according to investigator assessment. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were diarrhoea in the pitavastatin group (n=12, 10%) and upper respiratory tract infection in the pravastatin group (n=14, 11%). 11 treatment-emergent serious adverse events were noted in seven patients (6%) in the pitavastatin group (atrial septal defect, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chest pain, diverticulitis, enterovesical fistula, gastroenteritis, viral gastroenteritis, herpes dermatitis, multiple fractures, respiratory failure, and transient ischaemic attack) and four events in three patients (2%) in the pravastatin group (cerebrovascular accident, arteriosclerosis coronary artery, myocardial infraction, and muscle haemorrhage). In the pravastatin treatment group, one additional patient discontinued due to an adverse event (prostate cancer that was diagnosed during the screening period, 42 days before first dose of study treatment, and therefore was not a treatment-emergent adverse event).
INTERPRETATION: The INTREPID results support guideline recommendations for pitavastatin as a preferred drug in the treatment of dyslipidaemia in people with HIV. FUNDING: Kowa Pharmaceuticals America and Eli Lilly and Company.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28416195     DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3018(17)30075-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet HIV        ISSN: 2352-3018            Impact factor:   12.767


  29 in total

1.  Rationale and design of the Randomized Trial to Prevent Vascular Events in HIV (REPRIEVE).

Authors:  Steven K Grinspoon; Kathleen V Fitch; Edgar Turner Overton; Carl J Fichtenbaum; Markella V Zanni; Judith A Aberg; Carlos Malvestutto; Michael T Lu; Judith S Currier; Craig A Sponseller; Myron Waclawiw; Beverly Alston-Smith; Katharine Cooper-Arnold; Karin L Klingman; Patrice Desvigne-Nickens; Udo Hoffmann; Heather J Ribaudo; Pamela S Douglas
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 2.  Probing the Interface of HIV and Inflammaging.

Authors:  Scott F Sieg; Carey L Shive; Soumya Panigrahi; Michael L Freeman
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 5.071

3.  Physical Function Impairment and Frailty in Middle-Aged People Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus in the REPRIEVE Trial Ancillary Study PREPARE.

Authors:  Triin Umbleja; Todd T Brown; Edgar T Overton; Heather J Ribaudo; Jennifer A Schrack; Kathleen V Fitch; Pamela S Douglas; Steven K Grinspoon; Sarah Henn; Roberto C Arduino; Benigno Rodriguez; Constance A Benson; Kristine M Erlandson
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 4.  HIV infection and coronary heart disease: mechanisms and management.

Authors:  Priscilla Y Hsue; David D Waters
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 5.  Cardiovascular disease risk among women living with HIV in North America and Europe.

Authors:  Lauren Stone; Sara E Looby; Markella V Zanni
Journal:  Curr Opin HIV AIDS       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.283

Review 6.  Noncommunicable diseases in adolescents with perinatally acquired HIV-1 infection in high-income and low-income settings.

Authors:  Steve Innes; Kunjal Patel
Journal:  Curr Opin HIV AIDS       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 4.283

7.  Residual inflammatory risk after contemporary lipid lowering therapy.

Authors:  Haris Riaz; Safi U Khan; Noman Lateef; Swapna Talluri; Muhammad Shahzeb Khan; Milind Y Desai
Journal:  Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes       Date:  2020-04-01

Review 8.  Benefits and Risks of Statin Therapy in the HIV-Infected Population.

Authors:  Mosepele Mosepele; Onkabetse J Molefe-Baikai; Steven K Grinspoon; Virginia A Triant
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2018-05-26       Impact factor: 3.725

9.  Differential Plasma Protein Regulation and Statin Effects in Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-Infected and Non-HIV-Infected Patients Utilizing a Proteomics Approach.

Authors:  Chris deFilippi; Mabel Toribio; Lai Ping Wong; Ruslan Sadreyev; Ida Grundberg; Kathleen V Fitch; Markella V Zanni; Janet Lo; Craig A Sponseller; Emmett Sprecher; Narges Rashidi; Melanie A Thompson; Diana Cagliero; Judith A Aberg; Laurie R Braun; Takara L Stanley; Hang Lee; Steven K Grinspoon
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 5.226

10.  HIV-Nef Protein Transfer to Endothelial Cells Requires Rac1 Activation and Leads to Endothelial Dysfunction Implications for Statin Treatment in HIV Patients.

Authors:  Sarvesh Chelvanambi; Samir K Gupta; Xingjuan Chen; Bradley W Ellis; Bernhard F Maier; Tyler M Colbert; Jithin Kuriakose; Pinar Zorlutuna; Paul Jolicoeur; Alexander G Obukhov; Matthias Clauss
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 17.367

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.