| Literature DB >> 28416006 |
Rym Chamakh-Ayari1,2, Mehdi Chenik1, Ahmed Sahbi Chakroun3, Narges Bahi-Jaber4, Karim Aoun1, Amel Meddeb-Garnaoui5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We previously identified a Leishmania (L.) major large RAB GTPase (LmlRAB), a new atypical RAB GTPase protein. It is highly conserved in Leishmania species while displaying low level of homology with mammalian homologues. Leishmania small RAB GTPases proteins have been involved in regulation of exocytic and endocytic pathways whereas the role of large RAB GTPases proteins has not been characterized yet. We report here the immunogenicity of both recombinant rLmlRAB and rLmlRABC, in individuals with immunity against L. major or L. infantum.Entities:
Keywords: Cross-protection; Human leishmaniasis; Leishmania; RAB GTPase; Vaccine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28416006 PMCID: PMC5393016 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-017-2127-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Study population
| Status | Group ID | Number | Average age |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cured from CL | CCLm | 30 | 43.34 ± 13.07 |
|
| Healthy high responder ( | HHR | 18 | 39.17 ± 10.40 |
|
| Healthy high responder ( | HHR | 26 | 35.75 ± 9.55 |
|
| Healthy low responders | HLR | 17 | 30.76 ± 5.73 | – |
Abbreviations: CCLm Cured from cutaneous leishmaniasis due to L. major, HHRLm Healthy High Responders (L. major), HHRLi Healthy High Responders (L. infantum), HLR, naïves control
The recruitment and peripheral blood sampling of different groups including cured from CL due to L. major (CCLm) and individuals with a probable asymptomatic L. major (HHRLm) or L. infantum infection (HHRLi), were performed in endemic foci for CL due to L. major and VL due to L. infantum. Healthy individuals with no history of leishmaniasis, used as naïve controls (HLR) were recruited from a low-endemic area
Primers used for cloning of LmlRAB and LmlRABC and plasmid constructions
| Name | Type | Primer sequences | Primer sequences | Restriction site |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| F-Ras1a | Forward | rlmlrab | 5′-GCC | NdeI |
| F-Ras3a | Forward | rlmlrabC | 5′GCC | NdeI |
| R-Ras3b | Reverse | rlmlrab/rlmlrabC | 5′-GCC | NotI |
Reverse and forward primers containing at their 5′ end a restriction site (underlined) were used to amplify the full length LmlRAB ORF and its carboxyl part LmlRABC. The amplified double-stranded DNA were first digested with NdeI and NotI and then inserted into the corresponding cloning sites in the pET-22b + vector (Novagen)
Fig. 1Expression of recombinant rLmlRAB and rLmlRABC in E. coli. Recombinant rLmlRAB as well as its carboxyl terminal part rLmlRABC were synthesized in BL21, purified by affinity chromatography over Ni-NTA resin. Western blot analysis shows the reactivity of the polyclonal anti-LmlRAB against the insoluble fraction of E. coli expressing both proteins rLmlRAB (a Lane 1) and LmlRABC (b Lane 1). The purified proteins rLmlRAB (a Lane 2) and rLmlRAB (b Lane 2) were also analyzed
Similarity ratios produced by pairwise alignment of LmlRab with Leishmania strains ortholog sequences
|
| Chromosome/Gene ID | Genomic coordinates | Producta | Similarity % | Similarity % | Similarity % | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| N-ter | C-Ter | |||||||
| AY962589.1 | AY962589.1 | AY962589.1 | |||||||
| N (%) | P (%) | N (%) | P (%) | N (%) | P (%) | ||||
|
| LmjF.31.0860 | 315900–317732 (–) | ras-like small GTPases, putative | 99.60 | 98.90 | 99.5 | 98.9 | 99.6 | 98.8 |
|
| JH605118.1 | 298109–299941 (–) | not yet annotated | 99.60 | 98.90 | 99.5 | 98.8 | 99.5 | 98.9 |
|
| KB217892.1 | 1129713–1131545 | not yet annotated | 99.50 | 98.70 | 99.5 | 98.9 | 99.6 | 98.6 |
|
| LinJ.31.0890 | 322703–324532 (–) | ras-like small GTPases, putative | 94.40 | 91.00 | 94.00 | 94.5 | 93.0 | 89.3 |
|
| LdBPK_310890.1 | 329426–331255 (–) | not yet annotated | 93.30 | 90.80 | 94.2 | 95.1 | 92.6 | 88.6 |
|
| KE147396.1 | 108776–110605 (–) | not yet annotated | 94.30 | 90.70 | 90.4 | 94.0 | 87.1 | 89.0 |
|
| KE147396.1 | 100399–102228 (–) | not yet annotated | 94.30 | 90.70 | 95.4 | 95.1 | 93.6 | 89.3 |
|
| LmxM.30.0860 | 324259–326091 (–) | ras-like small GTPases, putative | 93.10 | 90.50 | 96.2 | 90.2 | 88.0 | 79.4 |
|
| KE390271.1 | 700–2532 | not yet annotated | 94.20 | 90.50 | 90.4 | 89.6 | 87.1 | 78.3 |
|
| AUMB01001544.1 | 10483–12315 | not yet annotated | 88.70 | 82.70 | 95.4 | 93.4 | 93.8 | 89.5 |
|
| AUMB01001560.1 | 101–1933 | not yet annotated | 88.10 | 81.70 | 95.4 | 93.4 | 93.8 | 89.5 |
|
| LbrM.31.1020 | 360616–362445 (–) | ras-like small GTPases, putative | 74.50 | 63.80 | 78.1 | 74.3 | 72.9 | 59.3 |
|
| LbrM2903_31_1140 | 408882–410711 (–) | ras-like small GTPases, putative | 74.40 | 63.70 | 78.3 | 74.3 | 72.9 | 59.3 |
aAccording to TriTrypDB release 24 (15/04/2015) www.tritrypdb.org
For each of the selected Leishmania strains, the chromosome (or gene ID if chromosome were not assembled yet), the genomic coordinates and the gene product as described in the TriTrypDB server (Release 24 of 15/04/2015) is provided. Similarity ratios were drawn from pairwise alignments of both nucleic (columns noted “N”) and peptidic (columns noted “P”) sequences, regarding the entire gene sequence (column named “L. major HV P25 (Tunisia)”), the so called N-terminal region ranging from residue 1 to 183 (column named “N Ter”) and the so called C-terminal region ranging from residue 184 to 611 (column named “C Ter”)
Fig. 2Local alignment of specific Rab GTPase like protein domains. Domains were first identified and extracted from the L. major HV P25 Rab GTPase like sequence and from its selection of orthologs, then aligned. The alignment was edited in a way to shed light on the variable sites by marking all identical residues with dots
Fig. 3rLmlRAB and rLmlRABC specific IFN-γ, granzyme B, IL-10 and TNF-α responses. a IFN-γ, b granzyme B, c IL-10 and d TNF-α were detected and quantified from culture supernatants of PBMC (106 cells/ml) stimulated for 120 h with SLA (10 μg/ml), rLmlRAB or rLmlRABC (10 μg/ml). IFN-γ and IL-10 production were measured by ELISA. Granzyme B and TNF-α were measured using CBA and data were analyzed by flow cytometry. PHA (10 μg/ml) was used as positive control (data not shown). Bars indicate the median value for IFN-γ (a) and IL-10 (c) and the mean value for granzyme B (b) and TNF-α (d). Statistically significant differences were only shown for rLmlRAB or rLmlRABC, and were performed in each group and between groups (P ≤ 0.01)
Fig. 4Phenotype of IFN-γ producing cells. PBMC were stimulated with PMA (50 ng/ml)/ionomicyn (10–6 M) for 6 h (positive controls), SLA (10 μg/ml), rLmlRAB or rLmlRABC (10 μg/ml) for 120 h. For intracellular IFN-γ detection, cells were treated with Golgistop for the last 6 h of culture, fixed and permeabilized using BD Cytoperm/cytofix kit. Data were analyzed by BD FACS Canto II. Results represent the frequency of IFN-γ producing cells among the CD3 + CD4+ (a) and CD3 + CD8+ (b) cell populations. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare percentage of cells producing INF-γ (horizontal bars inside the box indicate median values). *Statistically significant differences from stimulated and non-stimulated cultures (P < 0.05)