| Literature DB >> 28415971 |
Kevin Chen1, Carl J Franz1, Hongbing Jiang1, Yanfang Jiang1, David Wang2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Caenorhabditis elegans is a powerful model organism for probing many biological processes including host-pathogen interactions with bacteria and fungi. The recent identification of nematode viruses that naturally infect C. elegans and Caenorhabditis briggsae provides a unique opportunity to define host-virus interactions in these model hosts.Entities:
Keywords: C. briggsae; C. elegans; Host-virus interaction; N. parisii; Orsay virus; Pathogen infection; Santeuil virus; Transcriptional profile
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28415971 PMCID: PMC5392922 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-017-3689-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
The number of C. elegans differentially expressed genes (DEGs) upon different pathogen infection
| Orsay virus [N2] | Orsay virus [ |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| DEGs UP | 129 | 277 | 185 |
| DEGs DOWN | 1 | 21 | 11 |
| DEGs Shared with Orsay virus [N2] | N/A | 108 | 108 |
| DEGs shared with Orsay virus [ | 108 | N/A | 139 |
Differentially expressed genes were analyzed using edgeR with 3 replicates and a FDR < 0.05 cutoff. N/A: Not applicable
Fig. 1C. elegans differentially expressed genes upon different pathogen infections. a Venn diagram showed the number of genes as differentially expressed after 12 h infection for the three different conditions (Orsay virus [N2], Orsay virus [rde-1], and N. parisii [N2]) and their relationships. b Bar graph showed the number of genes as up-regulated or down-regulated upon different infections
Gene Ontology (GO), InterPRO term enriched from C. elegans genes differentially expressed upon Orsay virus or N. parisii infection
| Condition | Go term, InterPRO classification | Human ortholog | Functional annotations | Gene count | FDR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Orsay virus [N2] |
| Yes | N/A | 24 | 6.9E-32 |
|
| No | F-box associated | 13 | 6.6E-09 | |
|
| No | N/A | 5 | 1.4E-06 | |
|
| Yes | MATH | 8 | 1.3E-06 | |
| Orsay virus [ |
| Yes | N/A | 25 | 2.3E-25 |
| GO:0045087:Innate immune response | N/A | Innate immunity | 23 | 6.2E-13 | |
|
| Yes | MATH | 14 | 3.1E-09 | |
|
| No | N/A | 7 | 2.9E-08 | |
|
| No | F-box associated | 16 | 3.8E-06 | |
| IPR003366:CUB-like domain | No | N/A | 9 | 4.7E-06 | |
| IPR000859:CUB domain | Yes | CUB | 8 | 6.1E-04 | |
| IPR002867:Zinc finger, C6HC-type | Yes | Ubiquitin related | 4 | 2.1E-02 | |
|
|
| Yes | N/A | 25 | 1.4E-29 |
|
| No | N/A | 9 | 1.7E-14 | |
|
| Yes | MATH | 11 | 3.0E-08 | |
|
| No | F-box associated | 13 | 2.5E-06 | |
| GO:0045087:Innate immune response | N/A | Innate immunity | 8 | 5.2E-03 | |
| IPR001841:Zinc finger, RING-type | Yes | Zinc finger | 8 | 5.9E-03 | |
| IPR016186:C-type lectin-like | Yes | C-type lectin-like | 9 | 1.0E-02 | |
| GO:0005764:lysosome | N/A | lysosome | 4 | 2.9E-02 |
GO term, InterPRO classification enrichment was analyzed using online DAVID Bioinformatics Resources 6.8. Bold denotes conserved terms across the three infection conditions: Orsay virus [N2], Orsay virus [rde-1], and N. parisii [N2]. N/A: Not applicable
Fig. 2Heatmap of transcription profiles of selected gene families with multiple induced family members. The heatmap showed the log2 counts per million (CPM) for each gene in either C17H1 gene family or DUF713 gene family. Each experimental condition had three replicates and each replicate was represented in a column
Fig. 3Evolutionarily conserved pan-microbial responsive C. elegans genes. C. elegans genes differentially expressed following Orsay and N. parisii infection that have orthologs in C. briggsae were differentially expressed. Red shading indicates C. elegans genes whose orthologs in C. briggsae have conserved response to Santeuil infection of C. briggsae
Conserved responses between bacterial or fungal pathogen to Orsay virus DEGs
| Total DEGs | Bacterial/fungal DEGs shared with Orsay DEGs | Overlap significance | Number of DEGs from | Number of | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 246 | 5 | 4.4E-01 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 3787 | 84 | 6.1E-04 | 15 | 11 |
|
| 3819 | 40 |
| 2 | 2 |
|
| 3695 | 60 | 7.1E-01 | 6 | 4 |
|
| 146 | 10 | 1.0E-04 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 3797 | 111 | 6.4E-12 | 12 | 11 |
|
| 386 | 9 | 2.1E-01 | 1 | 1 |
|
| 3384 | 56 | 6.5E-01 | 11 | 7 |
Pathogen infection expression profile analysis data were obtained from [7, 8, 11, 36]. The DEGs from each pathogen were compared to Orsay virus DEGs. Association significance is calculated using Fisher exact test. Bold indicates a significant negative correlation