| Literature DB >> 28415730 |
Maria Adelaide Marini1, Gaia Chiara Mannino2, Teresa Vanessa Fiorentino2, Francesco Andreozzi2, Francesco Perticone2, Giorgio Sesti2.
Abstract
In vitro and in vivo studies suggest that IGF-1 has a role in erythropoiesis. There is evidence that the rs35767 C/T polymorphism near IGF1 is associated with plasma IGF-1 levels. We investigated the effect of this polymorphism on hemoglobin (Hb) concentration and anemia. The study group comprised 3286 adult Whites. The rs35767 polymorphism was screened using a TaqMan allelic discrimination assay. The rs35767 polymorphism was not associated with age, gender, BMI, waist circumference, smoking, blood pressure, plasma glucose, HbA1c, type 2 diabetes, HOMA-IR, hsCRP, eGFR, and lipid profile. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), fibrinogen, and fasting insulin levels were significantly lower in TT genotype carriers compared with C allele carriers. Hb concentration was significantly higher in carriers of the TT genotype compared with C allele carriers, and a lower proportion of TT carriers had anemia. As compared with TT genotype carriers, those bearing the CC genotype had a 2.4-fold higher risk of anemia (OR 2.40, 95%CI 1.19-4.82), and those with the CT genotype had a 2.0-fold higher risk of anemia (OR 2.06, 95%CI 1.04-4.11). The association remained significant when fasting insulin, eGFR, smoking, diabetes, ACE inhibitors, sartans or diuretics treatments, use of metformin and pioglitazone were added to the model, but its independence was not retained after inclusion of fibrinogen and ESR values into the model. In conclusion, rs35767 TT allele carriers exhibited significantly higher concentrations of Hb, and lower risk of anemia compared with C allele carriers supporting the idea that IGF-1 plays a role in erythropoiesis homeostasis.Entities:
Keywords: Pathology Section; anemia; hemoglobin; insulin-like growth factor 1; rs35767; single nucleotide polymorphism
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28415730 PMCID: PMC5464797 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.16132
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Clinical characteristics of 3286 study subjects according to the SNP rs35767 near IGF1
| Variables | CC | CT | TT | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male/Female | 1088/1026 | 513/510 | 78/71 | 0.74 | 0.75 |
| Age (yrs.) | 52±13 | 52±14 | 54±10 | 0.22 | 0.22 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 30.0±6.1 | 29.9±6.2 | 29.9±5.3 | 0.86 | 0.82 |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 101±14 | 101±15 | 102±14 | 0.77 | 0.17 |
| Current smokers (%) | 20.3 | 20.3 | 15.3 | 0.20 | 0.07 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 134±18 | 134±18 | 134±18 | 0.94 | 0.74 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 81±11 | 81±11 | 81±10 | 0.85 | 0.80 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dl) | 200±41 | 195±42 | 202±35 | 0.004 | 0.27 |
| HDL (mg/dl) | 50±14 | 50±14 | 50±14 | 0.76 | 0.90 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dl) | 136±78 | 134±94 | 137±83 | 0.39 | 0.68 |
| HbA1c (%) [mmol/mol] | 6.1±1.3 [43] | 6.1±1.4 [43] | 6.2±1.3 [44] | 0.76 | 0.55 |
| Fasting glucose (mg/dl) | 100±45 | 110±44 | 111±38 | 0.95 | 0.77 |
| Fasting insulin (μU/ml) | 14±10 | 14±9 | 12±6 | 0.16 | 0.05 |
| HOMA-IR | 3.9±4.1 | 3.8±3.5 | 3.4±2.3 | 0.36 | 0.15 |
| hsCRP (mg/l) | 2.9±1.8 | 2.8±2.2 | 2.7±1.9 | 0.24 | 0.30 |
| Fibrinogen (mg/dl) | 326±83 | 328±87 | 310±72 | 0.07 | 0.02 |
| Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (mm/h) | 11±9 | 11±9 | 8±6 | 0.08 | 0.02 |
| eGFR (ml/min/1.73m2) | 117±38 | 118±40 | 115±32 | 0.55 | 0.38 |
| ACE inhibitor therapy, No.(%) | 559 (32.4) | 278 (33.5) | 49 (38.9) | 0.31 | 0.15 |
| Angiotensin receptor blocker therapy, No.(%) | 389 (18.4) | 193 (18.9) | 23 (15.4) | 0.60 | 0.36 |
| Diuretics, No.(%) | 500 (23.7) | 238 (23.3) | 33 (22.1) | 0.89 | 0.69 |
| Patients with type 2 diabetes, No.(%) | 547 (25.9) | 277 (27.1) | 46 (30.9) | 0.35 | 0.21 |
| Patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin and/or pioglitazone, No.(%) | 186 (8.8) | 110 (10.7) | 14 (9.3) | 0.21 | 0.88 |
Data are as means ± SD. Triglycerides, hsCRP, ESR, fasting insulin concentrations, and HOMA-IR were log transformed for statistical analysis, but values in the table represent a back transformation to the original scale. Categorical variables were compared by χ2 test. Unpaired Student’s t test or ANOVA were used to compare differences of continuous variables between the genotypes, as appropriate. BMI: body mass index; HDL: high density lipoprotein; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; hsCRP: high sensitivity C reactive protein; HOMA-IR: homeostasis model assessment index of insulin resistance.
Haematological characteristics of 3286 study subjects according to the SNP rs35767 near IGF1
| Variables | CC | CT | TT | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hemoglobin (g/dl) | 13.9±1.5 | 13.8±4.5 | 14.2±1.3 | 0.02 | 0.03 |
| Hematocrit (%) | 41±4.5 | 41±4.5 | 42±4.0 | 0.24 | 0.30 |
| Mean corpuscular volume (fl) | 85±9 | 85±8 | 85±5 | 0.81 | 0.88 |
| Mean corpuscular hemoglobin (pg) | 28.5±3.2 | 29.9±6.2 | 29.9±5.3 | 0.28 | 0.24 |
| Serum Iron (μg/dl) | 84±34 | 80±28 | 86±29 | 0.32 | 0.66 |
| Subjects with anemia, No. (%) | 244 (62.9%) | 135 (35.0%) | 9 (2.3%) | 0.03 | 0.02 |
Data are means ± SD. Categorical variables were compared by χ2 test. Comparisons between the groups were performed using a general linear model. P values refer to results after analyses with adjustment for age, and gender.
Odds ratios (95% CI) by multiple logistic regression models for anemia in relation to the SNP rs35767 near IGF1
| Anemia | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Study groups | OR | 95%CI | |
| Model 1 | |||
| TT genotype (reference category) | 1 | --- | --- |
| CC genotype | 2.40 | 1.19–4.82 | 0.01 |
| CT genotype | 2.06 | 1.04–4.11 | 0.03 |
| Model 2 | |||
| TT genotype (reference category) | 1 | --- | --- |
| CC genotype | 2.86 | 1.22–6.68 | 0.01 |
| CT genotype | 2.33 | 1.02–5.39 | 0.04 |
| Model 3 | |||
| TT genotype (reference category) | 1 | --- | --- |
| CC genotype | 2.91 | 1.24–6.83 | 0.01 |
| CT genotype | 2.40 | 1.03–5.55 | 0.04 |
| Model 4 | |||
| TT genotype (reference category) | 1 | --- | --- |
| CC genotype | 3.21 | 0.98–10.60 | 0.055 |
| CT genotype | 2.48 | 0.77–8.11 | 0.13 |
Model 1: adjusted for age, and gender. Model 2: Model 1 + fasting insulin levels. Model 3: Model 2 + eGFR, smoking status, diagnosis of diabetes, treatment with ACE inhibitors, ARBs or diuretics, use of metformin and pioglitazone in diabetic patients. Model 4: Model 3 + fibrinogen and ESR.