Literature DB >> 28414904

In Silico Prediction of Chemicals Binding to Aromatase with Machine Learning Methods.

Hanwen Du1, Yingchun Cai1, Hongbin Yang1, Hongxiao Zhang1, Yuhan Xue1, Guixia Liu1, Yun Tang1, Weihua Li1.   

Abstract

Environmental chemicals may affect endocrine systems through multiple mechanisms, one of which is via effects on aromatase (also known as CYP19A1), an enzyme critical for maintaining the normal balance of estrogens and androgens in the body. Therefore, rapid and efficient identification of aromatase-related endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) is important for toxicology and environment risk assessment. In this study, on the basis of the Tox21 10K compound library, in silico classification models for predicting aromatase binders/nonbinders were constructed by machine learning methods. To improve the prediction ability of the models, a combined classifier (CC) strategy that combines different independent machine learning methods was adopted. Performances of the models were measured by test and external validation sets containing 1336 and 216 chemicals, respectively. The best model was obtained with the MACCS (Molecular Access System) fingerprint and CC method, which exhibited an accuracy of 0.84 for the test set and 0.91 for the external validation set. Additionally, several representative substructures for characterizing aromatase binders, such as ketone, lactone, and nitrogen-containing derivatives, were identified using information gain and substructure frequency analysis. Our study provided a systematic assessment of chemicals binding to aromatase. The built models can be helpful to rapidly identify potential EDCs targeting aromatase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28414904     DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.7b00037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol        ISSN: 0893-228X            Impact factor:   3.739


  4 in total

1.  Comparing Machine Learning Models for Aromatase (P450 19A1).

Authors:  Kimberley M Zorn; Daniel H Foil; Thomas R Lane; Wendy Hillwalker; David J Feifarek; Frank Jones; William D Klaren; Ashley M Brinkman; Sean Ekins
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 2.  In Silico Prediction of Chemical Toxicity for Drug Design Using Machine Learning Methods and Structural Alerts.

Authors:  Hongbin Yang; Lixia Sun; Weihua Li; Guixia Liu; Yun Tang
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 5.221

3.  In Silico Prediction of O⁶-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase Inhibitory Potency of Base Analogs with QSAR and Machine Learning Methods.

Authors:  Guohui Sun; Tengjiao Fan; Xiaodong Sun; Yuxing Hao; Xin Cui; Lijiao Zhao; Ting Ren; Yue Zhou; Rugang Zhong; Yongzhen Peng
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 4.411

4.  QSAR and Classification Study on Prediction of Acute Oral Toxicity of N-Nitroso Compounds.

Authors:  Tengjiao Fan; Guohui Sun; Lijiao Zhao; Xin Cui; Rugang Zhong
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 5.923

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.