Caroline Oi-Ling Yu1, Kwok-Sui Leung1, Kwok-Pui Fung2, Francis Fu-Yuen Lam2, Ethel Sau-Kuen Ng2, Kit-Man Lau3,4, Simon Kwoon-Ho Chow1,5, Wing-Hoi Cheung1,5. 1. Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 30-32 Ngan Shing Street, Shatin, Hong Kong, P.R. China. 2. School of Biomedical Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, P.R. China. 3. Institute of Chinese Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, P.R. China. 4. State Key Laboratory of Phytochemistry and Plant Resources in West China, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, P.R. China. 5. The CUHK-ACC Space Medicine Centre on Health Maintenance of Musculoskeletal System, The Chinese University of Hong Kong Shenzhen Research Institute, 10 Yue Xin Er Dao, Shenzhen, P.R. China.
Abstract
Delayed foot wound healing is a major complication attributed to hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) patients, and these wounds may develop into foot ulcers. There are at least two types of DM wound models used in rodents to study delayed wound healing. However, clinically relevant animal models are not common. Most models use type 1 DM rodents or wounds created on the back rather than on the foot. An open full-thickness excision wound on the footpad of type 2 DM rats is more clinically relevant, but such a model has not yet been characterized systematically. The objective of this study was to investigate and characterize how DM affected a full-thickness excision open foot wound in n5-streptozotocin (n5-STZ)-induced type 2 DM rats. We hypothesized that elevated inflammation, reduced blood circulation, and cell proliferation due to hyperglycemia could delay the wound healing of DM rats. The wounds of DM rats were compared with those of non-DM rats (Ctrl) at Days 1 and 8 post wounding. The wound healing process of the DM rats was significantly delayed compared with that of the Ctrl rats. The DM rats also had higher C-reactive protein (CRP) and lower blood circulation and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) in DM wounds. This confirmed that elevated inflammation and reduced blood flow and cell proliferation delayed foot wound healing in the n5-STZ rats. Hence, this open foot wound animal model provides a good approach to study the process of delayed wound healing.
Delayed foot wound healing is a major complication attributed to hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) patients, and these wounds may develop into foot ulcers. There are at least two types of DM wound models used in rodents to study delayed wound healing. However, clinically relevant animal models are not common. Most models use type 1 DM rodents or wounds created on the back rather than on the foot. An open full-thickness excision wound on the footpad of type 2 DMrats is more clinically relevant, but such a model has not yet been characterized systematically. The objective of this study was to investigate and characterize how DM affected a full-thickness excision open foot wound in n5-streptozotocin (n5-STZ)-induced type 2 DMrats. We hypothesized that elevated inflammation, reduced blood circulation, and cell proliferation due to hyperglycemia could delay the wound healing of DMrats. The wounds of DMrats were compared with those of non-DMrats (Ctrl) at Days 1 and 8 post wounding. The wound healing process of the DMrats was significantly delayed compared with that of the Ctrlrats. The DMrats also had higher C-reactive protein (CRP) and lower blood circulation and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) in DM wounds. This confirmed that elevated inflammation and reduced blood flow and cell proliferation delayed foot wound healing in the n5-STZrats. Hence, this open foot wound animal model provides a good approach to study the process of delayed wound healing.
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) is a major medical problem and constitutes 90–95% of all
diabetes in the population worldwide [18]. Delayed
wound healing is one of complications of type 2 DM due to multiple factors such as poor
blood circulation [4], prolonged inflammation, and
hyperglycemia. It is a common cause of morbidity and mortality among DMpatients [24]. Once a wound becomes chronic, it is prone to
development of foot ulcers, including neuropathy, and foot deformities [4]. DM foot ulcers cause over 50% of all nontraumatic
lower-leg amputations [44]. Evidence has shown that
hyperglycemia is one of the major factors contributing to delayed wound healing [24] by increasing cell apoptosis and reducing cell
survival in diabetic wounds. It has been shown to inhibit proliferation of endothelial cells
and fibroblasts in humans [47], with up to 75% slower
in an adult DMmouse compared with a control mouse [26].Normal wound healing requires a well-orchestrated integration of the following overlapping
events: hemostasis, appropriate inflammation, mesenchymal cell differentiation,
proliferation, and migration to the wound site, angiogenesis, reepithelialization,
granulation tissue formation, wound contraction, and tissue remodeling [4, 17]. The complex
process requires proper circulation [1, 27] and involves the interaction and migration of various
types of cells such as inflammatory cells, fibroblasts, keratinocytes, and endothelial cells
with growth factors and enzymes [4, 23]. However, excessive or uncontrolled inflammation can
promote tissue injury as observed in patients with type 2 DM [49], where DM disrupts each phase of healing progress by affecting
various types of cells and molecular effectors [29].
DM wounds frequently enter a state of pathologic inflammation due to a postponed,
incomplete, or uncoordinated healing process [17]. At
the macroscopic level, delayed wound healing is associated with poor blood circulations
[4]. Hence, this complex healing process requires a
good animal model for research to understand its mechanism and explore new therapies.Excision [34] and incision [31] wounds are two major types of wound models used for DM wound healing
studies. An excision wound model is more suitable to study of open wound healing because it
produces more wound and scar tissue for analysis [40]
and does not require stitches after surgery [31]. In
past DM foot ulcer/wound studies, type 1 DM was induced in most rodents, such as rats and
mice [43, 52,
54]. Furthermore, wounds were usually created on
the back of the rat/mouse [3, 6, 15, 53]. There are a few papers in which wounds were created on the plantar
skin of the paw [20] or at the foot dorsal [43], but none of these wound models used type 2 DMrats.
Since 90% of DMpatients worldwide have type 2 DM [41] and approximately 5–7% of type 2 patients will eventually have a foot ulcer
[28], it is important to have a clinically relevant
animal model for research, and it should be an open wound model on the foot in type 2 DMrats. There is a relevant animal model that induces an open full-thickness excision wound on
the dorsal side of the footpad using type 2 DMrats [25]; however, the model has only been used to address the effect of oral
medication without a systematic characterization of the model. The objective of this study
was to investigate and characterize how DM affects an open full-thickness excision foot
wound in n5-streptozotocin (n5-STZ)-induced type 2 DMrats. We hypothesized that elevated
inflammation, reduced blood circulation, and reduced cell proliferation due to hyperglycemia
could delay healing of the foot wound in n5-STZ-induced DMrats.
Materials and Methods
Animal
A total of 60 female albino Wistar rats were used in this study, and they were equally
divided into DM and non-DM (Ctrl) groups (30 rats/group). In the DM group, 5-day old
Wistar rats were intraperitoneally injected with streptozotocin (STZ, Sigma-Aldrich, 70
mg/kg) that was freshly dissolved in 0.1 M citrate buffer (pH 4.5). The Ctrl group was
injected with citrate buffer only. All rats were supplied by and kept in the Laboratory
Animal Service Center of the Chinese University of Hong Kong. All rats resided in a room
with a 12-h light-dark cycle and a constant temperature between 22–25°C. All rats were
provided with a sufficient amount of a normal rodent diet ad libitum
(Prolab 2500 rodent diet) and tapwater daily. Body weights were measured weekly from Day
5 until the end point of the study (10–12 weeks old).The animal experiments were conducted under a license issued under the Animals (control
of experiments) Ordinance (Cap. 340) issued by the Department of Health of the Hong Kong
government, and approval was obtained from the Animal Experimentation Ethics Committee
(Ref: 13/085/GRF-5), the Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Foot wounding animal model
Induction of an open foot wound was based on an excisional model [25]. Nine weeks after STZ injection, a glucometer (Contour Plus, Bayer
Healthcare, Germany) was used to determine if each rat’s blood glucose level met the
severe diabetes level of ≥300 mg/dl by drawing blood at the tip of the tail. Adult DMrats
with a blood glucose level greater than 300 mg/dl were used for open wound induction. On
the day of open wound induction (Day 0), each rat was anesthetized with 75 mg/kg ketamine
and 10 mg/kg xylazine by intraperitoneal injection. The surface skin of the right footpad
was shaved and cleaned with an 70% ethanol wipe. A 2 mm × 5 mm rectangular full thickness
wound was created in the skin of the footpad on the right hind leg of each rat using a
scalpel [25]. This model was used to evaluate the
epithelialization, contraction, and inflammation outcomes of the n5-STZ-induced DMrats.
Time point design
The wound area was measured with photo imaging software (SPOT 3.5.5 for Windows) at Day 1
post wounding as the initial wound size area and Day 8 post wounding as the wound at
proliferation/angiogenesis stage. Blood glucose level and blood perfusion were measured at
Day 1, Day 4, Day 8, and Day 13 post wounding with a Contour Plus glucometer (Bayer
Healthcare, Germany) and laser Doppler imaging system (Moor Instruments Ltd., Devon, UK )
[25].
Wound size measurements
Wound size (area) was evaluated by macro photography [25]. Rat wounds and a metric ruler with standardized 1 cm × 1 cm squares were
photographed simultaneously. Digital photographs of the injury site were taken using a
Canon SX50HS digital camera with white lighting. The area of the wound size was calculated
using the photo imaging software (SPOT 3.5.5 for Windows) calibrated to reference squares.
The metric ruler was used for calculating the wound area in the SPOT software.
Blood perfusion by laser doppler measurement
The wounded foot was placed flat on a platform and scanned by the laser Doppler imaging
system (Moor Instruments Ltd., Devon, UK ) using the repeat image measurement mode. The
unwounded foot of each rat was also scanned as a control. Flux data were obtained from the
process and used as the measurement data. All data were quantified and automatically
calculated using the Moor FLPI measurement software (Version 2.1) [22].
ELISA of C-reactive protein (CRP)
Under general anesthesia, 1 ml of blood was extracted from each rat’s heart through
cardiac puncture before euthanasia. The blood sample was then centrifuged at 9,500 rpm for
10 mins. The serum was collected and diluted at 1:600,000. Fifty microliters of each
sample was used to determine the CRP level according to the instructions of a Rat C
Reactive Protein ELISA Kit (PTX1) (ab108827, abcam, Cambridge, UK ).
Histology
The skin tissue from the wound site and its surrounding unwounded area were collected
from all the rats for histological analyses [35].
Samples were obtained after rats were euthanized with an overdose of sodium pentobarbital
at Day 1, Day 4, Day 8, and Day 13 post wounding. Samples were fixed in 4%
paraformaldehyde for 48 h, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned at 8 µm.
The sections were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated before staining with hematoxylin
and eosin (H&E). Section images were captured with a microscope (DM5000, Leica
Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) to evaluate reepithelialization, granulation tissue,
and inflammatory response.
Some histological sections were used for immunohistochemistry [7]. Sections were incubated with an anti-PCNArabbit polyclonal antibody
(ab18197, abcam, Cambridge, UK ) diluted at 1/4,000 in PBS for 2 h, washed in PBS, and
incubated with a Mouse and Rabbit Specific HRP/DAB Detection IHC kit (abcam, Cambridge, UK
). Sections were counterstained with hematoxylin and then dehydrated with ethanol. Control
specimens were also stained, but PBS was substituted for the primary antibody. All section
images were captured with a microscope.
Statistical analysis
All data were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Two-way analysis of variance
(ANOVA) was used to analyze the main effects between the two groups (Ctrl and DM), and
time point differences were analyzed with post hoc Bonferroni tests. All tests were
two-tailed. Student’s t-test for two independent samples was used for
comparisons between the Ctrl and DM groups. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM
SPSS Statistics 20.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA), and statistical significance was considered
at P<0.05.
Sample size estimation
A sample size of 6 in each group is sufficient to detect a difference in treatment effect
using an ANOVA (analysis of variance) test with 80% power and a 0.05 two-sided
significance level (PASS 11.0, NCSS, LLC, Kaysville, UT, USA).
Results
Rat physical health
The weights of DMrats were significantly lower than those of the rats in the Ctrl group
beginning in week 3 after birth (Fig. 1). The mortality rate was approximately 45%. DMrats also increased their food and
water uptakes beginning at week 5 after birth. The glucose levels of the DMrats were
significantly higher than those of the Ctrlrats from week 2 to week 12
(P<0.05 for all). The average blood glucose level of DMrats was 498
mg/dl (Table 1).
Fig. 1.
Weight comparison between the DM and Ctrl groups (n=20/ group). Weight differences
between DM and Ctrl rats from weeks 1 to 12. Week 4 was excluded because it was the
end of the weaning period and the rats were adjusting to a new diet. Other than in
week 1, the weights of the DM rats were significantly lower than those of the Ctrl
rats. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. ** Significant difference.
Table 1.
Comparision of the average blood glucose levels between DM and Ctrl rats at
Days 1, 4, 8, and 13 post wounding
Day 1
Day 4
Day 8
Day 13
Ctrl
109.00 ± 25.70 mg/dl
119.47 ± 28.76 mg/dl
115.65 ± 31.90 mg/dl
95.65 ± 20.45 mg/dl
DM
476.33 ± 93.11 mg/dl
476.95 ± 75.95 mg/dl
550.76 ± 64.93 mg/dl
491.26 ± 82.96 mg/dl
Significant differences (P<0.001 for all) were observed at all
time points between DM and Ctrl rats.
Weight comparison between the DM and Ctrl groups (n=20/ group). Weight differences
between DM and Ctrlrats from weeks 1 to 12. Week 4 was excluded because it was the
end of the weaning period and the rats were adjusting to a new diet. Other than in
week 1, the weights of the DMrats were significantly lower than those of the Ctrlrats. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. ** Significant difference.Significant differences (P<0.001 for all) were observed at all
time points between DM and Ctrlrats.
Wound morphology
Wounds created by scalpel and scissors (Day 0) were consistent in size and shape with
minimal to no bleeding in both groups. All open wound inductions were conducted by the
same researcher. At 24 h post wounding, the wound size was increased in both groups, as
the edges of the wounds were stretched farther apart due to edema and swelling expanded to
the whole foot (Fig. 2A). Swelling at the foot wound continued in DMrats at Day 13, but it subsided in
Ctrlrats as early as Day 4 post wounding. At Day 8 post wounding, the area of the wound
in the DMrats (9.29 ± 0.88 mm2) was significantly larger
(P=0.048) than that in the Ctrlrats (7.91 ± 1.80 mm2) at Day
8 (Fig. 2B).
Fig. 2.
Images of the foot wounds at Days 1, 4, 8, and 13 post wounding and comparison of
wound size (area) between the DM and Ctrl groups (n=6/time point). A) At Day 1, the
foot wounds of both the DM (a) and Ctrl (e) rats expanded from their original wound
sizes within 24 h after open wound induction. At Day 4, the foot wound of the DM
rats (f) remained swollen, and the hypodermis layer can still be observed from the
outside. The foot wound edges of the Ctrl rats (b) were no longer stretched apart
due to edema. Secondary wound healing was observed in the wound of the Ctrl rats,
with the wound edges pulling into the center of the wound, forming an eclipse, and a
scab was observed on the surface of the wound. At Day 8, the wound size of the Ctrl
rats (c) had shrunken into half of its original size (a). Swelling can still be
observed at the wound edges of the DM rats (g), and the hypodermis layer can still
be seen from the outside. At Day 13, the wound of the Ctrl rats (d) was fully
closed, while that of the DM rats remained open. B) The area of the wounds are shown
for the DM and Ctrl rats at Days 1 and 8 post wounding. The area of the wound in the
DM rats was significantly bigger than that in the Ctrl rats at Day 8 post wounding
(P=0.048). ** Significant difference.
Images of the foot wounds at Days 1, 4, 8, and 13 post wounding and comparison of
wound size (area) between the DM and Ctrl groups (n=6/time point). A) At Day 1, the
foot wounds of both the DM (a) and Ctrl (e) rats expanded from their original wound
sizes within 24 h after open wound induction. At Day 4, the foot wound of the DMrats (f) remained swollen, and the hypodermis layer can still be observed from the
outside. The foot wound edges of the Ctrlrats (b) were no longer stretched apart
due to edema. Secondary wound healing was observed in the wound of the Ctrlrats,
with the wound edges pulling into the center of the wound, forming an eclipse, and a
scab was observed on the surface of the wound. At Day 8, the wound size of the Ctrlrats (c) had shrunken into half of its original size (a). Swelling can still be
observed at the wound edges of the DMrats (g), and the hypodermis layer can still
be seen from the outside. At Day 13, the wound of the Ctrlrats (d) was fully
closed, while that of the DMrats remained open. B) The area of the wounds are shown
for the DM and Ctrlrats at Days 1 and 8 post wounding. The area of the wound in the
DMrats was significantly bigger than that in the Ctrlrats at Day 8 post wounding
(P=0.048). ** Significant difference.Laser Doppler imaging system was used to scan the surface of the wounded foot to evaluate
the blood flow around the wound in terms of flux (n=6/ time point) (Fig. 3A), where flux was expressed in terms of arbitrary perfusion units rather than
absolute values for the blood flow speed. The flux values of DMrats (Day 1, 167.91 ±
89.32; Day 4, 252.83 ± 100.24; Day 13, 49.89 ± 16.46) were significantly lower than those
of Ctrlrats (Day 1, 287.48 ± 174.73; Day 4, 341.79 ± 142.207; Day 13, 163.63 ± 79.83)
(P=0.002, 0.017, and 0.000, respectively). The data indicated that the
blood flow around and in the wound of the DMrats was significantly lower than that in
Ctrlrats (Fig. 3B).
Fig. 3.
Laser Doppler images of blood flow at the foot wounds and comparison of laser
Doppler imaging measurements (Flux) of DM and Ctrl rats at Days 1, 4, 8, and 13 post
wounding (n=6/ time point). A) The images indicated that Ctrl rats (a, b, c, and d)
had more blood circulation than DM rats (e, f, g, and h) from Day 1 to Day 13 post
wounding. B) DM rats had significantly lower flux values than Ctrl rats at Days 1,
4, and 13 post wounding (P=0.002, 0.017, and 0.000, respectively).
Blood perfusion showed differences of up to 41.59%, 26.02%, and 69.51% between Ctrl
and DM rats on Days 1, 4, and 13 post wounding, respectively. ** Significant
difference.
Laser Doppler images of blood flow at the foot wounds and comparison of laser
Doppler imaging measurements (Flux) of DM and Ctrlrats at Days 1, 4, 8, and 13 post
wounding (n=6/ time point). A) The images indicated that Ctrlrats (a, b, c, and d)
had more blood circulation than DMrats (e, f, g, and h) from Day 1 to Day 13 post
wounding. B) DMrats had significantly lower flux values than Ctrlrats at Days 1,
4, and 13 post wounding (P=0.002, 0.017, and 0.000, respectively).
Blood perfusion showed differences of up to 41.59%, 26.02%, and 69.51% between Ctrl
and DMrats on Days 1, 4, and 13 post wounding, respectively. ** Significant
difference.
ELISA and CRP
CRP was used as a marker to compare the inflammation markers between DM and Ctrlrats
post wounding (n=6/ time point) (Fig. 4). The CRP levels of DMrats (Day 4, 52.92 ± 7.62 ng/ml; Day 8, 53.03 ± 2.66 ng/ml;
Day 13, 57.00 ± 5.13 ng/ml) were significantly higher than those of Ctrlrats (Day 4,
39.60 ± 5.83 ng/ml; Day 8, 38.28 ± 2.01 ng/ml; Day 13, 37.46 ± 4.88 ng/ml)
(P=0.007, 0.000, and 0.000, respectively).
Fig. 4.
Comparison of C-reactive protein (CRP) levels between the DM and Ctrl groups (n=6/
time point). The concentrations of CRP of the DM rats increased with time, while
those of Ctrl rats declined. Significant differences were observed at Day 4, Day 8,
and Day 13 post wounding, with the CRP concentrations of the DM rats being
significantly higher than those of the Ctrl group (P=0.007, 0.000,
and 0.000, respectively). The CRP level showed differences of up to 25.17%, 27.81%,
and 34.28% between Ctrl and DM rats at Days 4, 8, and 13 post wounding,
respectively. ** Significant difference.
Comparison of C-reactive protein (CRP) levels between the DM and Ctrl groups (n=6/
time point). The concentrations of CRP of the DMrats increased with time, while
those of Ctrlrats declined. Significant differences were observed at Day 4, Day 8,
and Day 13 post wounding, with the CRP concentrations of the DMrats being
significantly higher than those of the Ctrl group (P=0.007, 0.000,
and 0.000, respectively). The CRP level showed differences of up to 25.17%, 27.81%,
and 34.28% between Ctrl and DMrats at Days 4, 8, and 13 post wounding,
respectively. ** Significant difference.At Day 1 post wounding, a new epithelium was observed on the surface of the wounds in
both groups (n=6/ time point) (Fig. 5A). At Day 4 post wounding, the epithelial layer of DMrats was not uniformly formed
on the surface of the wound, and inflammation was observed in both groups. At Day 8 post
wounding, inflammation persisted with accumulation of neutrophils between layers and in
the epidermis in the foot wound of the DMrats, while this had subsided in the Ctrlrats,
and granulation tissue moved down to the base of the wound. At Day 13 post wounding,
inflammation in the foot wound of the DMrats finally subsided, but capillaries were not
observed. On the other hand, the foot wound of the Ctrlrats was almost completely healed
or was completely healed at Day 13 post wounding with capillaries observed at the base of
the wound.
Fig. 5.
Representative histology images of DM rats and Ctrl rats (n=6/ time point). A)
H&E staining showed that inflammation persisted with accumulation of neutrophils
in the foot wounds of DM rats until Day 13 post wounding (c and e), while
inflammation in Ctrl rats subsided after Day 4 post wounding. Compared with Ctrl
rats, no capillaries were observed in the wounds of DM rats at Days 8 and 13 post
wounding. Note: Arrows indicate the locations of neutrophils. B) Representative
histology images of DM rats (image e in Fig.
5A) and Ctrl rats (image d in Fig.
5A) at 40× magnification. H&E staining at 40× showed that accumulation
of neutrophils (arrows) at Day 4 in the DM rats showing neutrophil that persisted up
to Day 8 post wounding (images k and l); in contrast to the Ctrl rats (images i and
j) that shows earlier progression to the proliferative phase with less neutrophil
accumulation. **Arrows indicate the locations of neutrophils.
Representative histology images of DMrats and Ctrlrats (n=6/ time point). A)
H&E staining showed that inflammation persisted with accumulation of neutrophils
in the foot wounds of DMrats until Day 13 post wounding (c and e), while
inflammation in Ctrlrats subsided after Day 4 post wounding. Compared with Ctrlrats, no capillaries were observed in the wounds of DMrats at Days 8 and 13 post
wounding. Note: Arrows indicate the locations of neutrophils. B) Representative
histology images of DMrats (image e in Fig.
5A) and Ctrlrats (image d in Fig.
5A) at 40× magnification. H&E staining at 40× showed that accumulation
of neutrophils (arrows) at Day 4 in the DMrats showing neutrophil that persisted up
to Day 8 post wounding (images k and l); in contrast to the Ctrlrats (images i and
j) that shows earlier progression to the proliferative phase with less neutrophil
accumulation. **Arrows indicate the locations of neutrophils.At Day 4 post wounding, the epithelial layer of Ctrlrats was more completed than that
observed in the DMrats. A crust/scab was observed on the wound surface of the Ctrlrats.
At Day 8 post wounding, scar tissue was more visible in Ctrlrats than in DMrats, and the
granulation tissue moved down to the base of the wound. Inflammation was still observed in
DMrats at Day 8 post wounding, while inflammation had subsided in Ctrlrats, and a dry
scab was observed on the surface of the wound (Fig.
5B).
Immunohistochemistry (PCNA)
Immunohistochemistry of PCNA was performed to evaluate cell proliferation during the
inflammation and proliferation phases of the wound healing process (n=6/ time point). The
PCNA expression levels of Ctrlrats (Day 4, 16.74 ± 3.57%; Day 13, 12.64 ± 4.92%) were
significantly higher than those observed in DMrats (Day 4, 7.87 ± 3.57%; Day 13, 4.24 ±
3.50%) (P=0.003 and 0.009, respectively) (Fig. 6).
Fig. 6.
Comparison of PCNA immunohistochemistry between the DM and Ctrl groups (n=6/ time
point). A) The PCNA expression of the Ctrl group was generally higher than that of
the DM group, with significant differences at Day 4 and Day 13
(P=0.003 and 0.009, respectively). PCNA expression showed
differences of up to 52.98% and 66.45% between Ctrl and DM rats at Days 4 and 13
post wounding, respectively. **Significant difference. B) Representative images of
PCNA immunohistochemistry stains at 20× for the Ctrl (a and c) and DM (b and d) rats
at Day 4 and Day 13. Note: Arrows indicate PCNA expression.
Comparison of PCNA immunohistochemistry between the DM and Ctrl groups (n=6/ time
point). A) The PCNA expression of the Ctrl group was generally higher than that of
the DM group, with significant differences at Day 4 and Day 13
(P=0.003 and 0.009, respectively). PCNA expression showed
differences of up to 52.98% and 66.45% between Ctrl and DMrats at Days 4 and 13
post wounding, respectively. **Significant difference. B) Representative images of
PCNA immunohistochemistry stains at 20× for the Ctrl (a and c) and DM (b and d) rats
at Day 4 and Day 13. Note: Arrows indicate PCNA expression.
Discussion
This study aimed to characterize the wound healing process of a full-thickness excision
open foot wound in an n5-streptozotocin (n5-STZ)-induced type 2 DMrat model. Our results
revealed that the foot wounds of DMrats had lower blood circulation, lower PCNA expression
levels, and prolonged inflammation than those of Ctrlrats. The systemic marker CRP was also
significantly elevated in the blood of DMrats than those of Ctrlrats. These pieces of
evidence suggested that hyperglycemia delayed wound healing through significantly reduced
blood circulation, elevated inflammation and CRP, and reduced cell proliferation in
wounds.The neonatal n5-STZ-induced DMrats used in this study showed significant weight loss and
high glucose levels beginning at 5 weeks old. The blood glucose levels of all DMrats were
higher than 300 mg/dl as recommended in past literatures, which classified the rats as
having severe hyperglycemia [50]. Similar to the
findings observed in Takada’s group in their type 2 DMn5-STZ-induced rat model, the DMrats
lost a significant amount of weights as early as week 7 with increased food and water
intakes, polyphagia, polydipsia, polyuria, and hyperglycemia [46].The foot wounds of the DMrats healed significantly slower than those of the Ctrlrats,
with a significant difference at Day 8 post wounding. The delayed foot wound healing in the
DMrats might be due to significantly lower blood circulation in wounds. This was supported
by our results indicating that the foot wounds of the DMrats had significantly lower flux
values than those in the Ctrlrats at Days 1, 4, and 13 post wounding, as laser Doppler
imaging gives a direct measure of the microcirculatory flow in terms of flux beneath the
skin surface [33]. Furthermore, the laser Doppler
imaging results showed that inflammation in the foot wounds of DMrats persisted at Day 13
post wounding, while the inflammation had subsided significantly in the Ctrlrats at that
time point. Altered blood flow and a dysfunctional inflammatory state might be associated
with abnormal chemokine expression in DM wounds, as reported by Galiano et
al. with their 6 mm circular full-thickness wound in the dorsal skin of the back
in type 2 DM db/db mice [13]. The
lower flux values in the foot wounds of the DMrats in our study may be due to the minimal
to no capillaries observed in the H&E sections at Days 8 and 13 post wounding. According
to Ferguson’s group, narrowing or occlusion of the blood vessels was observed within the
edge of foot ulcers in humans with DM [4]. Thus,
hyperglycemia might have induced microvascular complications [39] by altering angiogenesis and extracellular matrix (ECM) structure
[23] resulting in lower blood flow in the
wounds.The delayed foot wound healing of the DMrats might also be due to significantly elevated
inflammation in the DMrats. Our data demonstrated significantly higher CRP circulating in
the blood of the DMrats than in the blood of the Ctrlrats. This is because CRP is a
systemic marker of inflammation [16] and is
positively associated with hyperglycemia independently [37]. Hyperglycemia might have elevated CRP in the blood of DMrats, to inducing
endothelial dysfunction as in ratDM models [19].
Furthermore, the continuously elevated CRP level during the post wounding process was
equivalent to the existence of chronic inflammation [18] in patients with type 2 DM in clinical settings [12]. Our H&E sections further showed that inflammation persisted with
accumulation of neutrophils between the layers and in the epidermis in the foot wounds of DMrats until Day 13 post wounding, while those of Ctrlrats subsided after Day 4 post
wounding. Excessive neutrophils persisting in the wounds of DMrats can contribute to
delayed wound healing and the development of chronic wounds [51], but further assessments are needed to show the activities of neutrophils
wounds, as we did not examine them in detail in this study. High inflammatory responses were
reported in the foot wounds of DMrats previously, as high leukocytosis and abscesses were
found at the wound gaps of full-thickness wounds on the upper back of mice [5]. Furthermore, the wounds of the DMrats at Day 8 post
wounding in our study showed a lack of orientation resulting in a nonuniform wound
contraction at Day 13 post wounding. According to Darby’s group, cell migrations were
inhibited or retarded in full-thickness excisional skin wounds on the back of type 2 DMmice
with a lack of orientation of fibroblasts compared with control wounds at Day 7 post
wounding [8].Lower blood circulation, elevated inflammation, and elevated CRP level in DMrats might
have reduced/inhibited cell proliferation in the wound, as reflected by reduced PCNA
expression levels. Our findings showed that the PCNA expression levels in the wounds of DMrats were significantly reduced at Days 4 and 13 post wounding, indicating disrupted
epidermal proliferation [5]. Similar to the findings
in Ferguson’s study, increased acute inflammatory cells, absence of cellular growth, and
migration in foot ulcer wounds were found in humans with DM [11]. The severe hyperglycemic nature [45]
of the n5-STZ model [50] might have indirectly
impaired and reduced/inhibited cell proliferations [47] by elevating inflammation markers such as CRP.No significant difference in flux was observed on Day 8 post wounding, which might be due
to collagen accumulation in Ctrlrats at the end of the proliferation stage, at which time
the density of the blood vessels is diminished and granulation tissue gradually matures to
produce a scar [48]. However, the significant
difference observed at Day 13 post wounding might be due to the alternation of blood flow
and angiogenesis through hyperglycemia as observed by Galiano et al. in
type 2 DMmice [13] as their health conditions
exacerbated. The significant difference in PCNA expression at Day 13 post wounding might
also be due to the severe condition of hyperglycemia in the DMrats causing a significant
drop in PCNA expression levels from Day 8 to Day 13, whereas the PCNA expression level of
the Ctrlrats were consistent at Days 8 and 13 post wounding.An open full-thickness excision wound on the foot of an n5-STZ-induced animal is a better
wound model to study DM wound healing because the model itself can mimic severe DM in humans
with a high incidence of developing foot ulcers [25].
It also recognized as a good animal wound model that exhibits high resemblance to clinical
observations and can be reproduced and evaluated for epithelialization, contraction,
inflammation, and angiogenesis [14]. The shape of the
excision wound induced in this study has better advantages over other wound models for
studying wound contraction and epithelialization on closure [9]. A circular excision wound (6–8 mm diameter) created by biopsy punch in animals
[32, 42] was
usually used in past literatures, but Montandon et al. observed that
contraction in such wound in animals was slower than in the case of square or
stellate-shaped wound due to its lack of extensibility or to the adherence of the
surrounding skin [30]. Since human wounds tended to
heal by reepithelialization (primary intention) [2]
and contraction (secondary intention) [36], a square
wound is more recommended by Montandon et al. for wound contraction and
epithelialization studies in animals [30]. A
rectangular wound was created in this study, with contraction due to centrifugal pulling of
the skin at the periphery [21, 38] modifying its shape to be similar to a square wound as described by
Montandon et al., making it also preferable for the study of wound
contraction and epithelialization than a circular wound in animals. Finally, a wound on the
foot is more preferred than one on the back in animals where a high hair density might cause
exaggeration of the rate of reepithelialization, especially if the wound is a
partial-thickness wound rather than a typical full-thickness wound [9]. Nevertheless, the wound model used in this study has limitations due
to the differences in tissue architectures and immune responses between humans and rats
[10], but the characterizations and advantages
listed above showed that this model mimics much better wounds in humans with type 2 DM than
other types of open wound animal model. The characteristics of this wound model also matched
with the clinical observations of a DM foot ulcer.In conclusion, an open full-thickness excision foot wound in n5-STZ-induced type 2 DMrats
had lower blood circulation, lower PCNA expression levels, elevated CRP, and prolonged
inflammation compared with that in Ctrlrats. All this confirmed that the foot wound in the
DMrats was characterized by a disorder in the inflammatory and proliferative phases of the
healing process [41] attributed to hyperglycemia.
Therefore, this open foot wound model in n5-STZ-induced rats provides a good approach to
study the process of delayed wound healing under DM conditions.
Authors: Julie Takada; Magaly A Machado; Sidney B Peres; Luciana C Brito; Cristina N Borges-Silva; Cecília E M Costa; Miriam H Fonseca-Alaniz; Sandra Andreotti; Fabio Bessa Lima Journal: Metabolism Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 8.694
Authors: Nagesh S Anavekar; Scott D Solomon; John J V McMurray; Aldo Maggioni; Jean Lucien Rouleau; Robert Califf; Harvey White; Lars Kober; Eric Velazquez; Marc A Pfeffer Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2008-04-01 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Zahra Lotfollahi; Joseph Dawson; Robert Fitridge; Christina Bursill Journal: Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) Date: 2021-01-21 Impact factor: 4.947