Mina Hoseini1, Abbas Bahrampour2, Moghaddameh Mirzaee3. 1. Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran. 2. Modeling in Health Research, Institute for Future Studies in Health, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman,Iran. abahrampour@yahoo.com. 3. Modeling in Health Research, Institute for Future Studies in Health, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman,Iran.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the most common cancer after lung cancer and the second cause of death. In this study we compared Weibull and Lognormal Cure Models with Cox regression on the survival of breast cancer. STUDY DESIGN: A cohort study. METHODS: The current study retrospective cohort study was conducted on 140 patients referred to Ali Ibn Abitaleb Hospital, Rafsanjan southeastern Iran from 2001 to 2015 suffering from breast cancer. We determined and analyzed the effective survival causes by different models using STATA14. RESULTS: According to AIC, log-normal model was more consistent than Weibull. In the multivariable Lognormal model, the effective factors like smoking, second -hand smoking, drinking herbal tea and the last breast-feeding period were included. In addition, using Cox regression factors of significant were the disease grade, size of tumor and its metastasis (p-value<0.05). As Rafsanjan is surrounded by pistachio orchards and pesticides applied by farmers, people of this city are exposed to agricultural pesticides and its harmful consequences. The effect of the pesticide on breast cancer was studied and the results showed that the effect of pesticides on breast cancer was not in agreement with the models used in this study. CONCLUSIONS: Based on different methods for survival analysis, researchers can decide how they can reach a better conclusion. This comparison indicates the result of semi-parametric Cox method is closer to clinical experiences evidences.
BACKGROUND:Breast cancer is the most common cancer after lung cancer and the second cause of death. In this study we compared Weibull and Lognormal Cure Models with Cox regression on the survival of breast cancer. STUDY DESIGN: A cohort study. METHODS: The current study retrospective cohort study was conducted on 140 patients referred to Ali Ibn Abitaleb Hospital, Rafsanjan southeastern Iran from 2001 to 2015 suffering from breast cancer. We determined and analyzed the effective survival causes by different models using STATA14. RESULTS: According to AIC, log-normal model was more consistent than Weibull. In the multivariable Lognormal model, the effective factors like smoking, second -hand smoking, drinking herbal tea and the last breast-feeding period were included. In addition, using Cox regression factors of significant were the disease grade, size of tumor and its metastasis (p-value<0.05). As Rafsanjan is surrounded by pistachio orchards and pesticides applied by farmers, people of this city are exposed to agricultural pesticides and its harmful consequences. The effect of the pesticide on breast cancer was studied and the results showed that the effect of pesticides on breast cancer was not in agreement with the models used in this study. CONCLUSIONS: Based on different methods for survival analysis, researchers can decide how they can reach a better conclusion. This comparison indicates the result of semi-parametric Cox method is closer to clinical experiences evidences.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cox regression; Cure Model; Lognormal; breast cancer
Authors: Thays Millena Alves Pedroso; Marcelino Benvindo-Souza; Felipe de Araújo Nascimento; Júlia Woch; Fabiana Gonçalves Dos Reis; Daniela de Melo E Silva Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Date: 2021-10-19 Impact factor: 5.190
Authors: Vahid Ghavami; Mahmood Mahmoudi; Abbas Rahimi Foroushani; Hossein Baghishani; Fatemeh Homaei Shandiz; Mehdi Yaseri Journal: Asian Pac J Cancer Prev Date: 2017-10-26