Literature DB >> 28412772

Quantitative analysis of external limiting membrane, ellipsoid zone and interdigitation zone defects in patients with macular holes.

Jacques Ramos Houly1,2, Carlos Eduardo Veloso3,4, Elke Passos3,4, Márcio Bittar Nehemy3,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the correlation between the length of external limiting membrane (ELM), ellipsoid zone (EZ) and interdigitation zone (IZ) defects and visual prognosis in patients undergoing macular hole (MH) surgery, using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT).
METHODS: This is a retrospective, consecutive, observational case series study. Fifty-two eyes of 52 patients with primary MH were evaluated. A quantitative analysis of ELM, EZ and IZ defects was performed preoperatively and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively using SD-OCT. The correlation between pre- and postoperative ELM, EZ and IZ defects and the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was investigated.
RESULTS: The lengths of ELM, EZ and IZ defects correlated significantly with BCVA in each study period (P < 0.001). Preoperative measures of these band defects were also associated with visual outcomes 3 and 6 months after surgery (P < 0.05). Considering all preoperative parameters, the length of the ELM defect was the factor most strongly correlated with BCVA at 6 months (β = 0.643, P < 0.012). The integrity of the ELM was the only factor significantly associated with BCVA at 6 months (β = 0.427; P = 0.004).
CONCLUSIONS: The preoperative length of the ELM defect is the strongest predictor of visual acuity after MH surgery. Postoperative integrity of the ELM is significantly associated with visual restoration after surgical treatment of MH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ellipsoid zone; External limiting membrane; Interdigitation zone; Macular hole; Optical coherence tomography; Retina

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28412772     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-017-3636-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  37 in total

1.  Photoreceptor damage and foveal sensitivity in surgically closed macular holes: an adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy study.

Authors:  Sotaro Ooto; Masanori Hangai; Kohei Takayama; Naoko Ueda-Arakawa; Masaaki Hanebuchi; Nagahisa Yoshimura
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  External limiting membrane and visual outcome in macular hole repair: spectral domain OCT analysis.

Authors:  G Landa; R C Gentile; P M T Garcia; T O Muldoon; R B Rosen
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Significant correlation between visual acuity and recovery of foveal cone microstructures after macular hole surgery.

Authors:  Yuji Itoh; Makoto Inoue; Tosho Rii; Tomoyuki Hiraoka; Akito Hirakata
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Idiopathic senile macular hole. Its early stages and pathogenesis.

Authors:  J D Gass
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1988-05

5.  Correlation between length of foveal cone outer segment tips line defect and visual acuity after macular hole closure.

Authors:  Yuji Itoh; Makoto Inoue; Tosho Rii; Tomoyuki Hiraoka; Akito Hirakata
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Correlation Between the Dynamic Postoperative Visual Outcome and the Restoration of Foveal Microstructures After Macular Hole Surgery.

Authors:  Yo-Chen Chang; Wei-Ning Lin; Kuo-Jen Chen; Horng-Jiun Wu; Chia-Ling Lee; Chia-Hui Chen; Kwou-Yeung Wu; Wen-Chuan Wu
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Proposed lexicon for anatomic landmarks in normal posterior segment spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: the IN•OCT consensus.

Authors:  Giovanni Staurenghi; Srinivas Sadda; Usha Chakravarthy; Richard F Spaide
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2014-04-19       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Predicting visual outcome after macular hole surgery using scanning laser ophthalmoscope microperimetry.

Authors:  F Amari; K Ohta; H Kojima; N Yoshimura
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Vitrectomy for the treatment of full-thickness stage 3 or 4 macular holes. Results of a multicentered randomized clinical trial. The Vitrectomy for Treatment of Macular Hole Study Group.

Authors:  W R Freeman; S P Azen; J W Kim; W el-Haig; D R Mishell; I Bailey
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-01

10.  Disruption of the photoreceptor inner segment-outer segment junction in eyes with macular holes.

Authors:  Louis K Chang; Hideki Koizumi; Richard F Spaide
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.256

View more
  4 in total

1.  ASSESSING THE ABILITY OF PREOPERATIVE QUANTITATIVE SPECTRAL-DOMAIN OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY CHARACTERISTICS TO PREDICT VISUAL OUTCOME IN IDIOPATHIC MACULAR HOLE SURGERY.

Authors:  Nitish Mehta; Fabio Lavinsky; Ryan Larochelle; Carl Rebhun; Nihaal B Mehta; Rebecca L Yanovsky; Michael N Cohen; Gregory D Lee; Vaidehi Dedania; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Gadi Wollstein; Joel S Schuman; Nadia Waheed; Yasha Modi
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 3.975

2.  Predictive Association of Pre-Operative Defect Areas in the Outer Retinal Layers With Visual Acuity in Macular Hole Surgery.

Authors:  Carmen Baumann; Danilo Iannetta; Ziyaad Sultan; Ian A Pearce; Chris P Lohmann; Yalin Zheng; Stephen B Kaye
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 3.283

3.  Surgery outcomes of lamellar macular eyes with or without lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hanyue Xu; Ling Qin; Yifan Zhang; Yinan Xiao; Ming Zhang
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 2.209

4.  Longitudinal Assessment of Remnant Foveal Cone Structure in a Case Series of Early Macular Telangiectasia Type 2.

Authors:  Katie M Litts; Mali Okada; Tjebo F C Heeren; Angelos Kalitzeos; Vincent Rocco; Rebecca R Mastey; Navjit Singh; Thomas Kane; Melissa Kasilian; Marcus Fruttiger; Michel Michaelides; Joseph Carroll; Catherine Egan
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 3.048

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.