Literature DB >> 28412721

Are admission procalcitonin levels universal mortality predictors across different medical emergency patient populations? Results from the multi-national, prospective, observational TRIAGE study.

Ramon Sager1, Yannick Wirz1, Devendra Amin1, Adina Amin1, Pierre Hausfater1, Andreas Huber1, Sebastian Haubitz1, Alexander Kutz1, Beat Mueller1, Philipp Schuetz1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Procalcitonin (PCT), an inflammatory blood biomarker, is well studied in infectious diseases. Its prognostic value in unselected emergency department (ED) patients remains yet undefined. Herein, we investigated association of admission PCT levels and mortality in a large, international-multicenter ED patient cohort.
METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 6970 unselected, consecutive, adult, medical patients seeking ED care in three tertiary-care hospitals in Switzerland, France and the USA. We used multivariable logistic regression models to examine association of admission PCT levels (as a continuous predictor and across cut-offs) and 30-day mortality. We also investigated subgroup effects by main diagnosis, comorbidities and clinical features at presentation.
RESULTS: During the 30-day follow-up, 328 (4.7%) participants died. Mortality increased stepwise within higher PCT cut-offs (0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5 ng/mL) from 1%, 3%, 7%, 13% to 15%, respectively. This association was also confirmed in a fully-adjusted model including age, gender, main symptom, main diagnosis and vital parameters on admission. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that PCT differentiated well between survivors and non-survivors in the overall cohort (area under ROC curve [AUC] 0.75) with best results for patient with metabolic (AUC: 0.85) and cardiovascular disease (AUC: 0.82). Addition of PCT also improved the prognostic accuracy of the quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score from an AUC of from 0.61 to 0.76 (p<0.001). Results were similar for other secondary endpoints including intensive care unit (ICU) admission and hospital readmission.
CONCLUSIONS: In this large and heterogenous medical ED patient cohort, admission PCT was a strong and independent outcome predictor for 30-day mortality across different medical diagnoses independent of underlying infection. PCT may help to improve risk stratification in unselected medical ED patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  emergency department; outcome; procalcitonin; risk stratification

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28412721     DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2017-0144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med        ISSN: 1434-6621            Impact factor:   3.694


  10 in total

1.  Circulating biomarkers may be unable to detect infection at the early phase of sepsis in ICU patients: the CAPTAIN prospective multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  Marianna Parlato; François Philippart; Alexandra Rouquette; Virginie Moucadel; Virginie Puchois; Sophie Blein; Jean-Pierre Bedos; Jean-Luc Diehl; Olfa Hamzaoui; Djillali Annane; Didier Journois; Myriam Ben Boutieb; Laurent Estève; Catherine Fitting; Jean-Marc Treluyer; Alexandre Pachot; Minou Adib-Conquy; Jean-Marc Cavaillon; Benoît Misset
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Biomarker cruises in sepsis: who is the CAPTAIN? Discussion on "Circulating biomarkers may be unable to detect infection at the early phase of sepsis in ICU patients: the CAPTAIN prospective multicenter cohort study".

Authors:  George Briassoulis; Panagiotis Briassoulis; Marianna Miliaraki; Stavroula Ilia; Marianna Parlato; François Philippart; Alexandra Rouquette; Virginie Moucadel; Jean-Marc Cavaillon; Benoît Misset
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Diagnosing and Managing Sepsis by Probing the Host Response to Infection: Advances, Opportunities, and Challenges.

Authors:  Ian L Gunsolus; Timothy E Sweeney; Oliver Liesenfeld; Nathan A Ledeboer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Procalcitonin: Where Are We Now?

Authors:  Bachar Hamade; David T Huang
Journal:  Crit Care Clin       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 3.598

5.  Procalcitonin Correlates With but Is Not Superior to Other Diagnostic Markers of Bacterial Pneumonia.

Authors:  Nadia Ayala-Lopez; David R Peaper; Roa Harb
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 2.493

6.  Risk factors associated with short term mortality changes over time, after arrival to the emergency department.

Authors:  Camilla Nørgaard Bech; Mikkel Brabrand; Søren Mikkelsen; Annmarie Lassen
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Comparative quality measures of emergency care: an outcome cockpit proposal to survey clinical processes in real life.

Authors:  Susanne Burgemeister; Alexander Kutz; Antoinette Conca; Thomas Holler; Sebastian Haubitz; Andreas Huber; Ulrich Buergi; Beat Mueller; Philipp Schuetz
Journal:  Open Access Emerg Med       Date:  2017-10-24

Review 8.  Procalcitonin: A promising tool or just another overhyped test?

Authors:  Robin Paudel; Prerna Dogra; Ashley A Montgomery-Yates; Angel Coz Yataco
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2020-01-18       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 9.  Micro- and nanosensors for detecting blood pathogens and biomarkers at different points of sepsis care.

Authors:  Alejandra Alba-Patiño; Andreu Vaquer; Enrique Barón; Steven M Russell; Marcio Borges; Roberto de la Rica
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 5.833

10.  Clinical Outcome Predictive Value of Procalcitonin in Patients Suspected with Infection in the Emergency Department.

Authors:  Pierre Leroux; Sébastien De Ruffi; Laurent Ramont; Marion Gornet; Guillaume Giordano Orsini; Xavier Losset; Lukshe Kanagaratnam; Stéphane Gennai
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 1.112

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.