Literature DB >> 28412588

Online self-test identifies women at high familial breast cancer risk in population-based breast cancer screening without inducing anxiety or distress.

A van Erkelens1, A S Sie1, P Manders2, A Visser3, L E Duijm4, R M Mann5, M Ten Voorde6, H Kroeze6, J B Prins3, N Hoogerbrugge7.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Identifying high familial breast cancer (FBC) risk improves detection of yet unknown BRCA1/2-mutation carriers, for whom BC risk is both highly likely and potentially preventable. We assessed whether a new online self-test could identify women at high FBC risk in population-based BC screening without inducing anxiety or distress.
METHODS: After their visit for screening mammography, women were invited by email to take an online self-test for identifying highly increased FBC risk-based on Dutch guidelines. Exclusion criteria were previously diagnosed as increased FBC risk or a personal history of BC. Anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Dutch Version), distress (Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale) and BC risk perception were assessed using questionnaires, which were completed immediately before and after taking the online self-test and 2 weeks later.
RESULTS: Of the 562 women invited by email, 406 (72%) completed the online self-test while 304 also completed questionnaires (response rate 54%). After exclusion criteria, 287 (51%) were included for data analysis. Median age was 56 years (range 50-74). A high or moderate FBC risk was identified in 12 (4%) and three (1%) women, respectively. After completion of the online self-test, anxiety and BC risk perception were decreased while distress scores remained unchanged. Levels were below clinical relevance. Most women (85%) would recommend the self-test; few (3%) would not.
CONCLUSION: The online self-test identified previously unknown women at high FBC risk (4%), who may carry a BRCA1/2-mutation, without inducing anxiety or distress. We therefore recommend offering this self-test to women who attend population-based screening mammography for the first time.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRCA1; BRCA2; Breast cancer; Distress; Familial risk assessment; Genetic counselling; Hereditary; Population screening; Prevention; Risk

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28412588     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.03.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  7 in total

Review 1.  What characterizes cancer family history collection tools? A critical literature review.

Authors:  J E Cleophat; H Nabi; S Pelletier; K Bouchard; M Dorval
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  Effectiveness of interventions to identify and manage patients with familial cancer risk in primary care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Siang Ing Lee; Mitesh Patel; Brittany Dutton; Stephen Weng; Jocelyn Luveta; Nadeem Qureshi
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2019-05-06

3.  Identification of women at risk of hereditary breast-ovarian cancer among participants in a population-based breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Luigina Bonelli; Ivana Valle; Ivana Rebora; Paola Ricci; Lidia Biocchi; Giovanna Bruschi; Sabrina Parodi; Carla Bruzzone; Liliana Varesco
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 2.446

4.  Effect of interventions including provision of personalised cancer risk information on accuracy of risk perception and psychological responses: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Max Bayne; Madi Fairey; Barbora Silarova; Simon J Griffin; Stephen J Sharp; William M P Klein; Stephen Sutton; Juliet A Usher-Smith
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2019-08-11

5.  Improving primary care identification of familial breast cancer risk using proactive invitation and decision support.

Authors:  Nadeem Qureshi; Brittany Dutton; Stephen Weng; Christina Sheehan; Wendy Chorley; John F R Robertson; Denise Kendrick; Joe Kai
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 6.  The current status of risk-stratified breast screening.

Authors:  Ash Kieran Clift; David Dodwell; Simon Lord; Stavros Petrou; Sir Michael Brady; Gary S Collins; Julia Hippisley-Cox
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 9.075

7.  Dutch women's intended participation in a risk-based breast cancer screening and prevention programme: a survey study identifying preferences, facilitators and barriers.

Authors:  Linda Rainey; Daniëlle van der Waal; Mireille J M Broeders
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 4.430

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.