Literature DB >> 28411910

Renal Tumor Anatomic Complexity: Clinical Implications for Urologists.

Shreyas S Joshi1, Robert G Uzzo2.   

Abstract

Anatomic tumor complexity can be objectively measured and reported using nephrometry. Various scoring systems have been developed in an attempt to correlate tumor complexity with intraoperative and postoperative outcomes. Nephrometry may also predict tumor biology in a noninvasive, reproducible manner. Other scoring systems can help predict surgical complexity and the likelihood of complications, independent of tumor characteristics. The accumulated data in this new field provide provocative evidence that objectifying anatomic complexity can consolidate reporting mechanisms and improve metrics of comparisons. Further prospective validation is needed to understand the full descriptive and predictive ability of the various nephrometry scores.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Kidney cancer; Nephrometry score; Renal mass; Tumor complexity

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28411910     DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2016.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Clin North Am        ISSN: 0094-0143            Impact factor:   2.241


  6 in total

1.  Canadian Urological Association guideline: Management of small renal masses - Full-text.

Authors:  Patrick O Richard; Philippe D Violette; Bimal Bhindi; Rodney H Breau; Wassim Kassouf; Luke T Lavallée; Michael Jewett; John R Kachura; Anil Kapoor; Maxine Noel-Lamy; Michael Ordon; Stephen E Pautler; Frédéric Pouliot; Alan I So; Ricardo A Rendon; Simon Tanguay; Christine Collins; Maryam Kandi; Bobby Shayegan; Andrew Weller; Antonio Finelli; Andrea Kokorovic; Jay Nayak
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  T.H.R.O.B.V.S. Score - A Comprehensive Model to Predict the Surgical Complexity of Renal Cell Carcinoma With Tumor Thrombus.

Authors:  Kai Wang; Zhuo Liu; Peng Hong; Yan-Chun Qin; Xun Zhao; Hong-Xian Zhang; Cheng Liu; Li-Yuan Ge; Lu-Lin Ma
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 5.738

3.  Computer-Generated R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Scores Yield Comparable Predictive Results to Those of Human-Expert Scores in Predicting Oncologic and Perioperative Outcomes.

Authors:  N Heller; R Tejpaul; F Isensee; T Benidir; M Hofmann; P Blake; Z Rengal; K Moore; N Sathianathen; A Kalapara; J Rosenberg; S Peterson; E Walczak; A Kutikov; R G Uzzo; D A Palacios; E M Remer; S C Campbell; N Papanikolopoulos; Christopher J Weight
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 7.600

Review 4.  Role of minimally invasive partial nephrectomy in the management of renal mass.

Authors:  Randall A Lee; David Strauss; Alexander Kutikov
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-12

Review 5.  Nephrometry scoring systems: their importance for the planning of nephron-sparing surgery and the relationships among them.

Authors:  Victor Dubeux; José Fernando Cardona Zanier; Carolina Gianella Cobo Chantong; Fabricio Carrerette; Pedro Nicolau Gabrich; Ronaldo Damião
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2022 Jul-Aug

6.  A retrospective study of open and endoscopic nephron sparing surgery in the treatment of complex renal tumors.

Authors:  Ting-Ting Li; Jia Feng; Yan-Ling Li; Qian Sun
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2021 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.088

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.