Mette S Nielsen1,2, Bodil J Christensen3, Christian Ritz4, Simone Rasmussen4, Thea T Hansen4, Wender L P Bredie5, Carel W le Roux6,7, Anders Sjödin4, Julie B Schmidt4. 1. Department of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, Faculty of Science (Obesity Research Unit), University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 26, 1958, Frederiksberg C, Denmark. msn@nexs.ku.dk. 2. The Danish Diabetes Academy, Odense University Hospital, Sdr Boulevard 129, 5000, Odense C, Denmark. msn@nexs.ku.dk. 3. Department of Food and Resource Economics, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 25, 1958, Frederiksberg C, Denmark. 4. Department of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, Faculty of Science (Obesity Research Unit), University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 26, 1958, Frederiksberg C, Denmark. 5. Department of Food Science, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 26, 1958, Frederiksberg C, Denmark. 6. Investigative Science, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London, SW7 2AZ, UK. 7. Diabetes Complications Research Centre, Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Stillorgan Rd, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) lead to a reduction in energy intake. It is uncertain whether this reduction is simply due to eating smaller portions or if surgery changes food preferences towards less energy-dense food. Previous results rely on verbal reports, which may be prone to recall bias and underestimation of especially unhealthy foods. METHODS: Using an ad libitum buffet meal targeting direct behavior, we investigated if RYGB and SG surgery leads to changes in food preferences. In addition, we assessed food preferences by a picture display test to explore differences between a method relying on verbal report and a method assessing direct behavior. RESULTS: Forty-one subjects (BMI 45.0 ± 6.8 kg/m2) completed a visit pre- and 6 months post-RYGB (n = 31) and SG (n = 10). Mean BMI decreased with 11.7 ± 0.6 kg/m2 and total energy intake at the buffet meal with 54% (4491 ± 208 kJ vs. 2083 ± 208 kJ, P < 0.001), respectively. However, relative energy intake from the following food categories: high-fat, low-fat, sweet, savory, high-fat-savory, high-fat-sweet, low-fat-savory, and low-fat-sweet, as well as energy density did not change following surgery (all P ≥ 0.18). In contrast, the picture display test showed that food from the low-fat-savory group was chosen more often post-surgery (34 ± 8% vs. 65 ± 9%, P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: The reduction in energy intake after RYGB and SG surgery and the subsequent weight loss seems to be primarily related to a reduction in portion sizes and not by changes in food preferences towards less energy-dense foods. These results underline the necessity of investigating eating behavior by targeting direct behavior.
BACKGROUND: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) lead to a reduction in energy intake. It is uncertain whether this reduction is simply due to eating smaller portions or if surgery changes food preferences towards less energy-dense food. Previous results rely on verbal reports, which may be prone to recall bias and underestimation of especially unhealthy foods. METHODS: Using an ad libitum buffet meal targeting direct behavior, we investigated if RYGB and SG surgery leads to changes in food preferences. In addition, we assessed food preferences by a picture display test to explore differences between a method relying on verbal report and a method assessing direct behavior. RESULTS: Forty-one subjects (BMI 45.0 ± 6.8 kg/m2) completed a visit pre- and 6 months post-RYGB (n = 31) and SG (n = 10). Mean BMI decreased with 11.7 ± 0.6 kg/m2 and total energy intake at the buffet meal with 54% (4491 ± 208 kJ vs. 2083 ± 208 kJ, P < 0.001), respectively. However, relative energy intake from the following food categories: high-fat, low-fat, sweet, savory, high-fat-savory, high-fat-sweet, low-fat-savory, and low-fat-sweet, as well as energy density did not change following surgery (all P ≥ 0.18). In contrast, the picture display test showed that food from the low-fat-savory group was chosen more often post-surgery (34 ± 8% vs. 65 ± 9%, P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: The reduction in energy intake after RYGB and SG surgery and the subsequent weight loss seems to be primarily related to a reduction in portion sizes and not by changes in food preferences towards less energy-dense foods. These results underline the necessity of investigating eating behavior by targeting direct behavior.
Authors: Lars Sjöström; Anna-Karin Lindroos; Markku Peltonen; Jarl Torgerson; Claude Bouchard; Björn Carlsson; Sven Dahlgren; Bo Larsson; Kristina Narbro; Carl David Sjöström; Marianne Sullivan; Hans Wedel Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-12-23 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Torsten Olbers; Sofia Björkman; Ak Lindroos; Almantas Maleckas; Lars Lönn; Lars Sjöström; Hans Lönroth Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: A Laurenius; I Larsson; K J Melanson; A K Lindroos; H Lönroth; I Bosaeus; T Olbers Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr Date: 2013-01-09 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Adam P Chambers; Hilary E Wilson-Perez; Sean McGrath; Bernadette E Grayson; Karen K Ryan; David A D'Alessio; Stephen C Woods; Darleen A Sandoval; Randy J Seeley Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Date: 2012-08-28 Impact factor: 4.310
Authors: H E Wilson-Pérez; A P Chambers; D A Sandoval; M A Stefater; S C Woods; S C Benoit; R J Seeley Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2012-02-14 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: Alan C Spector; Natasha Kapoor; Ruth K Price; M Yanina Pepino; M Barbara E Livingstone; Carel W Le Roux Journal: Chem Senses Date: 2019-03-11 Impact factor: 3.160
Authors: Kimberly R Smith; Afroditi Papantoni; Maria G Veldhuizen; Vidyulata Kamath; Civonnia Harris; Timothy H Moran; Susan Carnell; Kimberley E Steele Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2020-08-03 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Christopher M Mulla; Stamatina Zavitsanou; Alejandro Jose Laguna Sanz; David Pober; Lauren Richardson; Pamela Walcott; Ipsa Arora; Brett Newswanger; Martin J Cummins; Steve J Prestrelski; Francis J Doyle; Eyal Dassau; Mary Elizabeth Patti Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2020-04-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Kellie M Hyde; Ginger D Blonde; Marco Bueter; Carel W le Roux; Alan C Spector Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2020-02-21 Impact factor: 3.619
Authors: Mette S Nielsen; Bodil Just Christensen; Julie Berg Schmidt; Louise Tækker; Lotte Holm; Susanne Lunn; Christian Ritz; Nicolai J Wewer Albrechtsen; Jens Juul Holst; Theresia M Schnurr; Torben Hansen; Carel W le Roux; Thomas Bøker Lund; Andrea Karen Floyd; Anders Sjödin Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2020-04-23 Impact factor: 5.095