Literature DB >> 28411275

Odorant Sensory Input Modulates DNA Secondary Structure Formation and Heterogeneous Ribonucleoprotein Recruitment on the Tyrosine Hydroxylase and Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase 1 Promoters in the Olfactory Bulb.

Meng Wang1, Elizabeth Cai1, Nana Fujiwara1, Lilah Fones1, Elizabeth Brown1, Yuchio Yanagawa2, John W Cave3,4.   

Abstract

Adaptation of neural circuits to changes in sensory input can modify several cellular processes within neurons, including neurotransmitter biosynthesis levels. For a subset of olfactory bulb interneurons, activity-dependent changes in GABA are reflected by corresponding changes in Glutamate decarboxylase 1 (Gad1) expression levels. Mechanisms regulating Gad1 promoter activity are poorly understood, but here we show that a conserved G:C-rich region in the mouse Gad1 proximal promoter region both recruits heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins (hnRNPs) that facilitate transcription and forms single-stranded DNA secondary structures associated with transcriptional repression. This promoter architecture and function is shared with Tyrosine hydroxylase (Th), which is also modulated by odorant-dependent activity in the olfactory bulb. This study shows that the balance between DNA secondary structure formation and hnRNP binding on the mouse Th and Gad1 promoters in the olfactory bulb is responsive to changes in odorant-dependent sensory input. These findings reveal that Th and Gad1 share a novel transcription regulatory mechanism that facilitates sensory input-dependent regulation of dopamine and GABA expression.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Adaptation of neural circuits to changes in sensory input can modify several cellular processes within neurons, including neurotransmitter biosynthesis levels. This study shows that transcription of genes encoding rate-limiting enzymes for GABA and dopamine biosynthesis (Gad1 and Th, respectively) in the mammalian olfactory bulb is regulated by G:C-rich regions that both recruit heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins (hnRNPs) to facilitate transcription and form single-stranded DNA secondary structures associated with repression. hnRNP binding and formation of DNA secondary structure on the Th and Gad1 promoters are mutually exclusive, and odorant sensory input levels regulate the balance between these regulatory features. These findings reveal that Th and Gad1 share a transcription regulatory mechanism that facilitates odorant-dependent regulation of dopamine and GABA expression levels.
Copyright © 2017 the authors 0270-6474/17/374778-12$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA secondary structure; GABAergic interneurons; heterogeneous ribonucleoproteins; olfactory bulb; transcription

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28411275      PMCID: PMC5426568          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1363-16.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  64 in total

1.  LAGAN and Multi-LAGAN: efficient tools for large-scale multiple alignment of genomic DNA.

Authors:  Michael Brudno; Chuong B Do; Gregory M Cooper; Michael F Kim; Eugene Davydov; Eric D Green; Arend Sidow; Serafim Batzoglou
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-03-12       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 2.  Making sense of G-quadruplex and i-motif functions in oncogene promoters.

Authors:  Tracy A Brooks; Samantha Kendrick; Laurence Hurley
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 5.542

3.  Interaction of two multifunctional proteins. Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein K and Y-box-binding protein.

Authors:  M Shnyreva; D S Schullery; H Suzuki; Y Higaki; K Bomsztyk
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-05-19       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Small-molecule interaction with a five-guanine-tract G-quadruplex structure from the human MYC promoter.

Authors:  Anh Tuân Phan; Vitaly Kuryavyi; Hai Yan Gaw; Dinshaw J Patel
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2005-07-17       Impact factor: 15.040

5.  GABAergic and glutamatergic identities of developing midbrain Pitx2 neurons.

Authors:  M R Waite; J M Skidmore; A C Billi; J F Martin; D M Martin
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 3.780

6.  Adult naris closure profoundly reduces tyrosine hydroxylase expression in mouse olfactory bulb.

Authors:  H Baker; K Morel; D M Stone; J A Maruniak
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1993-06-18       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Odor-induced, activity-dependent transneuronal gene induction in vitro: mediation by NMDA receptors.

Authors:  A C Puche; M T Shipley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Tyrosine hydroxylase expression in primary cultures of olfactory bulb: role of L-type calcium channels.

Authors:  E Cigola; B T Volpe; J W Lee; L Franzen; H Baker
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  TMPyP4, a Stabilizer of Nucleic Acid Secondary Structure, Is a Novel Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitor.

Authors:  Nana Fujiwara; Michael Mazzola; Elizabeth Cai; Meng Wang; John W Cave
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Increased binding of MeCP2 to the GAD1 and RELN promoters may be mediated by an enrichment of 5-hmC in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) cerebellum.

Authors:  A Zhubi; Y Chen; E Dong; E H Cook; A Guidotti; D R Grayson
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 6.222

View more
  3 in total

1.  Embryonic and postnatal neurogenesis produce functionally distinct subclasses of dopaminergic neuron.

Authors:  Elisa Galliano; Eleonora Franzoni; Marine Breton; Annisa N Chand; Darren J Byrne; Venkatesh N Murthy; Matthew S Grubb
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  Brief sensory deprivation triggers plasticity of dopamine-synthesising enzyme expression in genetically labelled olfactory bulb dopaminergic neurons.

Authors:  Darren J Byrne; Marcela Lipovsek; Andres Crespo; Matthew S Grubb
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 3.698

3.  Characterization of G-quadruplex antibody reveals differential specificity for G4 DNA forms.

Authors:  Saniya M Javadekar; Namrata M Nilavar; Amita Paranjape; Kohal Das; Sathees C Raghavan
Journal:  DNA Res       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 4.458

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.