Literature DB >> 28410638

Utility of Objective Chest Tube Management After Pulmonary Resection Using a Digital Drainage System.

Kazuya Takamochi1, Kota Imashimizu2, Mariko Fukui2, Tatsuo Maeyashiki2, Mikiko Suzuki2, Takuya Ueda2, Hironori Matsuzawa2, Shunki Hirayama2, Takeshi Matsunaga2, Shiaki Oh2, Kenji Suzuki2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We sought to evaluate the clinical utility of chest tube management after pulmonary resection based on objective digital monitoring of pleural pressure and digital surveillance for air leaks.
METHODS: We prospectively recorded the perioperative data of 308 patients who underwent pulmonary resection between December 2013 and January 2016. We used information from a digital monitoring thoracic drainage system to measure peak air leakage during the first 24 hours after the operation, patterns of air leakage over the first 72 hours, and patterns of pleural pressure changes until the chest tubes were removed.
RESULTS: There were 240 patients with lung cancer and 68 patients with other diseases. The operations included 49 wedge resections, 58 segmentectomies, and 201 lobectomies. A postoperative air leak was observed in 61 patients (20%). A prolonged air leak exceeding 20 mL/min lasting 5 days or more was observed in 18 patients (5.8%). Multivariate analysis of various perioperative factors showed forced expiratory volume in 1 second below 70%, patterns of air leakage, defined as exacerbating and remitting or without a trend toward improvement, and peak air leakage of 100 mL/min or more were significant positive predictors of prolonged air leak. Fluctuations in pleural pressure occurred just after the air leakage rate decreased to less than 20 mL/min.
CONCLUSIONS: Digital monitoring of peak air leakage and patterns of air leakage were useful for predicting prolonged air leak after pulmonary resection. Information on the disappearance of air leak could be derived from the change in the rate of air leakage and from the increase in fluctuation of pleural pressure.
Copyright © 2017 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28410638     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.01.061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  7 in total

Review 1.  Enhanced recovery after surgery and video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: the Italian VATS Group surgical protocol.

Authors:  Alessandro Gonfiotti; Domenico Viggiano; Luca Voltolini; Alessandro Bertani; Luca Bertolaccini; Roberto Crisci; Andrea Droghetti
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Work in progress report of a multicentre retrospective observational study to evaluate the association between the airflows and the intrapleural pressures digitally recorded after video-assisted lobectomy.

Authors:  Luca Bertolaccini; Andrea Viti; Pietro Bertoglio; Andrea Imperatori; Angelo Morelli; Francesco Zaraca; Lorenzo Spaggiari; Roberto Crisci
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-08-18

3.  Usefulness of monitoring intrapleural pressure with digital chest drainage system for the management of air leakage after lung resection.

Authors:  Daisuke Eriguchi; Hiroyuki Ito; Takuya Nagashima; Hiroyuki Adachi; Joji Samejima; Daiji Nemoto; Haruhiko Nakayama; Norihiko Ikeda
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-10-04

4.  Low suction on digital drainage devices promptly improves post-operative air leaks following lung resection operations: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Suguru Mitsui; Shunsuke Tauchi; Takahiro Uchida; Hisashi Ohnishi; Toshio Shimokawa; Satoshi Tobe
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 1.637

5.  Use of a novel digital drainage system after pulmonary resection.

Authors:  Travis C Geraci; Audrey Sorensen; Les James; Stacey Chen; Mohamed El Zaeedi; Robert J Cerfolio; Michael Zervos
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 3.005

6.  Multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing digital and traditional chest drain in a VATS pulmonary lobectomy cohort: interim analysis.

Authors:  Paolo Mendogni; Davide Tosi; Giuseppe Marulli; Giovanni Maria Comacchio; Sara Pieropan; Veronica Rossi; Debora Brascia; Luigi Gaetano Andriolo; Giovanna Imbriglio; Gianluca Bonitta; Camillo Lopez; Federico Rea; Mario Nosotti
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 1.637

7.  Digital versus analogue chest drainage system in patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Dieuwertje Ruigrok; Peter W A Kunst; Marielle M J Blacha; Ben Tomlow; Jacobine W Herbrink; Eva J Japenga; Wim Boersma; Paul Bresser; Ivo van der Lee; Kris Mooren
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 3.317

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.