OBJECTIVES: To compare accuracy of a continuous noninvasive cutaneous temperature using zero-heat-flux method to esophageal temperature and arterial temperature. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: ICU and NeuroICU, University Hospital. PATIENTS: Fifty-two ICU patients over a 4-month period who required continuous temperature monitoring were included in the study, after informed consent. INTERVENTIONS: All patients had esophageal temperature probe and a noninvasive cutaneous device to monitor their core temperature continuously. In seven patients who required cardiac output monitoring, continuous iliac arterial temperature was collected. Simultaneous core temperatures were recorded from 1 to 5 days. Comparison to the esophageal temperature, considered as the reference in this study, used the Bland and Altman method with adjustment for multiple measurements per patient. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The esophageal temperature ranged from 33°C to 39.7°C, 61,298 pairs of temperature using zero-heat-flux and esophageal temperature were collected and 1,850 triple of temperature using zero-heat-flux, esophageal temperature, and arterial temperature. Bias and limits of agreement for temperature using zero-heat-flux were 0.19°C ± 0.53°C compared with esophageal temperature with an absolute difference of temperature pairs equal to or lower than 0.5°C of 92.6% (95% CI, 91.9-93.4%) of cases and equal to or lower than 1°C for 99.9% (95% CI, 99.7-100.0%) of cases. Compared with arterial temperature, bias and limits of agreement were -0.00°C ± 0.36°C with an absolute difference of temperature pairs equal to or lower than 0.5°C of 99.8% (95% CI, 95.3-100%) of cases. All absolute difference of temperature pairs between temperature using zero-heat-flux and arterial temperature and between arterial temperature and esophageal temperature were equal to or lower than 1°C. No local or systemic serious complication was observed. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest a comparable reliability of the cutaneous sensor using the zero-heat-flux method compared with esophageal or iliac arterial temperatures measurements.
OBJECTIVES: To compare accuracy of a continuous noninvasive cutaneous temperature using zero-heat-flux method to esophageal temperature and arterial temperature. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: ICU and NeuroICU, University Hospital. PATIENTS: Fifty-two ICU patients over a 4-month period who required continuous temperature monitoring were included in the study, after informed consent. INTERVENTIONS: All patients had esophageal temperature probe and a noninvasive cutaneous device to monitor their core temperature continuously. In seven patients who required cardiac output monitoring, continuous iliac arterial temperature was collected. Simultaneous core temperatures were recorded from 1 to 5 days. Comparison to the esophageal temperature, considered as the reference in this study, used the Bland and Altman method with adjustment for multiple measurements per patient. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The esophageal temperature ranged from 33°C to 39.7°C, 61,298 pairs of temperature using zero-heat-flux and esophageal temperature were collected and 1,850 triple of temperature using zero-heat-flux, esophageal temperature, and arterial temperature. Bias and limits of agreement for temperature using zero-heat-flux were 0.19°C ± 0.53°C compared with esophageal temperature with an absolute difference of temperature pairs equal to or lower than 0.5°C of 92.6% (95% CI, 91.9-93.4%) of cases and equal to or lower than 1°C for 99.9% (95% CI, 99.7-100.0%) of cases. Compared with arterial temperature, bias and limits of agreement were -0.00°C ± 0.36°C with an absolute difference of temperature pairs equal to or lower than 0.5°C of 99.8% (95% CI, 95.3-100%) of cases. All absolute difference of temperature pairs between temperature using zero-heat-flux and arterial temperature and between arterial temperature and esophageal temperature were equal to or lower than 1°C. No local or systemic serious complication was observed. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest a comparable reliability of the cutaneous sensor using the zero-heat-flux method compared with esophageal or iliac arterial temperatures measurements.
Authors: Alexander C Stahn; Andreas Werner; Oliver Opatz; Martina A Maggioni; Mathias Steinach; Victoria Weller von Ahlefeld; Alan Moore; Brian E Crucian; Scott M Smith; Sara R Zwart; Thomas Schlabs; Stefan Mendt; Tobias Trippel; Eberhard Koralewski; Jochim Koch; Alexander Choukèr; Günther Reitz; Peng Shang; Lothar Röcker; Karl A Kirsch; Hanns-Christian Gunga Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-11-23 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Melissa Wagner; Krista Lim-Hing; Mary Ann Bautista; Brigid Blaber; Taghi Ryder; Joseph Haymore; Neeraj Badjatia Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2021-04 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Eero Pesonen; Marja Silvasti-Lundell; Tomi T Niemi; Riku Kivisaari; Juha Hernesniemi; Marja-Tellervo Mäkinen Journal: J Clin Monit Comput Date: 2018-11-22 Impact factor: 2.502
Authors: Peter Paal; Mathieu Pasquier; Tomasz Darocha; Raimund Lechner; Sylweriusz Kosinski; Bernd Wallner; Ken Zafren; Hermann Brugger Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-01-03 Impact factor: 3.390