Literature DB >> 28409674

Comparing Rural and Urban Cervical and Breast Cancer Screening Rates in a Privately Insured Population.

John Orwat1, Nadine Caputo2, Whitney Key1, Jeanne De Sa3.   

Abstract

Low preventive screening varies by region and contributes to poor outcomes for breast and cervical cancer. Previous comparative urban and rural research on preventive screening has focused on government programs. This study quantified and compared rural and urban preventive cancer screening rates for women who were privately insured. National Quality Forum measures were used to calculate rates for women within rural and urban parts of the same Hospital Referral Region (HRR) using claims data. Mammography screening rates for women age 24 to 69 years were 77.1% in 2011 and 76.1% in 2008. Compared to urban women, mammography screening rates for women visiting rural physicians were lower in 42%, higher in 2% and identical in 56% of HRRs. Cervical cancer screening rates for women age 21 to 64 years were 82.9% in 2011 and 83.5% in 2008. Cervical cancer screening rates among women who saw rural physicians were lower in 55%, higher in 4%, and identical in 42% of HRRs. HRRs where rural areas underperformed urban areas increased between 2008 and 2011 for both screenings. Moderate but notable differences in women's preventive screening rates between rural and urban physicians highlight the need for practical solutions that increase use of screening services and reduce barriers to services in rural areas.

Entities:  

Keywords:  commercially insured population; preventive screening; rural health; women’s health

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28409674     DOI: 10.1080/19371918.2017.1289872

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Work Public Health        ISSN: 1937-190X


  6 in total

1.  Socioeconomic disadvantage and human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination uptake.

Authors:  Shaheen Kurani; Kathy L MacLaughlin; Robert M Jacobson; Jennifer L St Sauver; Gregory D Jenkins; Chun Fan; Debra J Jacobson; Jonathan Inselman; Xuan Zhu; Joan M Griffin; Lila J Finney Rutten
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 2.  Strategies to Achieve Breast Health Equity in the St. Louis Region and Beyond over 15+ Years.

Authors:  Bettina Drake; Aimee James; Heidi Miller; Akila Anandarajah; Kia L Davis; Sheryll Jackson; Graham A Colditz; Vetta Sanders Thompson
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 3.  Educational Interventions to Promote Cervical Cancer Screening among Rural Populations: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Mengyue Zhang; Janet W H Sit; Dorothy Ngo Sheung Chan; Oluwadamilare Akingbade; Carmen W H Chan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-04       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  Rural-Urban Differences in Breast Cancer Stage at Diagnosis.

Authors:  Gabrielle LeBlanc; Inkoo Lee; Henry Carretta; Yi Luo; Debajyoti Sinha; George Rust
Journal:  Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle)       Date:  2022-02-14

5.  Social and territorial inequalities in breast and cervical cancers screening uptake: a cross-sectional study in France.

Authors:  Cyrille Delpierre; Pascale Grosclaude; Lisa Ouanhnon; Marie-Eve Rougé Bugat; Sebastien Lamy; Vladimir Druel
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Determinants of Population-Based Cancer Screening Performance at Primary Healthcare Institutions in China.

Authors:  Senshuang Zheng; Xiaorui Zhang; Marcel J W Greuter; Geertruida H de Bock; Wenli Lu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.