Literature DB >> 28409669

Treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures: extended follow-up of a randomized clinical trial comparing orthosis versus no orthosis.

Jennifer C Urquhart1, Osama A Alrehaili1, Charles G Fisher2, Alyssa Fleming1, Parham Rasoulinejad1, Kevin Gurr1, Stewart I Bailey1, Fawaz Siddiqi1, Christopher S Bailey1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE A multicenter, prospective, randomized equivalence trial comparing a thoracolumbosacral orthosis (TLSO) to no orthosis (NO) in the treatment of acute AO Type A3 thoracolumbar burst fractures was recently conducted and demonstrated that the two treatments following an otherwise similar management protocol are equivalent at 3 months postinjury. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether there was a difference in long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes between the patients treated with and those treated without a TLSO. Here, the authors present the 5- to 10-year outcomes (mean follow-up 7.9 ± 1.1 years) of the patients at a single site from the original multicenter trial. METHODS Between July 2002 and January 2009, a total of 96 subjects were enrolled in the primary trial and randomized to two groups: TLSO or NO. Subjects were enrolled if they had an AO Type A3 burst fracture between T-10 and L-3 within the previous 72 hours, kyphotic deformity < 35°, no neurological deficit, and an age of 16-60 years old. The present study represents a subset of those patients: 16 in the TLSO group and 20 in the NO group. The primary outcome measure was the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) score at the last 5- to 10-year follow-up. Secondary outcome measures included kyphosis, satisfaction, the Numeric Rating Scale for back pain, and the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) Mental and Physical Component Summary (MCS and PCS) scores. In the original study, outcome measures were administered at admission and 2 and 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months, and 1 and 2 years after injury; in the present extended follow-up study, the outcome measures were administered 5-10 years postinjury. Treatment comparison between patients in the TLSO group and those in the NO group was performed at the latest available follow-up, and the time-weighted average treatment effect was determined using a mixed-effects model of longitudinal regression for repeated measures averaged over all time periods. Missing data were assumed to be missing at random and were replaced with a set of plausible values derived using a multiple imputation procedure. RESULTS The RMDQ score at 5-10 years postinjury was 3.6 ± 0.9 (mean ± SE) for the TLSO group and 4.8 ± 1.5 for the NO group (p = 0.486, 95% CI -2.3 to 4.8). Average kyphosis was 18.3° ± 2.2° for the TLSO group and 18.6° ± 3.8° for the NO group (p = 0.934, 95% CI -7.8 to 8.5). No differences were found between the NO and TLSO groups with time-weighted average treatment effects for RMDQ 1.9 (95% CI -1.5 to 5.2), for PCS -2.5 (95% CI -7.9 to 3.0), for MCS -1.2 (95% CI -6.7 to 4.2) and for average pain 0.9 (95% CI -0.5 to 2.2). CONCLUSIONS Compared with patients treated with a TLSO, patients treated using early mobilization without orthosis maintain similar pain relief and improvement in function for 5-10 years.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MCS = Mental Component Summary; NO = no orthosis; NRS = Numeric Rating Scale; PCS = Physical Component Summary; RMDQ = Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire; TLSO = thoracolumbosacral orthosis; burst fracture; spine; thoracolumbar; thoracolumbosacral orthosis; trauma

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28409669     DOI: 10.3171/2016.11.SPINE161031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  5 in total

1.  [Treatment of trauma-related vertebral body fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine with orthotic devices : A review].

Authors:  Philipp Georg Schnadthorst; Celine Lankes; Christoph Schulze
Journal:  Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-07-18

2.  Calcitonin (FORTICAL, MIACALCIN) for the treatment of vertebral compression fractures.

Authors:  Alicia Kaneb; Kevin Berardino; Josephine S Hanukaai; Kelsey Rooney; Alan D Kaye
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2021-06-21

3.  Indications for Nonsurgical Treatment of Thoracolumbar Spine Fractures: WFNS Spine Committee Recommendations.

Authors:  Nikolay Peev; Mehmet Zileli; Salman Sharif; Shahswar Arif; Zarina Brady
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2021-12-31

4.  An Indication-Based Concept for Stepwise Spinal Orthosis in Low Back Pain According to the Current Literature.

Authors:  Franz Landauer; Klemens Trieb
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  The Role of Spinal Orthoses in Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures of the Elderly Population (Age 60 Years or Older): Systematic Review.

Authors:  Barry Ting Sheen Kweh; Hui Qing Lee; Terence Tan; Joost Rutges; Travis Marion; Kim Siong Tew; Vikram Bhalla; Shyaman Menon; Fetullah Cumhur Oner; Charles Fisher; Jin Wee Tee
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-09-29
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.