Literature DB >> 28408367

Variability in Chromatin Architecture and Associated DNA Repair at Genomic Positions Containing Somatic Mutations.

Byungho Lim1, Jihyeob Mun1,2, Yong Sung Kim2,3, Seon-Young Kim4,2.   

Abstract

Dynamic chromatin structures result in differential chemical reactivity to mutational processes throughout the genome. To identify chromatin features responsible for mutagenesis, we compared chromatin architecture around single-nucleotide variants (SNV), insertion/deletions (indels), and their context-matched, nonmutated positions. We found epigenetic differences between genomic regions containing missense SNVs and those containing frameshift indels across multiple cancer types. Levels of active histone marks were higher around frameshift indels than around missense SNV, whereas repressive histone marks exhibited the reverse trend. Accumulation of repressive histone marks and nucleosomes distinguished mutated positions (both SNV and indels) from the context-matched, nonmutated positions, whereas active marks were associated with substitution- and cancer type-specific mutagenesis. We also explained mutagenesis based on genome maintenance mechanisms, including nucleotide excision repair (NER), mismatch repair (MMR), and DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE). Regional NER variation correlated strongly with chromatin features; NER machineries exhibited shifted or depleted binding around SNV, resulting in decreased NER at mutation positions, especially at sites of recurrent mutations. MMR-deficient tumors selectively acquired SNV in regions with high active histone marks, especially H3K36me3, whereas POLE-deficient tumors selectively acquired indels and SNV in regions with low active histone marks. These findings demonstrate the importance of fine-scaled chromatin structures and associated DNA repair mechanisms in mutagenesis. Cancer Res; 77(11); 2822-33. ©2017 AACR. ©2017 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28408367     DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-3033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  10 in total

1.  Genome-wide mapping of nucleotide excision repair with XR-seq.

Authors:  Jinchuan Hu; Wentao Li; Ogun Adebali; Yanyan Yang; Onur Oztas; Christopher P Selby; Aziz Sancar
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 13.491

2.  Dynamic maps of UV damage formation and repair for the human genome.

Authors:  Jinchuan Hu; Ogun Adebali; Sheera Adar; Aziz Sancar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Exons and introns exhibit transcriptional strand asymmetry of dinucleotide distribution, damage formation and DNA repair.

Authors:  Elisheva E Heilbrun; May Merav; Sheera Adar
Journal:  NAR Genom Bioinform       Date:  2021-03-27

Review 4.  The impact of epigenetic information on genome evolution.

Authors:  Soojin V Yi; Michael A D Goodisman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 6.671

5.  Explaining cancer type specific mutations with transcriptomic and epigenomic features in normal tissues.

Authors:  Khong-Loon Tiong; Chen-Hsiang Yeang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  H3K36me3, message from chromatin to DNA damage repair.

Authors:  Zhongxing Sun; Yanjun Zhang; Junqi Jia; Yuan Fang; Yin Tang; Hongfei Wu; Dong Fang
Journal:  Cell Biosci       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 7.133

7.  Mutation bias reflects natural selection in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  J Grey Monroe; Thanvi Srikant; Pablo Carbonell-Bejerano; Claude Becker; Mariele Lensink; Moises Exposito-Alonso; Marie Klein; Julia Hildebrandt; Manuela Neumann; Daniel Kliebenstein; Mao-Lun Weng; Eric Imbert; Jon Ågren; Matthew T Rutter; Charles B Fenster; Detlef Weigel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 69.504

8.  Human genes differ by their UV sensitivity estimated through analysis of UV-induced silent mutations in melanoma.

Authors:  Ivan P Gorlov; Christopher I Amos; Spiridon Tsavachidis; Colin Begg; Eva Hernando; Chao Cheng; Ronglai Shen; Irene Orlow; Li Luo; Marc S Ernstoff; Joel Parker; Nancy E Thomas; Olga Y Gorlova; Marianne Berwick
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 4.700

9.  Nanopore sequencing and Hi-C scaffolding provide insight into the evolutionary dynamics of transposable elements and piRNA production in wild strains of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Christopher E Ellison; Weihuan Cao
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Anti-tumor immunity in mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancers requires type I IFN-driven CCL5 and CXCL10.

Authors:  Courtney Mowat; Shayla R Mosley; Afshin Namdar; Daniel Schiller; Kristi Baker
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 14.307

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.