Literature DB >> 28408203

Surgeon Involvement in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in the United States: A 2016 Society of Thoracic Surgeons Survey.

Joseph E Bavaria1, Richard L Prager2, Keith S Naunheim3, Mark S Allen4, Robert S D Higgins5, Vinod H Thourani6, Thomas E MacGillivray7, Natalie Boden8, Joseph F Sabik9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) surveyed cardiothoracic surgeon participants in its Adult Cardiac Surgery Database (ACSD) to learn the extent of surgeon involvement in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedures.
METHODS: An electronic survey was delivered to 2,594 surgeons in June 2016. When the survey closed 2 weeks later, 487 completed surveys had been submitted for a response rate of 18.8%.
RESULTS: Among the 487 participants in the ACSD who responded to the survey, 410 (84.2%) reported that TAVR was performed at their institutions. Approximately three-quarters reported that they performed TAVR procedures as part of a heart team (77.5%; 313 of 404), cardiologists and cardiothoracic surgeons were jointly responsible for TAVR referrals (83.7%; 339 of 405), and TAVR programs were administered either jointly by the cardiology and cardiac surgery departments or exclusively by the cardiac surgery department (73.3%; 297 of 405). A majority were involved in the pre-, intra-, and postoperative care of patients undergoing TAVR, with 91.4% (370 of 405) reporting participation in multidisciplinary meetings, at least 50% regularly performing technical aspects in 10 of 11 conduct of operation categories, and 86.6% (266 of 307) caring for patients undergoing TAVR after the procedure.
CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac surgeons in the United States are active participants in the management of patients with aortic stenosis as part of the heart team. The STS survey found that not only were they actively involved in the treatment decision-making process but they also played a significant role in the valve procedure, including deployment and postprocedural care. The heart team model continues to evolve and should be expanded into other areas of structural heart disease.
Copyright © 2017 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28408203     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.03.055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  5 in total

1.  Need of the hour: Structural heart intervention training for trainee surgeons in India.

Authors:  Srikanth Kasturi
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-09-09

2.  Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Interventions by Single or Multiple Operators: Insights From the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking Program.

Authors:  Christopher P Kovach; Annika Hebbe; Anna E Barón; Aaron Strobel; Mary E Plomondon; Javier A Valle; Stephen W Waldo
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 5.501

3.  How Many Operators Are Optimal for Higher-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Procedures?

Authors:  Jinhyun Lee; Jeffrey W Moses; Ajay J Kirtane
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 5.501

4.  Physicians' perspectives and attitudes toward surgical bailout in transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Alexandria J Robbins; Stuart W Grande; Fatima Alwan; Matthew R Soule; Ganesh Raveendran; Gregory Helmer; Rafael Andrade; Tjorvi Perry
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2022-01-21

5.  The utilization of educational resources published by the Thoracic Surgery Residents Association.

Authors:  Alexander A Brescia; Clauden Louis; Jessica G Y Luc; Garrett N Coyan; Jason J Han; David Blitzer; Fatima G Wilder; Curtis S Bergquist; Jordan P Bloom; Rishindra M Reddy; Gurjit Sandhu; J Hunter Mehaffey
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2022-05-13
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.