Literature DB >> 28408150

Adaptive and maladaptive neural compensatory consequences of sensory deprivation-From a phantom percept perspective.

Anusha Mohan1, Sven Vanneste2.   

Abstract

It is suggested that the brain undergoes plastic changes in order to adapt to changing environmental needs. Sensory deprivation results in decreased input to the brain leading to adaptive or maladaptive changes. Although several theories hypothesize the mechanism of these adaptive and maladaptive changes, the course of action taken by the brain heavily depends on the age of incidence of damage. The growing body of literature on the topic proposes that maladaptive changes in the brain are instrumental in creating phantom percepts, defined as the perception of a sensory experience in the absence of a physical stimulus. The current article reviews the mechanisms of adaptive and maladaptive plasticity in the brain in congenital, early, and late-onset sensory deprivation in conjunction with the phantom percepts in the different sensory domains. We propose that the mechanisms of adaptive and maladaptive plasticity fall under a universal construct of updating hierarchical Bayesian prediction errors. This theory of the Bayesian brain hypothesizes that the brain constantly compares its internal milieu with changing environmental cues and either adjusts its predictions or discards the change, depending on the novelty or salience of the external stimulus. We propose that adaptive plasticity reflects both successful bottom-up compensation and top-down updating of the model while maladaptive plasticity reflects failure in one or both mechanisms, resulting in a constant prediction-error. Finally, we hypothesize that phantom percepts are generated by the brain as a solution to this prediction error and are thus a manifestation of unsuccessful adaptation to sensory deprivation.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Critical period; Deafferentation; Plasticity; Prediction-error

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28408150     DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2017.03.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Neurobiol        ISSN: 0301-0082            Impact factor:   11.685


  9 in total

1.  Frontostriatal network dysfunction as a domain-general mechanism underlying phantom perception.

Authors:  Jeffrey Hullfish; Ian Abenes; Hye Bin Yoo; Dirk De Ridder; Sven Vanneste
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Cerebellar Volume Is Associated with Cognitive Decline in Mild Cognitive Impairment: Results from ADNI.

Authors:  Chi-Ying Lin; Chi-Hua Chen; Sarah E Tom; Sheng-Han Kuo
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  Top-down and Bottom-up Regulated Auditory Phantom Perception.

Authors:  Sven Vanneste; Ola Alsalman; Dirk De Ridder
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Motor correlates of phantom limb pain.

Authors:  Sanne Kikkert; Melvin Mezue; David Henderson Slater; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Irene Tracey; Tamar R Makin
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 4.027

Review 5.  Understanding and Measuring the Cognitive Load of Amputees for Rehabilitation and Prosthesis Development.

Authors:  Robin Rackerby; Stephan Lukosch; Deborah Munro
Journal:  Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl       Date:  2022-07-13

6.  The neural correlates of the unified percept of alcohol-related craving: a fMRI and EEG study.

Authors:  Yuefeng Huang; Anusha Mohan; Dirk De Ridder; Stefan Sunaert; Sven Vanneste
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Investigating functional changes in the brain to intermittently induced auditory illusions and its relevance to chronic tinnitus.

Authors:  Anusha Mohan; Neil Bhamoo; Juan S Riquelme; Samantha Long; Arnaud Norena; Sven Vanneste
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Neural basis of induced phantom limb pain relief.

Authors:  Sanne Kikkert; Melvin Mezue; Jacinta O'Shea; David Henderson Slater; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Irene Tracey; Tamar R Makin
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 10.422

Review 9.  [Psychopathological consequences of confinement].

Authors:  A Mengin; M C Allé; J Rolling; F Ligier; C Schroder; L Lalanne; F Berna; R Jardri; G Vaiva; P A Geoffroy; P Brunault; F Thibaut; A Chevance; A Giersch
Journal:  Encephale       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 1.291

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.