Literature DB >> 28408078

Adoption of Radiation Technology Among Privately Insured Nonelderly Patients With Cancer in the United States, 2008 to 2014: A Claims-Based Analysis.

Hubert Y Pan1, Jing Jiang2, Ya-Chen Tina Shih2, Benjamin D Smith3.   

Abstract

Despite enthusiasm for advanced radiation technologies, understanding of their adoption in recent years is limited. The aim of this study was to elucidate utilization trends of conventional radiation, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), brachytherapy, proton radiotherapy, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) using a large convenience sample of irradiated patients with cancer identified from private insurance claims in the United States. The unit of analysis was a claim corresponding to a fraction of delivered radiotherapy from 2008 to 2014. Each claim was assigned a disease site on the basis of the diagnosis code and a radiation technology on the basis of the procedure code. In 2014, conventional radiation and IMRT constituted 56% and 39% of all radiation treatment claims, respectively, while brachytherapy constituted 2%, proton radiotherapy 1%, SBRT 1%, and SRS <1%. Compared with the first quarter of 2008, the proportional contribution of conventional radiation and brachytherapy to all radiation claims each decreased by 16% in the fourth quarter of 2014. In contrast, proportional contribution increased by 32% for IMRT, 83% for proton radiotherapy, 124% for SRS, and 309% for SBRT. Prostate cancer constituted 60% of all proton claims in 2008 but declined to 37% by 2014. SBRT was used to treat a variety of disease sites, most commonly primary lung (25%), prostate (12%), secondary bone (9%), and secondary lung (9%), in 2014. In this claims-based analysis of younger patients with private insurance, conventional radiation and IMRT were the most commonly used technologies from 2008 to 2014, while SBRT showed the most robust growth over the study period.
Copyright © 2017 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Radiotherapy; clinical practice patterns; radiologic technology; stereotactic body radiotherapy; technology adoption

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28408078     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.02.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  7 in total

1.  Patterns of stereotactic body radiation therapy: The influence of lung cancer treatment on prostate cancer treatment.

Authors:  Bruce L Jacobs; Jonathan G Yabes; Samia H Lopa; Dwight E Heron; Chung-Chou H Chang; Justin E Bekelman; Joel B Nelson; Julie P W Bynum; Amber E Barnato; Jeremy M Kahn
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 3.498

2.  Sea Change: A Decade of Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Treatment of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Grace L Smith; Benjamin D Smith
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Comparative Toxicities and Cost of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy, Proton Radiation, and Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Among Younger Men With Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Hubert Y Pan; Jing Jiang; Karen E Hoffman; Chad Tang; Seungtaek L Choi; Quynh-Nhu Nguyen; Steven J Frank; Mitchell S Anscher; Ya-Chen Tina Shih; Benjamin D Smith
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Multiple Computed Tomography Robust Optimization to Account for Random Anatomic Density Variations During Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy.

Authors:  Mingyao Zhu; Adeel Kaiser; Mark V Mishra; Young Kwok; Jill Remick; Cristina DeCesaris; Katja M Langen
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-12-26

5.  Physics and biomedical challenges of cancer therapy with accelerated heavy ions.

Authors:  Marco Durante; Jürgen Debus; Jay S Loeffler
Journal:  Nat Rev Phys       Date:  2021-09-17

6.  Clinical utilization of radiation therapy in Korea, 2016.

Authors:  Eunji Kim; Won Il Jang; Mi-Sook Kim; Eun Kyung Paik; Hee Jin Kim; Hyung Jun Yoo; Kwangmo Yang; Chul Koo Cho
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 2.724

7.  Cost-Effectiveness Models of Proton Therapy for Head and Neck: Evaluating Quality and Methods to Date.

Authors:  Danmeng Huang; Steven J Frank; Vivek Verma; Nikhil G Thaker; Eric D Brooks; Matthew B Palmer; Ross F Harrison; Ashish A Deshmukh; Matthew S Ning
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2021-06-25
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.