Literature DB >> 28407994

The PMA Scale: A Measure of Physicians' Motivation to Adopt Medical Devices.

Maximilian H M Hatz1, Tim Sonnenschein1, Carl Rudolf Blankart2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies have often stated that individual-level determinants are important drivers for the adoption of medical devices. Empirical evidence supporting this claim is, however, scarce. At the individual level, physicians' adoption motivation was often considered important in the context of adoption decisions, but a clear notion of its dimensions and corresponding measurement scales is not available.
OBJECTIVES: To develop and subsequently validate a scale to measure the motivation to adopt medical devices of hospital-based physicians.
METHODS: The development and validation of the physician-motivation-adoption (PMA) scale were based on a literature search, internal expert meetings, a pilot study with physicians, and a three-stage online survey. The data collected in the online survey were analyzed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and the PMA scale was revised according to the results. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to test the results from the EFA in the third stage. Reliability and validity tests and subgroup analyses were also conducted.
RESULTS: Overall, 457 questionnaires were completed by medical personnel of the National Health Service England. The EFA favored a six-factor solution to appropriately describe physicians' motivation. The CFA confirmed the results from the EFA. Our tests indicated good reliability and validity of the PMA scale.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first reliable and valid scale to measure physicians' adoption motivation. Future adoption studies assessing the individual level should include the PMA scale to obtain more information about the role of physicians' motivation in the broader adoption context.
Copyright © 2017 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  adoption of medical devices; health technology adoption; motivation; scale

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28407994     DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  5 in total

Review 1.  Impact of Design on Medical Device Safety.

Authors:  Teodora Miclăuş; Vasiliki Valla; Angeliki Koukoura; Anne Ahlmann Nielsen; Benedicte Dahlerup; Georgios-Ioannis Tsianos; Efstathios Vassiliadis
Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 1.778

Review 2.  The Utilization of Medical Devices by Traditional Korean Medicine Doctors Investigated through Traditional Korean Medicine Clinical Studies.

Authors:  Soo-Hyun Sung; Hee-Ju Sim; Eu-Gene Kim; Angela Dongmin Sung; Jung-Youn Park; Byung-Cheul Shin; Min-Jung Park; Chang Hyun Han; Jang-Kyung Park
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 2.629

3.  Examining the Factors Influencing Orthopedic Physician's Decision to Purchase Medical Devices: Evidence from Kuwait.

Authors:  Mohamed Gendia; Hamed M Shamma
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2022-03-01

4.  Utilising low-cost, easy-to-use microscopy techniques for early peritonitis infection screening in peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Mark Buckup; Janelle M Kaneda; Alisha M Birk; Eleanor Glockner; Ross Venook; Aditya Jain; Shuchita Sharma; Cynthia Wong; Ken Sutha
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Use of Telemedicine Technology among General Practitioners during COVID-19: A Modified Technology Acceptance Model Study in Poland.

Authors:  Renata Walczak; Magdalena Kludacz-Alessandri; Liliana Hawrysz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 4.614

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.