Literature DB >> 28407966

Detection of several common adulterants in raw milk by MID-infrared spectroscopy and one-class and multi-class multivariate strategies.

Carina de Souza Gondim1, Roberto Gonçalves Junqueira2, Scheilla Vitorino Carvalho de Souza2, Itziar Ruisánchez3, M Pilar Callao4.   

Abstract

A sequential strategy was proposed to detect adulterants in milk using a mid-infrared spectroscopy and soft independent modelling of class analogy technique. Models were set with low target levels of adulterations including formaldehyde (0.074g.L-1), hydrogen peroxide (21.0g.L-1), bicarbonate (4.0g.L-1), carbonate (4.0g.L-1), chloride (5.0g.L-1), citrate (6.5g.L-1), hydroxide (4.0g.L-1), hypochlorite (0.2g.L-1), starch (5.0g.L-1), sucrose (5.4g.L-1) and water (150g.L-1). In the first step, a one-class model was developed with unadulterated samples, providing 93.1% sensitivity. Four poorly assigned adulterants were discarded for the following step (multi-class modelling). Then, in the second step, a multi-class model, which considered unadulterated and formaldehyde-, hydrogen peroxide-, citrate-, hydroxide- and starch-adulterated samples was implemented, providing 82% correct classifications, 17% inconclusive classifications and 1% misclassifications. The proposed strategy was considered efficient as a screening approach since it would reduce the number of samples subjected to confirmatory analysis, time, costs and errors.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adulterant detection; Formaldehyde (PubChem CID: 712); Hydrogen peroxide (PubChem CID: 784); Milk adulteration; Multi-class modelling; Multivariate SIMCA screening; One-class modelling; Sodium bicarbonate (PubChem CID: 516892); Sodium carbonate (PubChem CID: 10340); Sodium chloride (PubChem CID: 5234); Sodium citrate (PubChem CID: 23666341); Sodium hydroxide (PubChem CID: 14798); Sodium hypochlorite (PubChem CID: 23665760); Starch (PubChem CID: 24836924); Sucrose (PubChem CID: 5988).

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28407966     DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.03.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Chem        ISSN: 0308-8146            Impact factor:   7.514


  5 in total

Review 1.  A Review on Recent Sensing Methods for Determining Formaldehyde in Agri-Food Chain: A Comparison with the Conventional Analytical Approaches.

Authors:  Luigi Fappiano; Fabiana Carriera; Alessia Iannone; Ivan Notardonato; Pasquale Avino
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-05-06

2.  On the utilization of deep and ensemble learning to detect milk adulteration.

Authors:  Habib Asseiss Neto; Wanessa L F Tavares; Daniela C S Z Ribeiro; Ronnie C O Alves; Leorges M Fonseca; Sérgio V A Campos
Journal:  BioData Min       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 2.522

3.  Adulteration Detection of Edible Bird's Nests Using Rapid Spectroscopic Techniques Coupled with Multi-Class Discriminant Analysis.

Authors:  Jing Sheng Ng; Syahidah Akmal Muhammad; Chin Hong Yong; Ainolsyakira Mohd Rodhi; Baharudin Ibrahim; Mohd Noor Hidayat Adenan; Salmah Moosa; Zainon Othman; Nazaratul Ashifa Abdullah Salim; Zawiyah Sharif; Faridah Ismail; Simon D Kelly; Andrew Cannavan
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-08-10

Review 4.  The Combination of Vibrational Spectroscopy and Chemometrics for Analysis of Milk Products Adulteration.

Authors:  Anjar Windarsih; Abdul Rohman; Sugeng Riyanto
Journal:  Int J Food Sci       Date:  2021-06-29

5.  Non-targeted NIR spectroscopy and SIMCA classification for commercial milk powder authentication: A study using eleven potential adulterants.

Authors:  Sanjeewa R Karunathilaka; Betsy Jean Yakes; Keqin He; Jin Kyu Chung; Magdi Mossoba
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2018-09-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.