Literature DB >> 28407872

Further investigation of distinct components of Stroop interference and of their reduction by short response-stimulus intervals.

Maria Augustinova1, Laetitia Silvert2, Nicolas Spatola2, Ludovic Ferrand3.   

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to extend the so-called semantic Stroop paradigm (Neely & Kahan, 2001) - which already successfully distinguishes between the contribution of the semantic vs. response conflict to Stroop interference - so that it can take account of and capture the separate contribution of task conflict. In line with this idea, the Stroop interference observed using the aforementioned paradigm with both short and long RSIs (500 vs. 2000ms) did indeed reflect the specific contribution of the task, semantic and response conflicts. However, the contribution of task conflict (as opposed to the semantic and response conflicts) failed to reach significance when the semantic Stroop paradigm was administered with manual (Experiment 1) as opposed to vocal responses (Experiment 2). These experiments further tested the extent to which the specific contribution of the different conflicts can be influenced by the increased cognitive control induced by a short (vs. long) RSI. The corresponding empirical evidence runs contrary to the assumption that the reduction of overall Stroop interference by a short (vs. long) RSI is due to the reduced contribution of the task (Parris, 2014) and/or semantic (De Jong, Berendsen, & Cools, 1999) conflicts. Indeed, in neither experiment was the contribution of these conflicts reduced by a short RSI. In both experiments, this manipulation only reduced the contribution of the response conflict to the overall Stroop interference (e.g., Augustinova & Ferrand, 2014b). Thus these different results clearly indicate that Stroop interference is a composite phenomenon involving both automatic and controlled processes. The somewhat obvious conclusion of this paper is that these processes are more successfully integrated within multi-stage accounts than within the historically favored single-stage response competition accounts that still dominate current psychological research and practice.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Response conflict; Response-stimulus interval duration; Semantic conflict; Stroop interference; Task conflict

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28407872     DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  7 in total

1.  Neutral stimuli and pupillometric task conflict.

Authors:  Ronen Hershman; Yulia Levin; Joseph Tzelgov; Avishai Henik
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-03-13

2.  Some further clarifications on age-related differences in Stroop interference.

Authors:  Maria Augustinova; David Clarys; Nicolas Spatola; Ludovic Ferrand
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-04

Review 3.  The loci of Stroop effects: a critical review of methods and evidence for levels of processing contributing to color-word Stroop effects and the implications for the loci of attentional selection.

Authors:  Benjamin A Parris; Nabil Hasshim; Michael Wadsley; Maria Augustinova; Ludovic Ferrand
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-08-13

4.  Different types of semantic interference, same lapses of attention: Evidence from Stroop tasks.

Authors:  Michele Scaltritti; Remo Job; Simone Sulpizio
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-01-17

5.  The Loci of Stroop Interference and Facilitation Effects With Manual and Vocal Responses.

Authors:  Maria Augustinova; Benjamin A Parris; Ludovic Ferrand
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-08-19

6.  Editorial: The Locus of the Stroop Effect.

Authors:  Benjamin A Parris; Maria Augustinova; Ludovic Ferrand
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-12-17

7.  Cognitive load affects early processes involved in mentalizing robot behaviour.

Authors:  Nicolas Spatola; Serena Marchesi; Agnieszka Wykowska
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 4.996

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.