Literature DB >> 28407527

Top-down control over feedback processing: The probability of valid feedback affects feedback-related brain activity.

Benjamin Ernst1, Marco Steinhauser2.   

Abstract

Adaptive decision-making requires that feedback about decision outcomes is adequately processed. Recent studies have shown that fronto-central event-related potentials (ERPs) are sensitive to feedback valence and can be used as an index of feedback processing. The present study investigated whether the processes involved in feedback evaluation are affected by top-down mechanisms driven by knowledge about feedback validity. In a simple decision task, participants had to make use of feedback to learn which one of two stimuli was associated with a reward in a later test phase. Feedback stimuli were followed by a cue indicating whether feedback was valid or invalid. Prior to each block, participants were informed about the frequency of valid feedback in this block. An effect of feedback validity was obtained not only for learning but also for fronto-central ERPs. While high-validity feedback was associated with a fronto-central valence effect, this effect was absent for low-validity feedback. This indicates that processes involved in feedback evaluation are affected by prior knowledge about feedback validity via top-down processes.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Decision-making; Feedback validity; Feedback-related negativity; Top-down control

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28407527     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2017.03.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  3 in total

1.  Electrophysiological measures reveal the role of anterior cingulate cortex in learning from unreliable feedback.

Authors:  Peng Li; Weiwei Peng; Hong Li; Clay B Holroyd
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Effects of feedback reliability on feedback-related brain activity: A feedback valuation account.

Authors:  Benjamin Ernst; Marco Steinhauser
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Brain Dynamics of Action Monitoring in Higher-Order Motor Control Disorders: The Case of Apraxia.

Authors:  Giuseppe Spinelli; Rachele Pezzetta; Loredana Canzano; Emmanuele Tidoni; Salvatore Maria Aglioti
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2022-03-03
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.