Literature DB >> 28407474

The impact of low and no-caloric sweeteners on glucose absorption, incretin secretion, and glucose tolerance.

Catherine B Chan1,2,3, Zohre Hashemi1, Fatheema B Subhan1.   

Abstract

The consumption of non-nutritive, low, or no-calorie sweeteners (LCS) is increasing globally. Previously thought to be physiologically inert, there is a growing body of evidence that LCS not only provide a sweet taste but may also elicit metabolic effects in the gastrointestinal tract. This review provides a brief overview of the chemical and receptor-binding properties and effects on chemosensation of different LCS but focuses on the extent to which LCS stimulates glucose transport, incretin and insulin secretion, and effects on glucose tolerance. Aspartame and sucralose both bind to a similar region of the sweet receptor. For sucralose, the data are contradictory regarding effects on glucose tolerance in humans and may depend on the food or beverage matrix and the duration of administration, as suggested by longer term rodent studies. For aspartame, there are fewer data. On the other hand, acesulfame-potassium (Ace-K) and saccharin have similar binding characteristics to each other but, while Ace-K may increase incretin secretion and glucose responses in humans, there are no data on saccharin except in rats, which show impaired glucose tolerance after chronic administration. Additional research, particularly of the effects of chronic consumption, is needed to provide concrete evidence for beneficial or detrimental effects of LCS on blood glucose regulation in humans.

Entities:  

Keywords:  glucagon-like peptide-1; glucose tolerance; glucose transport; incretin; incrétine; low-calorie sweetener; non-nutritive sweetener; tolérance au glucose; transport du glucose; édulcorant hypocalorique; édulcorant non nutritif

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28407474     DOI: 10.1139/apnm-2016-0705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab        ISSN: 1715-5312            Impact factor:   2.665


  9 in total

1.  Short-Term Consumption of Sucralose with, but Not without, Carbohydrate Impairs Neural and Metabolic Sensitivity to Sugar in Humans.

Authors:  Jelle R Dalenberg; Barkha P Patel; Raphael Denis; Maria G Veldhuizen; Yuko Nakamura; Petra C Vinke; Serge Luquet; Dana M Small
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 27.287

2.  The timing of ingestion may influence the effect of nonnutritive sweeteners on cardiometabolic health: a potentially overlooked factor.

Authors:  Kei Nakajima; Taizo Iwane; Ryoko Higuchi
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  Emerging Concepts in Brain Glucose Metabolic Functions: From Glucose Sensing to How the Sweet Taste of Glucose Regulates Its Own Metabolism in Astrocytes and Neurons.

Authors:  Menizibeya O Welcome; Nikos E Mastorakis
Journal:  Neuromolecular Med       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 3.843

Review 4.  Ultra-processed Foods and Cardiovascular Diseases: Potential Mechanisms of Action.

Authors:  Filippa Juul; Georgeta Vaidean; Niyati Parekh
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 8.701

Review 5.  Sucralose and Cardiometabolic Health: Current Understanding from Receptors to Clinical Investigations.

Authors:  Sydney Risdon; Sylvain Battault; Alonso Romo-Romo; Matthieu Roustit; Loic Briand; Grégory Meyer; Paloma Almeda-Valdes; Guillaume Walther
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 8.701

6.  Mental stress and physical activity interact with the genetic risk scores of the genetic variants related to sweetness preference in high sucrose-containing food and glucose tolerance.

Authors:  Sunmin Park; Meiling Liu; Mi Young Song
Journal:  Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 2.863

7.  Moderate intake of aspartame and sucralose with meals, but not fructose, does not exacerbate energy and glucose metabolism in estrogen-deficient rats.

Authors:  Jin Ah Ryuk; Suna Kang; James W Daily; Byoung-Seob Ko; Sunmin Park
Journal:  J Clin Biochem Nutr       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 3.114

8.  Is a Non-Caloric Sweetener-Free Diet Good to Treat Functional Gastrointestinal Disorder Symptoms? A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Viridiana Montsserrat Mendoza-Martínez; Mónica Rocío Zavala-Solares; Aranza Jhosadara Espinosa-Flores; Karen Lorena León-Barrera; Raúl Alcántara-Suárez; José Damián Carrillo-Ruíz; Galileo Escobedo; Ernesto Roldan-Valadez; Marcela Esquivel-Velázquez; Guillermo Meléndez-Mier; Nallely Bueno-Hernández
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 9.  Neuroendocrine and Metabolic Effects of Low-Calorie and Non-Calorie Sweeteners.

Authors:  Eleonora Moriconi; Alessandra Feraco; Vincenzo Marzolla; Marco Infante; Mauro Lombardo; Andrea Fabbri; Massimiliano Caprio
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 5.555

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.