| Literature DB >> 28406978 |
Takuma Yoshinaga1, Hiroto Nishimata2, Yoriko Kajiya3, Shunichi Yokoyama4.
Abstract
A relationship between Alzheimer's disease (AD) and folate has been reported. Amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) is currently one of the most reliable biomarkers for AD. We investigated the correlation between serum folate levels and amyloid imaging to clarify whether serum folate could be a biomarker for AD. We also examined the usefulness of a combined assessment of serum folate levels and red blood cell hemoglobin content. Apolipoprotein E (APOE) gene polymorphisms were also assessed. Serum folate levels and hemoglobin content were evaluated by receiver operating characteristic analysis for their diagnostic capability as AD biomarkers relating to brain amyloid β accumulation. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for serum folate was 0.136 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.000-0.312; p = 0.016). The AUC for hemoglobin content was 0.848 (95% CI: 0.661-1.000; p = 0.021). Therefore, the folate deficiency with low folate levels or the non-anaemia with high hemoglobin content levels were found to have a high probability of also testing positive for amyloid. Furthermore, eight patients were found to be folate deficiency and non-anaemia, those who were consist of 7 amyloid positive patients (87.5%), and only one of the amyloid negative patients (12.5%). These results suggest that a deficiency of serum folate and high hemoglobin levels may reflect an increased risk of amyloid β accumulation in the brain. Additionally, we demonstrated that these biomarkers could enhance the effectiveness of APOE as an AD biomarker. This study reveals that the combined assessment of serum folate levels and red blood cell hemoglobin content may be a useful biomarker for amyloid β accumulation in the brain. We also found that the combination of serum folate levels and hemoglobin content is a more specific and sensitive blood biomarker for AD than APOE or folate alone. These findings may be used to support clinical diagnosis of AD using a simple blood test.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28406978 PMCID: PMC5391131 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175854
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Patient profiles.
| Amyloid PET | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | Negative | Total | ||
| Gender | Male/ Female | 5/6 | 2/4 | 7/10 |
| Diagnosis | AD | 7/4 | 3/3 | 10/7 |
| Age | Mean ± SD | 75.4 ± 4.5 | 80.2 ± 8.7 | 77.1 ± 6.5 |
| MMSE | Mean ± SD | 22.6 ± 2.5 | 24.3 ± 3.6 | 23.2 ± 2.9 |
| Folate level | Mean ± SD | 6.2 ± 3.6 | 10.7 ± 5.3 | 7.8 ± 4.6 |
| Hemoglobin content | Mean ± SD | 13.6 ± 1.5 | 11.4 ± 1.8 | 12.8 ± 1.9 |
| APOE | Epsilon 4/ | 8/3 | 1/5 | 9/8 |
a PET, positron emission tomography;
b AD, Alzheimer's disease;
c MCI, mild cognitive impairment;
d SD, standard deviation;
e MMSE, Mini Mental State Examination;
f APOE, apolipoprotein E
Fig 1ROC curve of serum folate levels.
An ROC curve was constructed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of serum folate levels in differentiating between amyloid positive patients and amyloid negative patients. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for serum folate was 0.136 [95% CI: 0.000–0.312] (p = 0.016).
Fig 2ROC curve of hemoglobin content.
A ROC curve was constructed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of hemoglobin content in differentiating between amyloid positive patients and amyloid negative patients. The AUC for hemoglobin content was 0.848 [95% CI: 0.661–1.000] (p = 0.021).
Amyloid PET results of groups defined according to folate state and anaemia state.
| Amyloid PET positive patients | Amyloid PET negative patients | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Folate deficiency | 7 | 1 | 8 |
| Folate deficiency | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| The other cases | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Total | 11 | 6 | 17 |
Fig 3Prevalence of the APOE-epsilon 4 allele in amyloid positive and amyloid negative patients.
Eight of the 11 (72.7%) amyloid positive patients also carried the APOE-epsilon 4 allele, with it occurring in only one of the six (16.7%) amyloid negative patients. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (p = 0.027).
Amyloid PET results of groups defined according to APOE-epsilon 4 appearance, serum folate levels and hemoglobin content.
| Amyloid PET positive patients | Amyloid PET negative patients | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| APOE-epsilon 4 carriers plus α group | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| APOE-epsilon 4 non-carriers plus α group | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Equivocal group | 6 | 4 | 10 |
| Total | 11 | 6 | 17 |
a APOE-epsilon 4 carriers plus α group, APOE-epsilon 4 carriers with folate deficiency and non-anaemia;
b APOE-epsilon 4 non-carriers plus α group, APOE-epsilon 4 non-carriers with non-folate deficiency and anaemia;
c Equivocal group, All other cases