Literature DB >> 28406364

Fume emissions from a low-cost 3-D printer with various filaments.

Evan L Floyd1, Jun Wang1, James L Regens1.   

Abstract

3-D printing is an additive manufacturing process involving the injection of melted thermoplastic polymers, which are then laid down in layers to achieve a pre-designed shape. The heated deposition process raises concerns of potential aerosol and volatile organic compounds (VOC) emission and exposure. The decreasing cost of desktop 3-D printers has made the use of 3-D printers more acceptable in non-industrial workplaces lacking sufficient ventilation. Meanwhile, little is known about the characteristics of 3-D printing fume emission. The objective of this study was to characterize aerosols and VOC emissions generated from various filaments used with a low-cost 3-D printer in an environmental testing chamber. A pre-designed object was printed in 1.25 hours using eight types of filaments. A scanning mobility particle sizer and an aerodynamic particle sizer were employed to measure the particle size distribution in sub-half-micron fraction (<0.5 µm) and super-half-micron fraction (0.5-20 µm), respectively. VOC concentration was monitored real-time by a photoionization detector and sampled with a tri-sorbent thermal desorption tube, and analyzed by thermal desorption gas chromatography mass spectrometry (TD-GC/MS). Results showed high levels of fume particles emission rate (1.0 × 107 to 1.2 × 1010 #/min) in the sub-half-micron range with mode sizes of 41-83 nm. Particle concentrations peaked during the heat-up and solid layer printing periods. Total VOC concentration in the chamber followed a first-order buildup, with predominant VOC species in the chamber were breakdown and reaction products of the filaments, such as styrene from ABS filaments. These findings and exposure scenario estimation suggest that although the VOC concentrations were much lower than occupational exposure limits, particles with size less than micron might be a concern for users of low-cost 3-D printers due to high respirablity, especially if used in settings without proper guidance and engineering control.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3-D printer; aerosols; volatile organic compounds

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28406364     DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2017.1302587

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg        ISSN: 1545-9624            Impact factor:   2.155


  19 in total

1.  Particle and organic vapor emissions from children's 3-D pen and 3-D printer toys.

Authors:  Jinghai Yi; Matthew G Duling; Lauren N Bowers; Alycia K Knepp; Ryan F LeBouf; Timothy R Nurkiewicz; Anand Ranpara; Todd Luxton; Stephen B Martin; Dru A Burns; Derek M Peloquin; Eric J Baumann; M Abbas Virji; Aleksandr B Stefaniak
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 2.724

2.  Comparative analysis of ventilation efficiency on ultrafine particle removal in university MakerSpaces.

Authors:  Lynn E Secondo; Hayat I Adawi; John Cuddehe; Kenneth Hopson; Allison Schumacher; Larry Mendoza; Charles Cartin; Nastassja A Lewinski
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 4.798

3.  Particle emissions from fused deposition modeling 3D printers: Evaluation and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Peter Byrley; Barbara Jane George; William K Boyes; Kim Rogers
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Particle and vapor emissions from vat polymerization desktop-scale 3-dimensional printers.

Authors:  A B Stefaniak; L N Bowers; A K Knepp; T P Luxton; D M Peloquin; E J Baumann; J E Ham; J R Wells; A R Johnson; R F LeBouf; F-C Su; S B Martin; M A Virji
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 2.155

5.  VOC Emissions and Formation Mechanisms from Carbon Nanotube Composites during 3D Printing.

Authors:  Phillip M Potter; Souhail R Al-Abed; Dean Lay; Slawomir M Lomnicki
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 6.  Human exposure to metals in consumer-focused fused filament fabrication (FFF)/ 3D printing processes.

Authors:  Getachew Tedla; Annie M Jarabek; Peter Byrley; William Boyes; Kim Rogers
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2021-12-25       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  3D Printer Particle Emissions: Translation to Internal Dose in Adults and Children.

Authors:  Peter Byrley; William K Boyes; Kim Rogers; Annie M Jarabek
Journal:  J Aerosol Sci       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 4.586

8.  Use of 3-Dimensional Printers in Educational Settings: The Need for Awareness of the Effects of Printer Temperature and Filament Type on Contaminant Releases.

Authors:  Aleksandr B Stefaniak; Lauren N Bowers; Gabe Cottrell; Ergin Erdem; Alycia K Knepp; Stephen Martin; Jack Pretty; Matthew G Duling; Elizabeth D Arnold; Zachary Wilson; Benjamin Krider; Ryan F LeBouf; M Abbas Virji; Arif Sirinterlikci
Journal:  J Chem Health Saf       Date:  2021-08-31

9.  Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) and polycarbonate (PC) filaments three-dimensional (3-D) printer emissions-induced cell toxicity.

Authors:  Mariana T Farcas; Aleksandr B Stefaniak; Alycia K Knepp; Lauren Bowers; William K Mandler; Michael Kashon; Stephen R Jackson; Todd A Stueckle; Jenifer D Sisler; Sherri A Friend; Chaolong Qi; Duane R Hammond; Treye A Thomas; Joanna Matheson; Vincent Castranova; Yong Qian
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 4.372

10.  Evaluation of emissions and exposures at workplaces using desktop 3-dimensional printer.

Authors:  A B Stefaniak; A R Johnson; S du Preez; D R Hammond; J R Wells; J E Ham; R F LeBouf; K W Menchaca; S B Martin; M G Duling; L N Bowers; A K Knepp; F C Su; D J de Beer; J L du Plessis
Journal:  J Chem Health Saf       Date:  2019-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.