| Literature DB >> 28406142 |
S Ghannadzadeh1,2,3, S Licciardello1,2, S Arsenijević1,2,4, P Robinson1,2, H Takatsu5,6, M I Katsnelson2, N E Hussey1,2.
Abstract
In many layered metals, coherent propagation of electronic excitations is often confined to the highly conducting planes. While strong electron correlations and/or proximity to an ordered phase are believed to be the drivers of this electron confinement, it is still not known what triggers the loss of interlayer coherence in a number of layered systems with strong magnetic fluctuations, such as cuprates. Here, we show that a definitive signature of interlayer coherence in the metallic-layered triangular antiferromagnet PdCrO2 vanishes at the Néel transition temperature. Comparison with the relevant energy scales and with the isostructural non-magnetic PdCoO2 reveals that the interlayer incoherence is driven by the growth of short-range magnetic fluctuations. This establishes a connection between long-range order and interlayer coherence in PdCrO2 and suggests that in many other low-dimensional conductors, incoherent interlayer transport also arises from the strong interaction between the (tunnelling) electrons and fluctuations of some underlying order.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28406142 PMCID: PMC5399288 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Figure 1Magnetic ordering in PdCrO2.
(a) Crystal structure of PdCrO2, with lattice parameters a=b=2.930 Å and c=18.087 Å (ref. 7). The green, blue and red spheres represent the Pd, O and Cr atoms, respectively. The red-shaded planes represent the sides of the edge-shared CrO6 octahedra. (b) One of the possible solutions for magnetic structure of the antiferromagnetically ordered phase below TN=37.5 K, showing a non-coplanar spin structure9. The arrows represent the Cr spins, with arrows of the same color representing spins in the same spin sublattice group (see ref. 9 for details). For clarity only the Cr atoms are shown. (c) The temperature dependence of the interlayer c-axis resistivity ρc, which shows a sub-linear temperature dependence in the paramagnetic regime with a sharp cusp at TN, resulting in a ρc(T) that rises faster than T2 in the FS reconstructed phase. Inset: The derivative dρc/dT of the same resistivity curve, highlighting the sharp peak at the transition temperature. The shaded and unshaded regions indicate the coherent and incoherent regimes, respectively. Crystallographic drawings produced using VESTA37.
Figure 2ADMR at high fields.
(a) Schematic diagram of the four-contact setup used to measure c-axis resistivity, showing the definition of the polar (θ) and azimuthal (φ) angles. (b) Evolution of ρc during a polar rotation at 15 T (red line) and 30 T (blue line), at 4.2 K. The direction of the applied field at 0° and 90° are given. The top right inset shows tan θ for the peaks indicated by the arrows, forming a straight line as expected for Yamaji oscillations. Fits (dashed line in the inset) to this give kf=0.57(3) Å−1, consistent with that found for the γ orbits from quantum oscillation measurements13. The left inset is a schematic showing the coherent FS orbits that are formed when the field is applied parallel to the crystal planes. (c,d) The reduction in the amplitude of the c-axis coherence peak at θ=90° as a function of temperature for PdCrO2 (μ0H=30 T) and for its non-magnetic isostructural analogue PdCoO2 (μ0H=35 T)28. For clarity, the PdCrO2 data is plotted as δρc=ρc(θ)−ρc(θ=0). The 4.2 K data for PdCrO2 have been scaled by 0.43. The PdCoO2 data are reproduced with kind permission from Kikugawa et al.28
Figure 3Loss of electronic coherence at TN.
(a) Evolution of dρK/dθ as a function of the polar angle for a range of temperatures above and below TN. The 4.2 K curve is scaled by 0.03. (b) |d2ρK/dθ2| at θ=90°, showing the reduction in the sharpness of the coherence peak as temperature is increased. The shaded and unshaded backgrounds indicate the coherent and incoherent regimes, respectively. The temperature error bar is given by the temperature drift during the rotation, while the |d2ρK/dθ2| error bar is given by the maximum uncertainty introduced in the peak amplitude due to the necessary smoothing of the dρK/dθ curve. The error bars are not shown if they are smaller than the data points. In both figures the broad sinusoidal background was subtracted prior to differentiation, as described in the Supplementary Note 2. Inset: representation of a 3D FS in the coherent regime (c), and a Fermi surface that is only defined in two-dimensions in the incoherent regime (d).