| Literature DB >> 28405943 |
Bereketeab Haileselassie1,2, Erik Su3, Iraklis Pozios4, Diego F Niño5, Hongyun Liu4, Dai-Yin Lu4, Ioannis Ventoulis4, William B Fulton5, Chhinder P Sodhi5, David Hackam5, Brian O'Rourke4, Theodore Abraham4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recognition of cardiomyopathy in sepsis can be challenging due to the limitations of conventional measures such as ejection fraction (EF) and fractional shortening (FS) in the context of variable preload and afterload conditions. This study correlates myocardial function using strain echocardiography (SE) with cardiomyocyte oxidative stress in a murine model of sepsis.Entities:
Keywords: Sepsis; Sepsis-induced myocardial dysfunction; Shock; Ultrasound
Year: 2017 PMID: 28405943 PMCID: PMC5389950 DOI: 10.1186/s40635-017-0134-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Intensive Care Med Exp ISSN: 2197-425X
Fig. 1Strain analysis by echocardiogram post-processing software (VevoStrain, FUJIFILM VisualSonics Inc.). The parasternal long access view (a) was used to calculate the longitudinal strain (LS, %) (b) and the longitudinal strain rate (LSR, 1/sec). The parasternal short axis view (c) was used to calculate the circumferential strain (CS, %) (d) and circumferential strain rate (CSR, 1/sec)
Baseline characteristics and echocardiographic metrics for C57BL/6J mice
| Variable | CLP (33) | Sham (25) | Control (10) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weight (g) | 22.42 ± 2.7 | 21.66 ± 3.31 | 20.5 ± 2.1 | 0.44 |
| HR (bpm) | 436 ± 65 | 431 ± 73 | 444 ± 62 | 0.87 |
| 2D Echo | ||||
| EF (%) | 0.59 ± 0.1 | 0.59 ± 0.09 | 0.62 ± 0.09 | 0.57 |
| Doppler | ||||
| E/A | 1.6 ± 0.23 | 1.57 ± 0.18 | 1.57 ± 0.23 | 0.71 |
| E/e’ | 25.2 ± 7.3 | 24.8 ± 5.0 | 27.3 ± 7.9 | 0.56 |
| Strain | ||||
| CS (%) | −28.04 ± 5.74 | −27.44 ± 5.7 | −26.9 ± 4.4 | 0.87 |
| CSR (%) | −11.45 ± 3.8 | −10.5 ± 2.4 | −9.6 ± 2.2 | 0.54 |
| LS (%) | −21.3 ± 4.31 | −22.23 ± 4.31 | −23.43 ± 6.02 | 0.67 |
| LSR (%) | −7.45 ± 1.9 | −8.97 ± 2.96 | −9.98 ± 4.7 | 0.04 |
CLP indicates cecal ligation and puncture, CS global circumferential strain, CSR peak systolic circumferential strain rate, E/A ratio of peak flow velocity across the mitral annulus during early and late diastole, 2D Echo conventional echocardiography, E/e’ ratio between mitral inflow and mitral annular excursion velocity during early diastole, EF ejection fraction, LS global longitudinal strain, LSR peak systolic longitudinal strain rate, Strain strain echocardiography
Fig. 2The temporal progression of heart rate, ejection fraction (EF), circumferential (CS), and longitudinal strain (LS) in C57BL/6J mice randomized to sham, control, and cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) groups. a Demonstrates an overall increase in heart rate overtime with no significant difference between the three groups. b and c Demonstrate notable depression in longitudinal strain (LS) in the CLP group at 24 and 48 h without change in the EF
Echocardiographic metrics at 24 and 48 h post-CLP for C57BL/6J mice
| Parameter | CLP | Sham | Control |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 h post-CLP | ||||
| HR (bpm) | 453 ± 65 | 463 ± 58 | 465 ± 46 | 0.77 |
| 2D Echo | ||||
| EF (%) | 0.58 ± 0.11 | 0.57 ± 0.07 | 0.61 ± 0.08 | 0.68 |
| E/A | 1.45 ± 0.44 | 1.49 ± 0.23 | 1.49 ± 0.22 | 0.88 |
| E/e’ | 19.1 ± 8.44 | 20.83 ± 6.65 | 22.9 ± 4.73 | 0.34 |
| Strain | ||||
| CS (%) | −22.3 ± 5.7 | −23.4 ± 10.75 | −25.14 ± 3.18 | 0.26 |
| CSR (%) | −9.6 ± 3.48 | −12.14 ± 6.21 | −10.69 ± 3.27 | 0.54 |
| LS (%) | −16.6 ± 4.12 | −21.01 ± 5.4 | −22.5 ± 3.9 | <0.01** |
| LSR (%) | −7.08 ± 2.52 | −7.84 ± 2.23 | −9.01 ± 2.36 | 0.08 |
| 48 h post-CLP | ||||
| HR (bpm) | 455 ± 79 | 474 ± 39 | 464 ± 38 | 0.74 |
| 2D Echo | ||||
| EF (%) | 0.55 ± 0.12 | 0.6 ± 0.09 | 0.66 ± 0.05 | 0.08 |
| E/A | 1.5 ± 0.12 | 1.49 ± 0.11 | 1.63 ± 0.32 | 0.73 |
| E/e’ | 23.6 ± 8.04 | 20.7 ± 6.01 | 22.27 ± 7.15 | 0.7 |
| Strain | ||||
| CS (%) | −24.4 ± 6.9 | −26.3 ± 5.2 | −28.3 ± 6.9 | 0.44 |
| CSR (%) | −10.75 ± 3.38 | −11.3 ± 3.29 | −12.44 ± 2.56 | 0.55 |
| LS (%) | −17.25 ± 4.72 | −22.2 ± 5.8 | −24.62 ± 7.12 | 0.04** |
| LSR (%) | −6.8 ± 2.31 | −9.52 ± 2.31 | −9.54 ± 2.41 | 0.036** |
CLP indicates cecal ligation and puncture, CS global circumferential strain, CSR peak systolic circumferential strain rate, E/A, ratio of peak flow velocity across the mitral annulus during early and late diastole, 2D Echo conventional echocardiography, E/e’ ratio between mitral inflow and mitral annular excursion velocity during early diastole, EF ejection fraction, LS, global longitudinal strain, LSR peak systolic longitudinal strain rate Strain strain echocardiography. **CLP group is significantly different versus sham and control groups
Fig. 3Quantitative real-time PCR of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1, and Il-6) and mitochondrial free radical scavengers (SOD-2, GPX-2, Catalase) at 24 and 48 h following CLP. Significant increase in TNF-α, IL-1, and Il-6 is seen at 24 and 48 h in the CLP group when compared to sham and control (a–c). Significant decrease in mitochondrial ROS scavengers is seen at 24 and 48 h post-surgery in the CLP group when compared to sham and control (d–f)
Fig. 4Photomicrographs of heart sections stained with dihydroethidium (DHE) in red and DAPI in blue (merged images) from septic MCAT +/+ (a, b, c) and WT mice (d, e, f). Significant increase in level of oxidative stress (signified by increased uptake of DHE) in the WT mice at 24 (e) and 48 h (f) following CLP. Minimal signs of oxidative stress are seen the MCAT +/+ mice following CLP
Association between 24 h echocardiographic metrics and mortality for C57BL/6J mice
| Parameter | OR |
| CI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heart rate | 0.99 | 0.85 | 0.98–1.02 |
| Ejection fraction | 1.06 | 0.179 | 0.02–1.8 |
| E/A | 0.4 | 0.35 | 0.06–2.72 |
| E/e’ | 1.07 | 0.17 | 0.97–1.20 |
| LS | 1.23 | 0.04* | 1.01–1.51 |
| CS | 1.14 | 0.05* | 1.02–1.32 |
| LSR | 1.49 | 0.108 | 0.92–2.42 |
| CSR | 1.12 | 0.285 | 0.91–1.38 |
CI indicates confidence interval, CS, global circumferential strain, CSR peak systolic circumferential strain rate, E/A ratio of peak flow velocity across the mitral annulus during early and late diastole, E/e’ ratio between mitral inflow and mitral annular excursion velocity during early diastole, LS global longitudinal strain, LSR peak systolic longitudinal strain rate, OR odds ratio. *Significant association with mortality based on univariate logistic regression analysis
MCAT and Wildtype Mice Echocardiographic Metrics at 24 and 48 h post-CLP
| CLP (WT) | CLP (MCAT) | Sham (WT) | Sham |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 h post-CLP | |||||
| HR (bpm) | 451 ± 69 | 405 ± 71 | 426 ± 78 | 454 ± 79 | 0.64 |
| 2D Echo | |||||
| EF (%) | 58.3 ± 15.5 | 61 ± 10.6 | 61 ± 8 | 52.1 ± 8 | 0.17 |
| E/A | 1.34 ± 0.61 | 1.43 ± 0.18 | 1.49 ± 0.22 | 1.37 ± 0.19 | 0.85 |
| E/e’ | 16.19 ± 6.9 | 27.9 ± 6.95 | 22.9 ± 4.73 | 20.1 ± 4.06 | 0.01 |
| Strain | |||||
| CS (%) | −20.9 ± 7.3 | −26.4 ± 8.8 | −25.14 ± 3.18 | −27.5 ± 4.7 | 0.1 |
| CSR (%) | −10.32 ± 4.4 | −11.67 ± 7.19 | −10.69 ± 3.27 | −10.2 ± 1.52 | 0.76 |
| LS (%) | −15.4 ± 4.1 | −21.5 ± 4.9 | −22.5 ± 3.9 | −22.2 ± 2.8 | 0.01 |
| LSR (%) | −6.9 ± 3.75 | −8.9 ± 1.8 | −9.01 ± 2.36 | −10.33 ± 3.74 | 0.01 |
| 48 h post-CLP | |||||
| HR (bpm) | 420 ± 74 | 408 ± 58 | 466 ± 73 | 440 ± 34 | 0.71 |
| 2D Echo | |||||
| EF (%) | 55.2 ± 1.06 | 66 ± 9.7 | 0.61 ± 0.08 | 61.6 ± 6.98 | 0.14 |
| E/A | 1.49 ± 0.14 | 1.44 ± 0.08 | 1.49 ± 0.22 | 1.42 ± 0.15 | 0.65 |
| E/e’ | 32.41 ± 7.25 | 23.41 ± 7.25 | 22.9 ± 4.73 | 27.15 ± 7.44 | 0.22 |
| Strain | |||||
| CS (%) | −20.6 ± 7.5 | −29.4 ± 4.7 | −25.14 ± 3.18 | −31.7 ± 3.5 | 0.01 |
| CSR (%) | −8.87 ± 3.02 | −13.6 ± 3.07 | −10.69 ± 3.27 | −12.1 ± 1.58 | 0.02 |
| LS (%) | −16.5 ± 3.9 | −21.6 ± 4.8 | −22.5 ± 3.9 | −24.15 ± 7.7 | 0.01 |
| LSR (%) | −9.06 ± 3.86 | −10.79 ± 2.71 | −9.01 ± 2.36 | −6.69 ± 1.73 | 0.5 |
CLP indicates cecal ligation and puncture, CS global circumferential strain, CSR peak systolic circumferential strain rate, E/A ratio of peak flow velocity across the mitral annulus during early and late diastole, 2D Echo conventional echocardiography, E/e’ ratio between mitral inflow and mitral annular excursion velocity during early diastole, EF ejection fraction, LS global longitudinal strain, LSR peak systolic longitudinal strain rate, Strain strain echocardiography