Literature DB >> 28405738

Evaluation of miR-506 and miR-4316 expression in early and non-invasive diagnosis of colorectal cancer.

Paweł Krawczyk1, Tomasz Powrózek2, Tomasz Olesiński3, Adam Dmitruk3, Joanna Dziwota2, Dariusz Kowalski4, Janusz Milanowski2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Examination of the entire colon by colonoscopy remains the golden standard for screening of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, patients are reluctant to perform invasive colonoscopies because of interference with their intimacy. Therefore, the potential use of non-invasive analysis of microRNAs expression in liquid biopsy as a novel biomarker for early CRC has investigated in several studies. In this study, we analyzed the expression of two novel microRNAs: miR-506 and miR-4316, which have never been examined in CRC.
METHODS: Plasma samples were collected from 56 patients (median age of 68 years) with operable colorectal cancer and from 70 healthy individuals (median age of 59 years). Expression of plasma microRNAs was evaluated by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction using Eco real-time PCR device (Illumina, USA).
RESULTS: We found a significant elevated expression of both examined microRNAs in early CRC patients when compared to those in healthy individuals (p = 0.0054 for miR-506 and p = 0.0025 for miR-4316). The expression of miR-506 and miR-4316 did not depend on gender, age, disease stage, and tumor localization of CRC patients. ROC curve analysis showed that both examined microRNAs could differentiate early stage colorectal cancer from healthy individuals with 76.8% specificity and 60.7% sensitivity for miR-506 analysis and 76.8% specificity and 75% specificity for miR-4316 analysis.
CONCLUSION: Our study revealed that elevated expression of miR-506 and miR-4316 in peripheral blood were potential molecular markers for early colorectal cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal cancer; Early diagnosis and prevention; Liquid biopsy; microRNAs

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28405738      PMCID: PMC5486640          DOI: 10.1007/s00384-017-2814-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer in males and the second in females. In the developed countries, the CRC incidence and mortality have been slowly but steadily decreasing due to increased endoscopic screening and efficacy of surgical treatment. Resection of early stages CRC allows recovery almost 100% of patients. However, many patients avoid prophylactic examinations because of fears prior to colonoscopy and violation of privacy during this procedure. Therefore, it is necessary to search a low-cost, non-invasive screening method with high sensitivity and specificity to CRC detection. Determination of epigenetic events may be a useful tool for early and non-invasive (tests performed in peripheral blood) cancers detection. Gene expression regulation by aberrant DNA methylation and by microRNAs is a well-characterized event in tumor biology and is extensively described for CRC. CRC patients are the first group of cancer patients who may benefit of a epigenetic diagnostic test. Increased levels of cell-free circulating, methylated promoter region of Septin 9 gene have been reported in CRC patients. Unfortunately, the sensitivity of this test is insufficient in early stages of CRC (stage I 52%, stage II 76%, stage III 76%). Moreover, the organ specificity of the test is low. The presence of Septin 9 gene methylation in free-circulating DNA (cf-DNA) was detected in the plasma of patients with other types of cancers, e.g., lung cancer (LC) [1]. Currently, the potential use of microRNAs analysis as a novel biomarker for cancers has investigated in several studies (including measuring of microRNAs expression from disintegrated tumors cells in liquid biopsy). microRNAs are class of small, non-coding RNA molecules that regulate gene expression by inducing mRNA degradation or suppressing translation. microRNAs are usually complementary to the short nucleotide sequences in the 3’UTR (untranslated region) of one or more mRNAs. Abnormal expression of microRNAs specific for mRNA of tumor suppressor genes and oncogenes is showed in many cancer types and appears to be cell type and disease specific [2]. Here, we analyzed the expression of two novel microRNAs: miR-506 and miR-4316, which have never been investigated in CRC. miR-505 targets 3’UTRs of GATA6 gene for GATA6 transcriptional factor, YAP1 gene encoding a transcriptional co-activator, FOXQ1 oncogene, EMT (epithelial-mesenchymal transition)-related genes such as SNAI2, VIM, and CD151 as well as gene for sphingosine kinase 1 (SPHK1) thereby inhibiting Akt/NF-κB signaling [3-8]. miR-4316 targets has not been clearly identified. However, study of Goff and co-workers suggested that miR-4316 can be complementary to the 3’UTR of mRNA AGO2 gene. Argonaute (AGO1-4) proteins themselves are involved in the silencing of gene expression with the participation of microRNAs. Argonaute selects the single guide strand of the mature microRNAs to load into the RISC (RNA-induced silencing complex). This single strand microRNA acts as a template for RISC to recognize complementary mRNA transcript [8-10].

Material and methods

Our study enrolled 56 chemotherapy and radiotherapy naïve CRC patients (median age of 68 years, 37 males, 17 females) with operable colorectal cancer (42.9% in first and 57.1% in second stage of the disease). Material was obtained before application of surgical procedures. Additionally, plasma samples were collected from 70 healthy individuals (median age of 59 years, 39 males, 31 females) without gastrointestinal disorders and cancers history. Blood samples were collected into tubes covered with EDTA-K2. Samples were stored at room temperature for a few minutes and centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min. At least 2 ml of plasma were stored in cryovials at −80 °C. Total RNA including small non-coding RNAs (<100 nucleotides) was extracted from 400 μl of plasma using miRNeasy serum/plasma kit (QIAGEN, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was conducted in two steps. Firstly, miRNAs were reverse transcribed to complementary DNA (cDNA) using MicroRNA Reverse Transcription Kit with specific RT primers, which copied only selected microRNAs (Applied Biosystems, USA). Reverse transcription was performed in TPersonal Thermocycler (Biometra, Germany). In the second step, cDNA was quantified using TaqMan Universal Master Mix II with Uracil N-glycosylase (UNG) and TaqMan microRNA-specific primers with fluorescently labeled probes (Applied Biosystems, USA) in Eco real-time PCR device (Illumina, USA). microRNAs expression was normalized relative to U6 small nuclear RNA (U6 snRNA). The ΔCt, 2−ΔCt and 2−ΔΔCt, analysis was used to compare microRNAs expression between CRC patients and healthy individuals. MedCalc Software version 12 (Belgium) was used for statistical analysis. Relative expression of microRNAs between studied groups was compared using t test. Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the groups of CRC patients with different clinical characteristics as well as microRNAs expression (calculated as “high” if the expression was equal or higher than the median). For assessment of diagnostic accuracy (test sensitivity and specificity), the receiver operating curves (ROC) with area under curve (AUC) analysis were generated. p values of <0.05 were assessed as statistically significant. The study was approved by the local Ethical Committee of Medical University of Lublin (KE-0254/218/2015).

Results

We found a significant elevated expression of both examined microRNAs in CRC patients when compared to those in healthy individuals (p = 0.0054 for miR-506 and p = 0.0025 for miR-4316). These differences were independent of the CRC stage. The expression of analyzed microRNAs in patients with stage I of CRC differed significantly from healthy individuals (p = 0.0032 for miR-506 and p = 0.0005 for miR-4316). Similar differences were observed between patients in stage II of CRC and healthy individuals (p = 0.0319 for miR-506 and p = 0.0016 for miR-4316). However, expression of both microRNAs did not differ significantly between patients in stage I and II of CRC. The high expression of miR-506 was significantly more frequently observed in non-smoking CRC patients than in smoking CRC patients (p = 0.029). The expression of miR-506 and miR-4316 did not depend on gender, age, and tumor localization. ROC curve analysis showed that both microRNAs could differentiate early stage CRC from normal controls with an AUC of 0.747 for miR-506 (95% CI 0.662–0.820) and 0.744 for miR-4316 (95% CI 0.658–0.817). For miR-506 analysis, the specificity of the test was 76.8% and sensitivity was 60.7%. For miR-4316 analysis, the specificity and the sensitivity were 60.9 and 83.9%, respectively. Combination ROC analysis of both microRNAs expression revealed a litter increased AUC value of 0.751 (95% CI 0.666–0.8240) with 76.8 and 75% specificity.

Discussion

Several studies have examined microRNAs expression in CRC and confirmed that this expression is altered in CRC. This indicates that microRNAs may have more oncogenic than tumor suppressive functions in CRC [11]. In contrast to CRC, microRNAs expression are generally reduced in other types of cancers. These observations have been made in the material derived from tumor tissue compared to surrounding normal tissue [2, 11]. Therefore, microRNAs expression patterns could classify tissue and tumor types [2]. However, the examination of microRNAs expression in tumor tissue could not be used for CRC early diagnosis. Therefore, circulating microRNAs detected in liquid biopsy are being evaluated for potential marker in early CRC detection [12]. Our analysis revealed that the elevated expression of miR-506 and miR-4316 in peripheral blood met the above assumptions. These microRNAs were not previously investigated in CRC patients and in the liquid biopsy. In our previous study, we confirmed that expression of miR-506 in liquid biopsy was significantly lower in LC patients compared to healthy individuals. Moreover, expression of miR-4316 in peripheral blood was similar in LC patients and healthy persons [8]. These observations may indicate applicability of the analysis of the expression of miR-506 and miR-4316 in distinction of CRC patients from LC patients and from healthy individuals. Li et al. found that miR-506 expression was significantly lower in pancreatic cancer (PC) tissue compared to normal pancreas. High expression of miR-506 was good prognostic factor for PC patients. Authors concluded that transcriptional repression of miR-506 results in the upregulation of SPHK1, which has an important role in PC progression by regulating AKT/NF-κB pathways [7]. Zhang et al. revealed that expression of miR-506 was significantly lower in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) tissue and cell lines compared with normal nasopharyngeal specimens. miR-506 overexpression inhibited NPC cell proliferation and colony formations as well as repressed NPC cells invasion. Authors suggested that tumor suppressor role of miR-506 was mediated by FOXQ1 downregulation [5]. Breast cancer patients with high miR-506 expression in tumor tissue showed significantly longer distant relapse free survival compared to patients with low miR-506 expression. Arora et al. supposed that this phenomenon is associated with regulation by miR-506 the expression of EMT-related genes. In breast cancer cell lines, authors showed that the expression of CD151, VIM, and SNAI2 were suppressed, while CDH1 (an epithelial marker) was upregulated by miR-506 [6]. Taking into account the above facts, it is reasonable to investigate the possibility of application of miR-506 analysis in peripheral blood as a specific CRC marker. It appears that the increased miR-506 expression is characteristic for CRC, while in other types of neoplasms (lung, breast, NPC, and pancreatic cancer), the miR-506 expression could be reduced. Examination of miR-4316 expression in peripheral blood and tumor tissue of patients with different types of neoplasms requires further studies (Fig. 1.
Fig. 1

Comparison of miR-506 (a) and miR-4316 (b) expression in CRC patients and in healthy individuals. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis using examined miRNAs for discriminating colorectal tumors. AUC (the area under the ROC curve) estimation for the examination of miR-506 (c) and miR-4316 (d) as well as both miRNAs (e) in discrimination of the CRC patients from the healthy individuals

Comparison of miR-506 (a) and miR-4316 (b) expression in CRC patients and in healthy individuals. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis using examined miRNAs for discriminating colorectal tumors. AUC (the area under the ROC curve) estimation for the examination of miR-506 (c) and miR-4316 (d) as well as both miRNAs (e) in discrimination of the CRC patients from the healthy individuals
  12 in total

Review 1.  The role of microRNAs in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Aaron J Schetter; Hirokazu Okayama; Curtis C Harris
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.360

2.  MicroRNA-506 suppresses growth and metastasis of oral squamous cell carcinoma via targeting GATA6.

Authors:  Li Deng; Hui Liu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-02-15

3.  MicroRNA-506 inhibits gastric cancer proliferation and invasion by directly targeting Yap1.

Authors:  Jun Deng; Wan Lei; Xiaojun Xiang; Ling Zhang; Feng Yu; Jun Chen; Miao Feng; Jianping Xiong
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-04-07

4.  MicroRNA expression profiles classify human cancers.

Authors:  Jun Lu; Gad Getz; Eric A Miska; Ezequiel Alvarez-Saavedra; Justin Lamb; David Peck; Alejandro Sweet-Cordero; Benjamin L Ebert; Raymond H Mak; Adolfo A Ferrando; James R Downing; Tyler Jacks; H Robert Horvitz; Todd R Golub
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-06-09       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Application of plasma circulating microRNA-448, 506, 4316, and 4478 analysis for non-invasive diagnosis of lung cancer.

Authors:  Tomasz Powrózek; Paweł Krawczyk; Dariusz M Kowalski; Barbara Kuźnar-Kamińska; Kinga Winiarczyk; Marta Olszyna-Serementa; Halina Batura-Gabryel; Janusz Milanowski
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-09-04

6.  MiR-506 suppresses tumor proliferation and invasion by targeting FOXQ1 in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Zhanchi Zhang; Jun Ma; Guang Luan; Lin Kang; Yuhong Su; Yanan He; Feng Luan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Detection of miRNA as non-invasive biomarkers of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Albert Ren; Yujuan Dong; Ho Tsoi; Jun Yu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Impact of polymorphisms in microRNA biogenesis genes on colon cancer risk and microRNA expression levels: a population-based, case-control study.

Authors:  Lila E Mullany; Jennifer S Herrick; Roger K Wolff; Matthew F Buas; Martha L Slattery
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 3.063

9.  miR-506 regulates epithelial mesenchymal transition in breast cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Himanshu Arora; Rehana Qureshi; Woong-Yang Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Downregulated miR-506 expression facilitates pancreatic cancer progression and chemoresistance via SPHK1/Akt/NF-κB signaling.

Authors:  J Li; H Wu; W Li; L Yin; S Guo; X Xu; Y Ouyang; Z Zhao; S Liu; Y Tian; Z Tian; J Ju; B Ni; H Wang
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 9.867

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Methods and novel technology for microRNA quantification in colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Laura Moody; Hongshan He; Yuan-Xiang Pan; Hong Chen
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 6.551

2.  Plasma miRNA can detect colorectal cancer, but how early?

Authors:  Maria L Wikberg; Robin Myte; Richard Palmqvist; Bethany van Guelpen; Ingrid Ljuslinder
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 4.452

3.  Clinical Significance and Prognostic Value of miR-28-5p in Colon Cancer.

Authors:  Ji-Lin Li; Ke-Zhi Li; Ming-Zhi Xie; Yan-Ping Tang; Yin-Lin Tang; Bangli Hu
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.434

Review 4.  Relevance of MicroRNAs as Potential Diagnostic and Prognostic Markers in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Grzegorz Hibner; Małgorzata Kimsa-Furdzik; Tomasz Francuz
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 5.  Prognostic and Predictive Epigenetic Biomarkers in Oncology.

Authors:  Katarzyna Kamińska; Ewelina Nalejska; Marta Kubiak; Joanna Wojtysiak; Łukasz Żołna; Janusz Kowalewski; Marzena Anna Lewandowska
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.074

6.  MicroRNA-4316 inhibits gastric cancer proliferation and migration via directly targeting VEGF-A.

Authors:  Haithm Mousa; Menglang Yuan; Xinsheng Zhang; Xiaomeng Li; Abdullah Shopit; Marwan Almoiliqy; Mohammed Alshwmi; Aisha Al-Dherasi; Yue Xu; Yunfei Zuo
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 5.722

Review 7.  Biomarkers for detecting colorectal cancer non-invasively: DNA, RNA or proteins?

Authors:  Alexandre Loktionov
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2020-02-15

8.  A Circulating miRNA-Based Scoring System Established by WGCNA to Predict Colon Cancer.

Authors:  Da Qin; Rui Wei; Si Liu; Shengtao Zhu; Shutian Zhang; Li Min
Journal:  Anal Cell Pathol (Amst)       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 2.916

Review 9.  Liquid biopsy and PCR-free ultrasensitive detection systems in oncology (Review).

Authors:  Alessia Finotti; Matteo Allegretti; Jessica Gasparello; Patrizio Giacomini; Demetrios A Spandidos; Giuseppe Spoto; Roberto Gambari
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 5.650

Review 10.  Epigenetic Regulation by lncRNAs: An Overview Focused on UCA1 in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Bernadette Neve; Nicolas Jonckheere; Audrey Vincent; Isabelle Van Seuningen
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.