Literature DB >> 28405116

Oral Misoprostol Solution for Induction of Labour.

Varsha L Deshmukh1, Apurva V Rajamanya1, K A Yelikar1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of oral misoprostol solution for induction of labour. STUDY
DESIGN: This is a prospective observational study.
SETTING: This study was conducted in Government Medical College, Aurangabad.
METHOD: Patients undergoing induction of labour after 36 weeks of pregnancy were allocated by randomization to induction of labour with oral misoprostol solution administered 2 h apart. Delivery within 24 h after induction with oral misoprostol solution was the primary outcome on which the sample size was based. The data were analysed by Statistical Software for Social Sciences software. RESULT: Two hundred patients were randomly selected for induction with oral misoprostol solution. There were no significant differences in substantive outcomes. Vaginal delivery within 24 h was achieved in 80.5 % of patients. The caesarean section rate was 19.5 %. Uterine hyperactivity occurred in 4 % of patients. The response to induction of labour in women with unfavourable cervices (modified Bishop's score <2) was somewhat slower with misoprostol, induction to delivery interval was more, oxytocin requirement was more, and vaginal delivery rate was less.
CONCLUSION: This new approach to oral misoprostol solution administration was successful in achieving vaginal delivery rate in 24 h in 80.5 % of patients; rate of LSCS was less 19.5 %.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Induction of labour; Induction-delivery interval; Oral misoprostol solution

Year:  2016        PMID: 28405116      PMCID: PMC5371524          DOI: 10.1007/s13224-016-0937-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India        ISSN: 0975-6434


  17 in total

Review 1.  Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour.

Authors:  G Justus Hofmeyr; A Metin Gülmezoglu; Cynthia Pileggi
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-10-06

Review 2.  Oral misoprostol for induction of labour.

Authors:  Z Alfirevic; A Weeks
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-04-19

Review 3.  Labor induction with misoprostol.

Authors:  D A Wing
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Comparison of labor induction with misoprostol vs. oxytocin/prostaglandin E2 in term pregnancy.

Authors:  S Kadanali; T Küçüközkan; N Zor; Y Kumtepe
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.561

5.  Oral or vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor.

Authors:  M K Toppozada; M Y Anwar; H A Hassan; W S el-Gazaerly
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.561

6.  A comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour at term: a randomised trial.

Authors:  J S Kwon; G A Davies; V P Mackenzie
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.531

7.  Oral misoprostol for induction of labour at term: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Jodie M Dodd; Caroline A Crowther; Jeffrey S Robinson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-02-02

8.  A comparison of orally administered misoprostol with vaginally administered misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.

Authors:  D A Wing; D Ham; R H Paul
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Titrated oral compared with vaginal misoprostol for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Shi-Yann Cheng; Ho Ming; Jui-Chi Lee
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 10.  Labour induction with prostaglandins: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zarko Alfirevic; Edna Keeney; Therese Dowswell; Nicky J Welton; Sofia Dias; Leanne V Jones; Kate Navaratnam; Deborah M Caldwell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-02-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.