Literature DB >> 28405062

Pre and post hoc analysis of electronic health record implementation on emergency department metrics.

Kyle J Rupp1, Nathan J Ham1, Dennis E Blankenship1, Mark E Payton1, Kelly A Murray1.   

Abstract

Longitudinal time-based emergency department (ED) performance measures were quantified 12 months before and 12 months after (March 2012-February 2014) implementation of a Meditech 6.0® electronic health record (EHR) at a single urban academic ED. Data assessed were length of stay from door to door, door to admission, door to bed, bed to provider, provider to disposition, and disposition to admission, as well as number of patients leaving against medical advice and number of patients leaving without being seen. Analysis of variance was used to compare levels before and after EHR implementation for each variable, with adjustments made for the number of admissions, transfers, and month. No difference was seen in monthly volume, admissions, or transfers. Implementation of an EHR resulted in a sustained increase in ED time metrics for mean length of stay and times from door to door, door to admission, door to bed, and provider to disposition. Decreased ED time metrics were seen in bed-to-provider and disposition-to-admit times. The number of patients who left against medical advice increased after implementation, but the number of patients who left without being seen was not significantly different. Thus, EHR implementation was associated with an increase in time with most performance metrics. Although general times trended back to near preimplementation baselines, most ED time metrics remained elevated beyond the study length of 12 months. Understanding the impact of EHR system implementation on the overall performance of an ED can help departments prepare for potential adverse effects of such systems on overall efficiency.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28405062      PMCID: PMC5349808          DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2017.11929563

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)        ISSN: 0899-8280


  8 in total

1.  Types of unintended consequences related to computerized provider order entry.

Authors:  Emily M Campbell; Dean F Sittig; Joan S Ash; Kenneth P Guappone; Richard H Dykstra
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2006-06-23       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  IOM report: the future of emergency care in the United States health system.

Authors: 
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.451

3.  Unexpected increased mortality after implementation of a commercially sold computerized physician order entry system.

Authors:  Yong Y Han; Joseph A Carcillo; Shekhar T Venkataraman; Robert S B Clark; R Scott Watson; Trung C Nguyen; Hülya Bayir; Richard A Orr
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Implementing electronic health records in the emergency department.

Authors:  Daniel A Handel; Jeffrey L Hackman
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2008-09-14       Impact factor: 1.484

Review 5.  Overcrowding in the nation's emergency departments: complex causes and disturbing effects.

Authors:  R W Derlet; J R Richards
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.721

6.  National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 1997 emergency department summary.

Authors:  P Nourjah
Journal:  Adv Data       Date:  1999-05-06

7.  Transient and sustained changes in operational performance, patient evaluation, and medication administration during electronic health record implementation in the emergency department.

Authors:  Michael J Ward; Craig M Froehle; Kimberly W Hart; Sean P Collins; Christopher J Lindsell
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 5.721

Review 8.  Costs and benefits of health information technology.

Authors:  Paul G Shekelle; Sally C Morton; Emmett B Keeler
Journal:  Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep)       Date:  2006-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.